Local enrichment of NURBS patches using a non-intrusive coupling strategy: Geometric details, local refinement, inclusion, fracture

In this work, we apply a non-intrusive global/local coupling strategy for the modelling of local phenomena in a NURBS patch. The idea is to consider the NURBS patch to be enriched as the global model. This results in a simple, flexible strategy: first, the global NURBS patch remains unchanged, which completely eliminates the need for costly re-parametrization procedures (even if the local domain is expected to evolve); then, easy merging of a linear NURBS code with any other existing robust codes suitable for the modelling of complex local behaviour is possible. The price to pay is the number of iterations of the non-intrusive solver but we show that this can be strongly reduced by means of acceleration techniques. The main development for NURBS is to be able to handle non-conforming geometries. Only slight changes in the implementation process, including the setting up of suitable quadrature rules for the evaluation of the interface reaction forces, are made in response to this issue. A range of numerical examples in two-dimensional linear elasticity are given to demonstrate the performance of the proposed methodology and its significant potential to treat any case of local enrichment in a NURBS patch simply.

[1]  Alain Combescure,et al.  An isogeometric locking‐free NURBS‐based solid‐shell element for geometrically nonlinear analysis , 2015 .

[2]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Efficient and accurate numerical quadrature for immersed boundary methods , 2015, Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences.

[3]  O. Allix,et al.  Non-intrusive and exact global/local techniques for structural problems with local plasticity , 2009 .

[4]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  The weak substitution method – an application of the mortar method for patch coupling in NURBS‐based isogeometric analysis , 2015 .

[5]  E. Rank Adaptive remeshing and h-p domain decomposition , 1992 .

[6]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[7]  David J. Benson,et al.  On the numerical integration of trimmed isogeometric elements , 2015 .

[8]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  n-Widths, sup–infs, and optimality ratios for the k-version of the isogeometric finite element method , 2009 .

[9]  John D. Whitcomb,et al.  Iterative Global/Local Finite Element Analysis , 1990 .

[10]  Martin H. Sadd,et al.  Elasticity: Theory, Applications, and Numerics , 2004 .

[11]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing , 1999 .

[12]  G. Farin Curves and Surfaces for Cagd: A Practical Guide , 2001 .

[13]  Tom Lyche,et al.  Polynomial splines over locally refined box-partitions , 2013, Comput. Aided Geom. Des..

[14]  O. Allix,et al.  Nonintrusive coupling of 3 D and 2 D laminated composite models based on finite element 3 D recovery , 2017 .

[15]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Hybrid analytical and extended finite element method (HAX‐FEM): A new enrichment procedure for cracked solids , 2010 .

[16]  E. Rank,et al.  A zooming-technique using a hierarchical hp-version of the finite element method , 1993 .

[17]  J. L. Steger,et al.  A chimera grid scheme , 2011 .

[18]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA , 2009 .

[19]  Tom Lyche,et al.  Discrete B-splines and subdivision techniques in computer-aided geometric design and computer graphics , 1980 .

[20]  Les A. Piegl,et al.  The NURBS Book , 1995, Monographs in Visual Communication.

[21]  Martin Ruess,et al.  Nitsche’s method for a coupling of isogeometric thin shells and blended shell structures , 2015 .

[22]  Anthony Gravouil,et al.  Isogeometric local h-refinement strategy based on multigrids , 2015 .

[23]  John A. Evans,et al.  Isogeometric analysis using T-splines , 2010 .

[24]  Manfred Bischoff,et al.  Numerical efficiency, locking and unlocking of NURBS finite elements , 2010 .

[25]  Peter Betsch,et al.  Isogeometric analysis and domain decomposition methods , 2012 .

[26]  T. Hughes,et al.  Local refinement of analysis-suitable T-splines , 2012 .

[27]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Applying the hp–d version of the FEM to locally enhance dimensionally reduced models , 2007 .

[28]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis of Structural Vibrations , 2006 .

[29]  B. Simeon,et al.  A hierarchical approach to adaptive local refinement in isogeometric analysis , 2011 .

[30]  Olivier Allix,et al.  Nonintrusive coupling of 3D and 2D laminated composite models based on finite element 3D recovery , 2014, 1501.01933.

[31]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Studies of Refinement and Continuity in Isogeometric Structural Analysis (Preprint) , 2007 .

[32]  C. Duarte,et al.  Analysis and applications of a generalized finite element method with global-local enrichment functions , 2008 .

[33]  Dominik Schillinger,et al.  The Finite Cell Method: A Review in the Context of Higher-Order Structural Analysis of CAD and Image-Based Geometric Models , 2015 .

[34]  Y. Bazilevs,et al.  Weakly enforced essential boundary conditions for NURBS‐embedded and trimmed NURBS geometries on the basis of the finite cell method , 2013 .

[35]  Y. Bazilevs,et al.  Small and large deformation analysis with the p- and B-spline versions of the Finite Cell Method , 2012 .

[36]  A. Huerta,et al.  NURBS-Enhanced Finite Element Method (NEFEM) , 2011 .

[37]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Weak coupling for isogeometric analysis of non-matching and trimmed multi-patch geometries , 2014 .

[38]  Mathilde Chevreuil,et al.  A multiscale method with patch for the solution of stochastic partial differential equations with localized uncertainties , 2013 .

[39]  Anthony Gravouil Marie-Christine Local/global non-intrusive crack propagation simulation , 2013 .

[40]  D. F. Rogers,et al.  An Introduction to NURBS: With Historical Perspective , 2011 .

[41]  Gerald Farin,et al.  Curves and surfaces for cagd , 1992 .

[42]  Olivier Pironneau,et al.  Numerical zoom for multiscale problems with an application to nuclear waste disposal , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[43]  Roland Glowinski,et al.  Finite element approximation of multi-scale elliptic problems using patches of elements , 2005, Numerische Mathematik.

[44]  R. Taylor The Finite Element Method, the Basis , 2000 .

[45]  John A. Evans,et al.  An Isogeometric design-through-analysis methodology based on adaptive hierarchical refinement of NURBS, immersed boundary methods, and T-spline CAD surfaces , 2012 .

[46]  Vinh Phu Nguyen,et al.  Nitsche’s method for two and three dimensional NURBS patch coupling , 2013, 1308.0802.

[47]  Mickaël Duval,et al.  Non-intrusive Coupling: Recent Advances and Scalable Nonlinear Domain Decomposition , 2016 .

[48]  Pierre Kerfriden,et al.  Nitsche's method method for mixed dimensional analysis: conforming and non-conforming continuum-beam and continuum-plate coupling , 2013, 1308.2910.

[49]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Isogeometric collocation: Cost comparison with Galerkin methods and extension to adaptive hierarchical NURBS discretizations , 2013 .

[50]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  A Nitsche‐type formulation and comparison of the most common domain decomposition methods in isogeometric analysis , 2014 .