Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business

Information systems research on implementation success has always posited the importance of organizational context factors. This implies that previous results, obtained almost exclusively from studies of large organizations, cannot necessarily be generalized to small organizations. This article presents an empirical investigation designed to study the relationship between organizational characteristics and the success of MIS in the context of small business. Several hypotheses were tested using data collected from 464 small manufacturing firms in the province of Quebec. The results show that several organizational computer-usage characteristics are significantly associated to MIS success. It was also found that most of these characteristics are related to the length of a firm's EDP experience.

[1]  P. Ein-Dor,et al.  Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems , 1978 .

[2]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The use of an interactive information storage and retrieval system in medical research , 1978, CACM.

[3]  William H. DeLone Firm Size and the Characteristics of Computer Use , 1981, MIS Q..

[4]  Alexander M. Maish A User's Behavior Toward His MIS , 1979, MIS Q..

[5]  Steven K. Paulson,et al.  Small Business and the Theory of Small Bureaucracies , 1979 .

[6]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .

[7]  John A. Welsh,et al.  A Small Business is not a Little Big Business Harvard Business Review, Vol. 59, No. 4, July/August, 1981, pp.18 (9 pages , 1982 .

[8]  R. F. Powers,et al.  MisProject Management: Myths, Opinions, and Reality , 1973 .

[9]  R. Nolan,et al.  Managing the Four Stages of EDP Growth , 1974 .

[10]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement , 1974 .

[11]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .

[12]  Scott Hamilton,et al.  Evaluating Information Systems Effectiveness - Part II: Comparing Evaluator Viewpoints , 1981, MIS Q..

[13]  Jr. Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Performance and the Use of an Information System , 1975 .

[14]  N. Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  Information Systems in Small Business: Are They Used in Managerial Decisions? , 1982 .

[15]  James A. Senn,et al.  Research in Management Information Systems: The Minnesota Experiments , 1977 .

[16]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical Evidence , 1982, MIS Q..

[17]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[18]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[19]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  A descriptive model of information systems in the context of the organization , 1973, DATB.

[20]  Robert E. Stauffer,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF SMALL BUREAUCRACIES , 1966 .

[21]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Analysis, Design, and Implementation of Information Systems , 1983 .

[22]  James F. Courtney,et al.  A Field Study of Organizational Factors Influencing DSS Success , 1985, MIS Q..

[23]  Thomas W. Harrell,et al.  THE PERSONALITY OF HIGH EARNING MBA'S IN BIG BUSINESS1 , 1969 .

[24]  C. Schewe The Management Information System User: An Exploratory Behavioral Analysis , 1976 .