The effects of levels of elaboration on learners’ strategic processing of text

In the current work, we examined learners’ comprehension when engaged with elaborative processing strategies. In Experiment 1, we randomly assigned students to one of five elaborative processing conditions and addressed differences in learners’ lower- and higher-order learning outcomes and ability to employ elaborative strategies. Findings indicated no significant differences among conditions on learning outcomes. However, learners better able to employ elaborative processing strategies performed better on outcome measures. Experiment 2 extended this research and addressed whether there would be differences across elaborative processing conditions in learners’ comprehension at delayed testing. We also examined the role of motivation in performance and strategy use. Findings indicated no differences on the outcome measures at delayed testing; however, there were significant differences in learners’ performance on an integration outcome at immediate testing. In addition, significant positive correlations were indicated for several outcome measures, strategy use and mastery orientation. Future research should further consider instructional scaffolds to promote learners’ strategic processing and critical individual difference variables as they effect elaborative processing.

[1]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  The effect of scaffolding students' context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE , 2000 .

[3]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Enhancing Adolescents' Recall of Factual Content: The Impact of Provided versus Self-Generated Elaborations. , 1994 .

[4]  J. Bransford,et al.  Constraints on effective elaboration: Effects of precision and subject generation , 1979 .

[5]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[6]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Use of elaborative interrogation to help students acquire information consistent with prior knowledge and information inconsistent with prior knowledge , 1994 .

[7]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Self-Regulation through Transactional Strategies Instruction , 2007 .

[8]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[9]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Elaborative-interrogation effects depend on the nature of the question. , 1991 .

[10]  Carole A. Ames,et al.  Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students' Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes , 1988 .

[11]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  The benefits of embedded question adjuncts for low and high structure builders. , 2007 .

[12]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[13]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Mechanisms that facilitate the effectiveness of elaboration strategies. , 1997 .

[14]  Kenneth A. Kiewra,et al.  Effects of Repetition on Recall and Note-Taking: Strategies for Learning from Lectures. , 1991 .

[15]  Richard Remedios,et al.  Do undergraduates' motives for studying change as they progress through their degrees? , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[16]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Elaborative Interrogation Facilitates Acquisition of Confusing Facts. , 1988 .

[17]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Elaborative-interrogation and prior-knowledge effects on learning of facts , 1992 .

[18]  Eric Anthony Day,et al.  Construct- and criterion-related validity of four commonly used goal orientation instruments. , 2003 .

[19]  Vera Woloshyn,et al.  Using elaborative interrogation to facilitate acquisition of factual information in cooperative learning settings: One good strategy deserves another , 1994 .

[20]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Interactions Among Elaborative Interrogation, Knowledge, and Interest in the Process of Constructing Knowledge From Text , 2004 .

[21]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Information comparisons in example-based hypermedia environments: supporting learners with processing prompts and an interactive comparison tool , 2008 .

[23]  T. Willoughby,et al.  Evaluating the quality and impact of mediators for learning when using associative memory strategies , 1994 .

[24]  Vera Woloshyn,et al.  Helping students acquire belief-inconsistent and belief-consistent science facts: Comparisons between individual and dyad study using elaborative interrogatin, self-selected study and repetitious-reading , 1995 .

[25]  E. Wood,et al.  Isolating variables that impact on or detract from the effectiveness of elaboration strategies. , 1994 .

[26]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[27]  Rayne A. Sperling,et al.  Facilitating Learning From Technology-Enhanced Text: Effects of Prompted Elaborative Interrogation , 2006 .

[28]  Hamilton.  Effects of Three Types of Elaboration on Learning Concepts from Text , 1997, Contemporary educational psychology.

[29]  T. Willoughby,et al.  When can a lack of structure facilitate strategic processing of information? , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[30]  Peggy Noel Van Meter,et al.  Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text , 2006 .

[31]  E. Salas,et al.  The science of training: a decade of progress. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Development of achievement motivation. , 2007 .

[33]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  1. Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension , 2002 .

[34]  Timothy L. Seifert,et al.  Enhancing memory for main ideas using elaborative interrogation , 1994 .

[35]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Generation and precision of elaboration: Effects on intentional and incidental learning. , 1987 .

[36]  J. Bransford,et al.  Elaboration and knowledge acquisition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Thérèse Bouffard,et al.  The impact of goal orientation on self‐regulation and performance among college students , 1995 .

[38]  Carole A. Ames.  Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[39]  Richard J. Hamilton.  Material appropriate processing and elaboration: The impact of balanced and complementary types of processing on learning concepts from text. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[40]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[41]  Eileen Wood,et al.  ELABORATIVE INTERROGATION EXAMINED AT ENCODING AND RETRIEVAL , 1994 .

[42]  Hiller A. Spires,et al.  Prior knowledge activation: Inducing engagement with informational texts. , 1998 .

[43]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  The Development of Ability Conceptions , 2002 .

[44]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Elaborative Interrogation Facilitates Adult Learning of Factual Paragraphs , 1990 .

[45]  Sonya Symons,et al.  Elaborative interrogation and children's learning of unfamiliar facts , 1993 .

[46]  A. Elliot,et al.  A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  M. Wittrock.  Generative Teaching of Comprehension , 1991, The Elementary School Journal.

[48]  Rayne A. Sperling,et al.  A comparison of the effects of students’ expository text comprehension strategies , 2010 .

[49]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[50]  Eileen Wood,et al.  The Effect of Prior Knowledge on an Immediate and Delayed Associative Learning Task Following Elaborative Interrogation , 1993 .

[51]  Rayne A. Sperling,et al.  Elaborative Questions in Web-Based Text Materials , 2004 .

[52]  M. Wittrock.  Generative Processes of Comprehension , 1989 .

[53]  G. Hatano,et al.  Contribution of content knowledge and learning ability to the learning of facts. , 1991 .

[54]  T. Willoughby,et al.  Evaluating the Efficacy of Elaborative Strategies for Remembering Expository Text , 1999 .

[55]  Timothy L. Seifert,et al.  Effects of elaborative interrogation with prose passages. , 1993 .

[56]  Sonya Symons,et al.  Elaborative Interrogation Effects for Children with Learning Disabilities: Isolated Facts versus Connected Prose☆ , 1996 .

[57]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[58]  A. Graesser,et al.  Improving Comprehension Through Discourse Processing , 2002 .

[59]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[60]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Elaborative interrogation effects on children's learning of factual content. , 1990 .

[61]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Elaborative Strategy Instruction Relative to Spontaneous Strategy Use in High Achievers , 1993 .

[62]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Enhancing learning through strategy instruction and group interaction: is active generation of elaborations critical? , 2000 .

[63]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain , 2006 .

[64]  Daniel H. Robinson,et al.  Graphic organizers as aids to text learning , 1997 .

[65]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Computational Efficiency through Visual Argument: Do Graphic Organizers Communicate Relations in Text Too Effectively?. , 1994 .

[66]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Differences in approaches to learning: An overview. , 1982 .

[67]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The effects of self‐explaining when learning with text or diagrams , 2003 .

[68]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The impact of text coherence on learning by self-explanation , 2007 .

[69]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Learning With Analogy and Elaborative Interrogation , 1996 .

[70]  Richard J. Hamilton,et al.  The Effects of Learner-Generated Elaborations on Concept Learning from Prose , 1989 .

[71]  M. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .

[72]  D. Jonassen.  Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model , 1994 .

[73]  D. McNamara,et al.  The Importance of Teaching Reading Strategies , 2009 .

[74]  Lisa A. Porter,et al.  Use of Elaboration Strategies by Students in Grades Two, Four, and Six , 1999, The Elementary School Journal.