Linear Models for Visual Data Mining in Medical Images

Modern non-invasive imaging modalities such as Computer-Aided Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging brought a new perspective to anatomic characterization, as they allowed detailed observation of in vivo structures. The amount of provided data became, however, progressively overwhelming. Data may be useless if we are not able to extract relevant information from them and to discard undesirable artifacts and redundancy. Ultimately, we aim to discover new knowledge from collected data, and to be able to statistically represent this knowledge in the form of prior distributions that may be used to validate new hypotheses, in addition to clinical and demographic information. In this chapter we propose an analysis of available methods for data mining in very high-dimensional sets of data obtained from medical imaging modalities. When applied to imaging studies, data reduction methods may be able to minimize data redundancy and reveal subtle or hidden patterns. Our analysis is concentrated on linear transformation models based on unsupervised learning that explores the relationships among morphologic variables, in order to find clusters with strong correlation. This clustering can potentially identify regions that have anatomic significance and thus lend insight to knowledge discovery and hypothesis testing. We illustrate this chapter with successful case studies related to the segmentation of neuroanatomic structures and the characterization of pathologies.

[1]  J. Gee,et al.  What's in a name: voxel-based morphometric analyses of MRI and naming difficulty in Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal degeneration. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  E. Cabanis,et al.  Minimal Surface A Useful Paradigm to Describe the Deeper Part of the Corpus Callosum? , 1997, Brain Research Bulletin.

[3]  James C. Gee,et al.  Design of a Statistical Model of Brain Shape , 1997, IPMI.

[4]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[5]  D. Lawley VI.—The Estimation of Factor Loadings by the Method of Maximum Likelihood , 1940 .

[6]  K. Jöreskog Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1967 .

[7]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Segmentation and interpretation of MR brain images. An improved active shape model , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  J. Tukey,et al.  Multiple-Factor Analysis , 1947 .

[10]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  A Unifying Review of Linear Gaussian Models , 1999, Neural Computation.

[11]  James C. Gee,et al.  Atlas warping for brain morphometry , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[12]  A. Toga,et al.  Cortical variability and asymmetry in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  H. Harman Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[14]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Factor analysis by generalized least squares , 1972 .

[15]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  An active contour model for mapping the cortex , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[16]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  NEW METHODS IN MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FACTOR ANALYSIS , 1967 .

[17]  V. Denenberg,et al.  A factor analysis of the human's corpus callosum , 1991, Brain Research.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[19]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images , 1994, Image Vis. Comput..

[20]  R. D'Agostino Small Sample Probability Points for the D Test of Normality , 1972 .

[21]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Multiresolution elastic matching , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[22]  C. Spearman General intelligence Objectively Determined and Measured , 1904 .

[23]  James C. Gee,et al.  On matching brain volumes , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[24]  Ching-Chuong Lin,et al.  A simple test for normality against asymmetric alternatives , 1980 .

[25]  Tony J. Simon,et al.  Visuospatial and Numerical Cognitive Deficits in Children with Chromosome 22Q11.2 Deletion Syndrome , 2005, Cortex.

[26]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Characterization of Neuropathological Shape Deformations , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[27]  H. Hotelling The relations of the newer multivariate statistical methods to factor analysis. , 1957 .

[28]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[29]  G. H. Thomson,et al.  Hotelling's method modified to give Spearman's g. , 1934 .

[30]  S. F. Witelson Hand and sex differences in the isthmus and genu of the human corpus callosum. A postmortem morphological study. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Applied Factor Analysis in the Natural Sciences. , 1997 .

[32]  James C. Gee,et al.  Corpus callosum morphology and ventricular size in chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome , 2007, Brain Research.

[33]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Modal Matching for Correspondence and Recognition , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..