Evidence that structural rearrangements and/or flexibility during TCR binding can contribute to T cell activation.

While in many cases the half-life of T cell receptor (TCR) binding to a particular ligand is a good predictor of activation potential, numerous exceptions suggest that other physical parameter(s) must also play a role. Accordingly, we analyzed the thermodynamics of TCR binding to a series of peptide-MHC ligands, three of which are more stimulatory than their stability of binding would predict. Strikingly, we find that during TCR binding these outliers show anomalously large changes in heat capacity, an indicator of conformational change or flexibility in a binding interaction. By combining the values for heat capacity (DeltaCp) and the half-life of TCR binding (t(1/2)), we find that we can accurately predict the degree of T cell stimulation. Structural analysis shows significant changes in the central TCR contact residue of the peptide-MHC, indicating that structural rearrangements within the TCR-peptide-MHC interface can contribute to T cell activation.

[1]  Raimund J. Ober,et al.  Kinetics and thermodynamics of T cell receptor– autoantigen interactions in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Robyn L. Stanfield,et al.  An αβ T Cell Receptor Structure at 2.5 Å and Its Orientation in the TCR-MHC Complex , 1996, Science.

[3]  R A Houghten,et al.  Immunogenicity. I. Use of peptide libraries to identify epitopes that activate clonotypic CD4+ T cells and induce T cell responses to native peptide ligands. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[4]  D. Fremont,et al.  Structural Basis of Cytochrome c Presentation by IEk , 2002, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[5]  D E Koshland,et al.  A piston model for transmembrane signaling of the aspartate receptor. , 1999, Science.

[6]  Martin Wiedmann,et al.  The Organizing Principle in the Formation of the T Cell Receptor-CD3 Complex , 2002, Cell.

[7]  Ursula Esser,et al.  Mapping T-cell receptor–peptide contacts by variant peptide immunization of single-chain transgenics , 1992, Nature.

[8]  E. Palmer,et al.  The T-cell receptor signalosome: a dynamic structure with expanding complexity. , 2002, Current opinion in immunology.

[9]  C. Janeway,et al.  Ligands for the T-cell receptor: hard times for avidity models. , 1995, Immunology today.

[10]  Bernard Malissen,et al.  A T cell receptor CDR3beta loop undergoes conformational changes of unprecedented magnitude upon binding to a peptide/MHC class I complex. , 2002, Immunity.

[11]  I. Wilson,et al.  Antibody-antigen interactions , 1993 .

[12]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Dynamics of cell surface molecules during T cell recognition. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[13]  David M Kranz,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the contribution of TCR/pepMHC affinity and CD8 to T cell activation. , 2003, Immunity.

[14]  D. Aivazian,et al.  Phosphorylation of T cell receptor ζ is regulated by a lipid dependent folding transition , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[15]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[16]  K. P. Murphy,et al.  Thermodynamics of structural stability and cooperative folding behavior in proteins. , 1992, Advances in protein chemistry.

[17]  S. Smith‐Gill,et al.  X-ray snapshots of the maturation of an antibody response to a protein antigen , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[18]  Simon J Davis,et al.  Molecular interactions mediating T cell antigen recognition. , 2003, Annual review of immunology.

[19]  M. Davis,et al.  Kinetics of T-cell receptor binding to peptide/I-Ek complexes: correlation of the dissociation rate with T-cell responsiveness. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  R L Stanfield,et al.  Antibody-antigen interactions: new structures and new conformational changes. , 1994, Current opinion in structural biology.

[21]  K. Garcia,et al.  A functional hot spot for antigen recognition in a superagonist TCR/MHC complex. , 2000, Immunity.

[22]  K. P. Murphy,et al.  Predicting binding energetics from structure: Looking beyond ΔG° , 1999 .

[23]  A. Fersht,et al.  Experimental assignment of the structure of the transition state for the association of barnase and barstar. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  L R Pease,et al.  Structural basis of plasticity in T cell receptor recognition of a self peptide-MHC antigen. , 1998, Science.

[25]  P. Anton van der Merwe,et al.  CDR3 loop flexibility contributes to the degeneracy of TCR recognition , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[26]  G. Gao,et al.  Killer Cell Immunoglobulin Receptors and T Cell Receptors Bind Peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I with Distinct Thermodynamic and Kinetic Properties* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  R. Poljak,et al.  The basics of binding: mechanisms of antigen recognition and mimicry by antibodies. , 1993, Current opinion in immunology.

[28]  Z Reich,et al.  Ligand recognition by alpha beta T cell receptors. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[29]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Two-step binding mechanism for T-cell receptor recognition of peptide–MHC , 2002, Nature.

