Head angle and elevation in classroom environments: implications for amplification.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine children's head orientation relative to the arrival angle of competing signals and the sound source of interest in actual school settings. These data were gathered to provide information relative to the potential for directional benefit. METHOD Forty children, 4-17 years of age, with and without hearing loss, completed the study. Deviation in head angle and elevation relative to the direction of sound sources of interest were measured in 40 school environments. Measurements were made on the basis of physical data and videotapes from 3 cameras placed within each classroom. RESULTS The results revealed similarly accurate head orientation across children with and without hearing loss when focusing on the 33% proportion of time in which children were most accurate. Orientation accuracy was not affected by age. The data also revealed that children with hearing loss were significantly more likely to orient toward brief utterances made by secondary talkers than were children with normal hearing. CONCLUSIONS These data are consistent with the hypothesized association between hearing loss and increased visual monitoring. In addition, these results suggest that age does not limit the potential for signal-to-noise improvements from directivity-based interventions in noisy environments.

[1]  M. Wertheimer Psychomotor Coordination of Auditory and Visual Space at Birth , 1961, Science.

[2]  G. Turkewitz,et al.  Responsiveness to simple and complex auditory stimuli in the human newborn. , 1972, Developmental psychobiology.

[3]  T W Tillman,et al.  Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  J Field,et al.  Newborn infants orient to sounds. , 1979, Child development.

[5]  J. Broerse,et al.  Auditory-visual integration in neonates: a signal detection analysis. , 1980, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  R K Clifton,et al.  Newborns' orientation toward sound: possible implications for cortical development. , 1981, Child development.

[7]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[8]  Daniel H. Ashmead,et al.  Precision of Auditory Localization in Human Infants. , 1987 .

[9]  B. Morrongiello,et al.  Infants' localization of sounds in the horizontal plane: effects of auditory and visual cues. , 1986, Child development.

[10]  R K Clifton,et al.  The development of a human auditory localization response: a U-shaped function. , 1989, Canadian journal of psychology.

[11]  B. Morrongiello,et al.  Infants' localization of sounds within hemifields: estimates of minimum audible angle. , 1990, Child development.

[12]  D. Ashmead,et al.  Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural time differences in human infants. , 1991, Child development.

[13]  J. Madell FM systems as primary amplification for children with profound hearing loss. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[14]  Infants' perception of low pitch. , 1992 .

[15]  C. Crandell Speech Recognition in Noise by Children with Minimal Degrees of Sensorineural Hearing loss , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Fred H. Bess,et al.  Amplification for children with auditory deficits , 1996 .

[17]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Audition and visual attention: the developmental trajectory in deaf and hearing populations. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[18]  J S Gravel,et al.  Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[20]  T Ricketts,et al.  The Impact of Head Angle on Monaural and Binaural Performance with Directional and Omnidirectional Hearing Aids , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[21]  T Ricketts,et al.  Directivity Quantification in Hearing Aids: Fitting and Measurement Effects , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[22]  T Ricketts,et al.  Impact of Noise Source Configuration on Directional Hearing Aid Benefit and Performance , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[23]  Paula P. Henry,et al.  Impact of Compression and Hearing Aid Style on Directional Hearing Aid Benefit and Performance , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[24]  Todd A. Ricketts,et al.  The effects of changes in head angle on auditory and visual input for omnidirectional and directional microphone hearing aids. , 2003, American journal of audiology.

[25]  Paula P. Henry,et al.  Full Time Directional versus User Selectable Microphone Modes in Hearing Aids , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[26]  Todd A Ricketts,et al.  Distance and Reverberation Effects on Directional Benefit , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[27]  The effects of changes in head angle on auditory and visual input for omnidirectional and directional microphone hearing aids. , 2003, American journal of audiology.

[28]  Mary T Cord,et al.  Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[29]  M Samantha Lewis,et al.  Speech perception in noise: directional microphones versus frequency modulation (FM) systems. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[30]  R. Bentler Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[31]  Todd A Ricketts,et al.  Application of Frequency Importance Functions to Directivity for Prediction of Benefit in Uniform Fields , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[32]  P. Maruff,et al.  The Development of Sustained Attention in Children: The Effect of Age and Task Load , 2006, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[33]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Speech Understanding in Background Noise with the Two-Microphone Adaptive Beamformer BEAM™ in the Nucleus Freedom™ Cochlear Implant System , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[34]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Directional benefit in simulated classroom environments. , 2007, American journal of audiology.