Performance metric alerting: a new design approach for complex alerting problems

Alerting systems and related decision-making automation are widely used to enhance the safety and capability of controlled processes across many applications. Traditional alerting systems use physical metrics such as temperature, distance between vehicles, or time-to-impact as bases for making alerting decisions. Threshold values on these metrics are typically derived using an iterative process to ensure the achievement of desired performance goals, defined by higher-level metrics such as false alarm, safety, or success probabilities. We generalize this problem and develop two state spaces: one representing physical metrics and one representing performance metrics. A traditional alerting system operates completely within the physical space, using decision thresholds that have been developed off-line during the design process by examining how the physical threshold translates across to the performance state space. The physical metrics thus act as an indirect means to control the performance of the system. We propose an alternate approach that enables the system to operate online in the performance space. Alerting decisions are based directly on the computed values of metrics such as false alarm probability rather than on surrogate physical metrics. These two design approaches are then contrasted in case studies of recently-developed alerting systems.

[1]  R. L. Ford,et al.  The Protected Volume of Airspace Generated by an Airborne Collision Avoidance System , 1986 .

[2]  P. Cashion,et al.  A study of commercial flight crew self-separation , 1997, 16th DASC. AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Reflections to the Future. Proceedings.

[3]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[4]  C. Wickens Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[5]  W. E. Kelly Conflict detection and alerting for separation assurance systems , 1999, Gateway to the New Millennium. 18th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH37033).

[6]  Soumya Jana,et al.  SIGNAL DETECTION AND ESTIMATION , 2002 .

[7]  R. L. Ford,et al.  The Conflict Resolution Process for TCAS II and Some Simulation Results , 1987, Journal of Navigation.

[8]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  Prototype Conflict Alerting System for Free Flight , 1997 .

[9]  John Lygeros,et al.  A probabilistic approach to aircraft conflict detection , 2000, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[10]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  Psychology and human performance. , 1959 .

[11]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  Prototype Conflict Alerting Logic for Free Flight , 1997 .

[12]  Mike Jackson,et al.  GASPER/AILS: an integrated DGPS/ADS-B airborne alerting system for closely spaced parallel approaches , 2000, IEEE 2000. Position Location and Navigation Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37062).

[13]  Andrew D. Zeitlin,et al.  Safety Study of TCAS II for Logic Version 6.04 , 1992 .

[14]  K. S. Lindsay,et al.  Assessment of field trials, algorithmic performance, and benefits of the User Request Evaluation Tool (URET) conflict probe , 1997, 16th DASC. AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Reflections to the Future. Proceedings.

[15]  N. A. Spencer,et al.  Development and operation of the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[16]  Lee C. Yang,et al.  USING INTENT INFORMATION IN PROBABILISTIC CONFLICT ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[17]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  Evaluation of Collision Avoidance Maneuvers for Parallel Approach , 1999 .

[18]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  Aircraft conflict analysis and real-time conflict probing using probabilistic trajectory modeling , 2000 .

[19]  James K. Kuchar Methodology for Alerting-System Performance Evaluation , 1996 .

[20]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods , 2000, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[21]  B J Chludzinski LINCOLN LABORATORY EVALUATION OF TCAS II LOGIC VERSION 7 APPENDICES.. , 1997 .

[22]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[23]  H. Erzberger,et al.  Design of a conflict detection algorithm for the Center/TRACON automation system , 1997, 16th DASC. AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Reflections to the Future. Proceedings.

[24]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  Generalized Philosophy of Alerting with Applications for Parallel Approach Collision Prevention , 2001 .

[25]  J. Swets,et al.  A decision-making theory of visual detection. , 1954, Psychological review.