[30]  K. P. Murphy,et al.  Structural energetics of peptide recognition: Angiotensin II/antibody binding , 1993, Proteins.

[31]  B K Jakobsen,et al.  TCR binding to peptide-MHC stabilizes a flexible recognition interface. , 1999, Immunity.

[32]  D. F. Waugh,et al.  Protein-protein interactions. , 1954, Advances in protein chemistry.

[33]  K. P. Murphy,et al.  Van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpies from isothermal titration calorimetry: are there significant discrepancies? , 2001, Biochemistry.

[34]  J. Whisstock,et al.  A Structural Basis for the Selection of Dominant αβ T Cell Receptors in Antiviral Immunity , 2003 .

[35]  R. S. Spolar,et al.  Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA. , 1994, Science.

[36]  B M Baker,et al.  Four A6-TCR/peptide/HLA-A2 structures that generate very different T cell signals are nearly identical. , 1999, Immunity.

[37]  Jan Engberg,et al.  Visualization of Myelin Basic Protein (Mbp) T Cell Epitopes in Multiple Sclerosis Lesions Using a Monoclonal Antibody Specific for the Human Histocompatibility Leukocyte Antigen (Hla)-Dr2–Mbp 85–99 Complex , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[38]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[39]  David I Stuart,et al.  A structural basis for immunodominant human T cell receptor recognition , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[40]  R. Germain,et al.  The dynamics of T cell receptor signaling: complex orchestration and the key roles of tempo and cooperation. , 1999, Annual review of immunology.

[41]  Z Reich,et al.  Thermodynamics of T cell receptor binding to peptide-MHC: evidence for a general mechanism of molecular scanning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  D. Kranz,et al.  Cd8− T Cell Transfectants That Express a High Affinity T Cell Receptor Exhibit Enhanced Peptide-Dependent Activation , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[43]  E. Palmer,et al.  A motif within the T cell receptor alpha chain constant region connecting peptide domain controls antigen responsiveness. , 1996, Immunity.

[44]  W A Hendrickson,et al.  Energetics of the HIV gp120-CD4 binding reaction. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Balbino Alarcón,et al.  Recruitment of Nck by CD3ϵ Reveals a Ligand-Induced Conformational Change Essential for T Cell Receptor Signaling and Synapse Formation , 2002, Cell.

[46]  W. Stites,et al.  Protein−Protein Interactions: Interface Structure, Binding Thermodynamics, and Mutational Analysis , 1997 .

[47]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Antigen/MHC-specific T cells are preferentially exported from the thymus in the presence of their MHC ligand , 1989, Cell.

[48]  M. Davis,et al.  A kinetic basis for T cell receptor repertoire selection during an immune response. , 1999, Immunity.

[49]  P. Privalov,et al.  The energetics of HMG box interactions with DNA: thermodynamics of the DNA binding of the HMG box from mouse sox-5. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  E. Reinherz,et al.  Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer , 2001, Cell.

[51]  L. Pease,et al.  Degenerate recognition of alloantigenic peptides on a positive-selecting class I molecule. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[52]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  [20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[53]  Ian A Wilson,et al.  The specificity of TCR/pMHC interaction. , 2002, Current opinion in immunology.

[54]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[55]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[56]  P. Allen,et al.  Structural basis for T cell recognition of altered peptide ligands: a single T cell receptor can productively recognize a large continuum of related ligands , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[57]  David I. Stuart,et al.  The Human Low Affinity Fcγ Receptors IIa, IIb, and III Bind IgG with Fast Kinetics and Distinct Thermodynamic Properties* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[58]  P. Privalov,et al.  Energetics of the specific binding interaction of the first three zinc fingers of the transcription factor TFIIIA with its cognate DNA sequence , 2000, Proteins.

[59]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Distinct molecular mechanisms account for the specificity of two different T-cell receptors. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[60]  P. Anton van der Merwe,et al.  The TCR Triggering Puzzle , 2001 .

[61]  M. Brenowitz,et al.  Thermodynamic and kinetic characterization of the binding of the TATA binding protein to the adenovirus E4 promoter. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[62]  Mark M Davis,et al.  A New Trigger for T Cells , 2002, Cell.

[63]  R C Stevens,et al.  Structural insights into the evolution of an antibody combining site. , 1997, Science.

[64]  Gerhard Wagner,et al.  Structure, specificity and CDR mobility of a class II restricted single-chain T-cell receptor , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[65]  M. Davis,et al.  Use of global amino acid replacements to define the requirements for MHC binding and T cell recognition of moth cytochrome c (93-103). , 1994, Journal of immunology.