What Does the Transactions Publish? What do Transactions' Readers Want to Read?

Research Problem: Investigate the match between content published by the Transactions and content sought by its readers. Research Questions: What content does the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication publish? How does that compare to the content published by other journals in the field? And what content do readers of the Transactions want to read? Literature Review: Researchers in most fields occasionally analyze the entire body of literature within a discipline to assess the current state of the literature, identify leading works, assess the state of the literature, provide a basis for changing the direction of a journal, and assess alignment among parts of the literature. Methodology: To identify what journals published, researchers used the STC Body of Knowledge schema and a list of categories of research methods that classify all peer-reviewed articles published between January 2006 and December 2010 in the Transactions, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Technical Communication, and Technical Communication Quarterly. To identify reader preferences of the Transactions, researchers surveyed members of the IEEE Professional Communication Society about their preferences for content and types of research. Results and Discussion: In terms of the topics covered, the three most widely covered topics in the Transactions were: (1) Deliverables, (2) Information Design and Development, and (3) Academic Programs. Readers prefer (1) About Technical and Professional Communication, (2) Information Design and Development, and (3) Research Theory, and Practice. The three least-covered topics were (1) Business Knowledge, (2) About Technical Communication, and (3) Technical Communication Standards. Of least interest to participants were: (1) Deliverables, (2) Quality Assurance, (3) Management, and (4) Technical Communication Standards. The Transactions primarily publishes experiments, surveys, and tutorials while readers prefer case studies, literature reviews, and tutorials.

[1]  James D. Klein ETR&D-development: An analysis of content and survey of future direction , 1997 .

[2]  Gerald J. Alred,et al.  Essential Works on Technical Communication , 2003 .

[3]  Liz V. Johnsen,et al.  Empirical Research on Performance Improvement. , 2008 .

[4]  Davida Charney Empiricism Is not a Four-Letter Word. , 1996 .

[5]  Rebekka Andersen,et al.  The Rhetoric of Enterprise Content Management (ECM): Confronting the Assumptions Driving ECM Adoption and Transforming Technical Communication , 2007 .

[6]  C. Brammer,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication: Looking to the Past to Discover the Present , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[7]  D. Charney From Logocentrism to Ethocentrism: Historicizing Critiques of Writing Research , 1998 .

[8]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[9]  Carolyn D. Rude,et al.  Mapping the Research Questions in Technical Communication , 2009 .

[10]  Diana L. Deadrick,et al.  An examination of the research–practice gap in HR: Comparing topics of interest to HR academics and HR professionals , 2007 .

[11]  Sudhir Gupta A Farewell , 2010, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[12]  Sean L. Humpherys,et al.  A Scientometric Study of the Perceived Quality of Business and Technical Communication Journals , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[13]  Anne-Marie Croteau,et al.  Employee Reactions to Paper and Electronic Surveys: An Experimental Comparison , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[14]  Kim Sydow Campbell Dank Je, Domo Arigato, and Thanks , 2007 .

[15]  James Hartley Never mind the impact factor: colleagues know better! , 2010, Learn. Publ..

[16]  William Hart-Davidson Content Management: Beyond Single-Sourcing , 2009 .

[17]  R. Torraco Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples , 2005 .

[18]  Ryan K. Boettger,et al.  Quantitative Content Analysis: Its Use in Technical Communication , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[19]  James D. Klein Empirical Research on Performance Improvement. , 2008 .

[20]  Reflections on Technical Communication Quarterly, 1991-2003: The Manuscript Review Process , 2004 .