Modeling Acquiescence in Measurement Models for Two Balanced Sets of Items

This article concerns a number of conditions that must be met before reaching a conclusion about the existence of the agreement component of a response style called acquiescence. The focus is on the specification of a common style factor behind at least 2 independent theoretical concepts, each measured by a balanced set of items. The proposed approach is explored with a random subsample (N = 986) from a large-scale survey, and subsequently confirmed in another subsample (N = 992) from the same population (Flanders) and in a random sample (N = 1,055) from a different population (Wallonia). The strong relation in both populations of the latent style factor with a variable "sum of agreements" supports the idea that it is possible to control for acquiescence in structural equations.

[1]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  New developments in LISREL: analysis of ordinal variables using polychoric correlations and weighted least squares , 1990 .

[2]  The Impact of Agreement Bias on the Ranking of Questionnaire Response , 1987 .

[3]  J. Ray.  Acquiescence and Problems with Forced-Choice Scales , 1990 .

[4]  D. Katz,et al.  American Statistical Association , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Questions and answers in attitude surveys , 1982 .

[6]  H W Marsh,et al.  Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  P. Bentler.  Semantic Space is (Approximately) Bipolar , 1969 .

[8]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Personality attributes associated with extreme response style. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  P M Bentler,et al.  Identification of content and style: a two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Lee J. Cronbach,et al.  Studies of acquiescence as a factor in the true-false test. , 1942 .

[11]  J. Billiet.  Church involvement, individualism, and ethnic prejudice among Flemish Roman Catholics: New evidence of a moderating effect , 1995 .

[12]  L. G. Rorer,et al.  THE GREAT RESPONSE-STYLE MYTH. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[14]  D. Paulhus.  Measurement and control of response bias. , 1991 .

[15]  D. Jackson,et al.  Content and style in personality assessment. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Catherine E. Ross,et al.  Eliminating defense and agreement bias from measures of the sense of control : A 2×2 index , 1991 .

[17]  G. Moran,et al.  Double agreement as a function of item ambiguity and susceptibility to demand implications of the psychological situation. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  L. Cronbach.  Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design , 1950 .

[19]  Willem E. Saris,et al.  The Detection and Correction of Specification Errors in Structural Equation Models , 1987 .

[20]  Jack Block,et al.  The challenge of response sets , 1965 .

[21]  J. Ray.  Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. , 1983 .

[22]  Henk A. L. Kiers,et al.  Why Factor Analysis Often is the Incorrect Model for Analyzing Bipolar Concepts, and What Model to Use Instead , 1994 .

[23]  Dorothy Watson,et al.  Correcting for Acquiescent Response Bias in the Absence of a Balanced Scale , 1992 .

[24]  John J. Ray.  Reinventing the wheel: Winkler, Kanouse, and Ware on acquiescent response set , 1984 .

[25]  Paul E. Spector.  Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction , 1992 .

[26]  J. Ray.  A further comment on the Winkler, Kanouse, and Ware method of controlling for acquiescent response bias , 1984 .

[27]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  EDUCATION MODERATES SOME RESPONSE EFFECTS IN ATTITUDE MEASUREMENT , 1996 .

[28]  J. D. Martin.  Acquiescence—Measurement and Theory* , 1964 .

[29]  J. S. Long,et al.  Tests for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[30]  M. Mcclendon,et al.  Acquiescence and Recency Response-Order Effects in Interview Surveys , 1991 .

[31]  J. Ray.  Is the acquiescent response style problem not so mythical after all? Some results from a successful balanced F scale. , 1979, Journal of personality assessment.

[32]  J. Krosnick.  Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .

[33]  G. Vaughan,et al.  Using Balanced Scales to Control Acquiescence , 1970 .