Wilmington Robotic Exoskeleton: A Novel Device to Maintain Arm Improvement in Muscular Disease

Background Upper-extremity movement is limited in individuals with muscular weakness. This paper describes a novel, articulated upper-extremity orthosis, the Wilmington Robotic Exoskeleton (WREX), which helps people overcome this movement deficit. Methods This prospective, case-controlled study involved an ambulatory patient with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita and 2 nonambulatory patients with spinal muscular atrophy type II. The WREX uses elastic bands to negate the effects of gravity; it allows a person with neuromuscular weakness to move their arm in 3 dimensions. The WREX can be fixed on a brace for ambulatory patients and on the wheelchair for nonambulatory patients. Assessment was performed through motion analysis (with and without the WREX), clinical examination, and qualitative questionnaire. Results Motion analysis showed a marked improvement in upper-extremity function with the WREX. The questionnaire illustrated enhanced functionality with the WREX including self-feeding, fine motor control, and use of a television remote control. Enhanced functionality resulted in improved quality of life by increasing participation in school, raising self-esteem, and increasing social interaction. Two unexpected outcomes were increased security with trunk inclination and amelioration of the effects of contractures. Conclusions The WREX provided an increase in functionality and improved the quality of life of the patients. The device has become an integral part of the lives of the 3 patients. Level of Evidence Level III in Therapeutic Studies-Investigating the Results of Treatment.

[1]  M. James,et al.  Posterior elbow capsulotomy with triceps lengthening for treatment of elbow extension contracture in children with arthrogryposis. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  R. Seliktar,et al.  Design and Testing of a Functional Arm Orthosis in Patients With Neuromuscular Diseases , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Michael Alexander,et al.  Passive exoskeletons for assisting limb movement. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  M. Bell,et al.  Transfer of pectoralis major in arthrogryposis to restore elbow flexion: deteriorating results in the long term. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  C. Goldfarb,et al.  The Steindler flexorplasty for the arthrogrypotic elbow. , 2004, The Journal of hand surgery.

[6]  L. Döderlein,et al.  Principles of treatment of the upper extremity in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita type I. , 1997, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[7]  L. Hakamies‐Blomqvist,et al.  Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: perinatal and electromyographic findings, disability, and psychosocial outcome. , 1997, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[8]  P. Williams Management of upper limb problems in arthrogryposis. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  P. Stern,et al.  Modular adjustment mechanism for the balanced forearm orthosis. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  C. Long,et al.  The balanced forearm orthosis in muscular dystrophy. , 1965, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.