Multidetector-CT Evaluation of Bone Substitutes Remodeling after Revision Hip Surgery

We evaluated remodeling of grafted bone substitutes after revision hip arthroplasty using serial examinations of multidetector-row computed tomography imaging. Ten patients (12 hips) had cementless revision surgery with grafting of beta-tricalcium phosphate granules and pastelike calcium phosphate cement in bone defects around the femoral component. At 3 weeks and 1 year postoperatively, the patients were evaluated using multidetector-row computed tomography imaging with a metal artifact minimizing protocol. New bone formation and changes in volume of beta-tricalcium phosphate and calcium phosphate cement were measured. At 1 year postoperatively, beta-tricalcium phosphate had decreased more than calcium phosphate cement. The residual volumes of calcium phosphate cement and beta-tricalcium phosphate were 78% (range, 37%-96%) and 30% (range, 10%-62%) of the initial grafted volume, respectively. The volume of the new bone that formed after absorption of beta- tricalcium phosphate was 34% (range, 11%-76%) of the initial beta-tricalcium phosphate volume. Use of cement in prior operations was an unfavorable factor in graft remodeling after revision surgery. Multidetector-row computed tomography is a promising tool for evaluating bone stock restoration of patients and influential factors of bone remodeling, and for clarifying remodeling patterns of various bone substitutes.Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  E. Morscher,et al.  Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis , 1997, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[2]  L. Dorr,et al.  Assessment of bone graft substitutes in autopsy implant retrievals of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  J. Lieberman,et al.  Bone graft for revision hip arthroplasty: biology and future applications. , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  R. Barrack,et al.  Osteoinductive agents in reconstructive hip surgery: a look forward. , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  E. Schwarz,et al.  Use of volumetric computerized tomography as a primary outcome measure to evaluate drug efficacy in the prevention of peri‐prosthetic osteolysis: A 1‐year clinical pilot of etanercept vs. placebo , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  Angelo Carbone,et al.  Measurement of Bone Defects Adjacent to Acetabular Components of Hip Replacement , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  S David Stulberg,et al.  Use of Helical Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Acetabular Osteolysis After Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  C. Finkemeier,et al.  Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Thomas W Bauer,et al.  Bioactive materials in orthopaedic surgery: overview and regulatory considerations. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  S. T. Yoon,et al.  Osteoinductive Molecules in Orthopaedics: Basic Science and Preclinical Studies , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  H. Hatano,et al.  Histological examination of beta-tricalcium phosphate graft in human femur. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  H. Hatano,et al.  Histological examination of β-tricalcium phosphate graft in human femur† , 2002 .

[13]  P. Böhm,et al.  Femoral Revision with the Wagner SL Revision Stem: Evaluation of One Hundred and Twenty-nine Revisions Followed for a Mean of 4.8 Years , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  R. Ganz,et al.  Femoral revision using the Wagner stem: results at 2–9 years , 2001, International Orthopaedics.

[15]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Cemented first-time revisions of the femoral component: prospective 7 to 13 years' follow-up using second-generation and third-generation technique. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  B. Atilla,et al.  Scintigraphic evaluation of impaction grafting for total hip arthroplasty revision , 2000, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[17]  K. Rąpała,et al.  An unusual case of early pancreas graft loss. , 1999 .

[18]  M. Piert,et al.  Allogenic bone graft viability after hip revision arthroplasty assessed by dynamic [18F]fluoride ion positron emission tomography , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  K. Rąpała,et al.  The application of allogenic bone grafts for replantation of a hip prosthesis; an attempt at radiological evaluation of graft rebuilding. , 1999, Annals of transplantation.

[20]  J. K. Smith,et al.  Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. , 1998, Radiology.

[21]  H. Kurita,et al.  In vivo study of a calcium phosphate cement consisting of alpha-tricalcium phosphate/dicalcium phosphate dibasic/tetracalcium phosphate monoxide. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[22]  J O Hollinger,et al.  Role of bone substitutes. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  V. Goldberg,et al.  Factors Affecting Bone Graft Incorporation , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  C. Engh,et al.  Structural bulk allografts in acetabular reconstruction. Analysis of two grafts retrieved at post-mortem. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  C. Engh,et al.  Morselized allograft in acetabular reconstruction. A postmortem retrieval analysis. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  P. Greis,et al.  A long-term study on defect filling and bone ingrowth using a canine fiber metal total hip model. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  W. Paprosky Femoral defect classification ; Clinical application , 1990 .

[28]  R. E. Sherman,et al.  Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Thermally induced bone necrosis in rabbits: relation to implant failure in humans. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  K. Lynch,et al.  Tissue response to implants of calcium phosphate ceramic in the rabbit spine. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  D. S. Metsger,et al.  Tricalcium phosphate ceramic--a resorbable bone implant: review and current status. , 1982, Journal of the American Dental Association.