Modern Manufacturing Paradigms - A Comparison

Companies aim to increase their prof- its by continuously striving to offer their customers what they want, when they want and where they want it. This makes it imperative for them to pro- vide customized products at mass production prices while reducing the design-to-market times and lead times. There are many techniques available in the research literature today that purport to help com- panies achieve these often-times contradicting and complex goals. Some of these techniques like lean principles have gained widespread popularity partly fueled by the success story of companies that pio- neered them, Toyota for one. However, others like mass customization and agile manufacturing have not yet taken off as well as they should have been. The reasons for this laggard response might be partly due to the lack of understanding of the underlying funda- mentals and partly due to the inability to keep up pro- lific rate at which newer concepts are being brought to fruition. This work aims to compare these techniques and provide practitioners with an understanding of these techniques thus enabling them to select one or a combination of many of these approaches best suited to their needs.

[1]  Yasuhiro Monden,et al.  Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-In-Time , 1993 .

[2]  Yahaya Yusuf,et al.  A comparative study of lean and agile manufacturing with a related survey of current practices in the UK , 2002 .

[3]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .

[4]  T. Shallice What ghost in the machine? , 1992, Nature.

[5]  S. Kotha Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition , 1992 .

[6]  Hung-Da Wan,et al.  Reconfiguration of manufacturing systems considering leanness and agility , 2004 .

[7]  Oscar Castillo,et al.  Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2007, IMECS 2007, March 21-23, 2007, Hong Kong, China , 2007, IMECS.

[8]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[9]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[10]  Arun N. Nambiar Mass Customization: Where do we go from here? , 2009 .

[11]  Anju Vyas Print , 2003 .

[12]  D. Murphey,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2006 .

[13]  Edward D. Arnheiter,et al.  The integration of lean management and Six Sigma , 2005 .

[14]  Duc Truong Pham,et al.  Fighting fit factories: making industry lean, agile and sustainable , 2005 .

[15]  Rachna Shah,et al.  In pursuit of implementation patterns: the context of Lean and Six Sigma , 2008 .

[16]  Soo Wook Kim,et al.  Disentangling leanness and agility: An empirical investigation , 2006 .

[17]  H. Katayama,et al.  Agility, adaptability and leanness: A comparison of concepts and a study of practice , 1999 .

[18]  Danny Berry,et al.  Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain , 1999 .

[19]  新郷 重夫,et al.  A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint , 1989 .

[20]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[21]  J Prince,et al.  Combining lean and agile characteristics: Creation of virtual groups by enhanced production flow analysis , 2003 .

[22]  C. Hart Future perfect. , 1998, Nursing times.

[23]  Rajan Suri,et al.  Quick Response Manufacturing , 1998 .

[24]  Arun N. Nambiar Agile manufacturing: A taxonomic framework for research , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering.