Controlled randomised crossover trial of the effects of physiotherapy on mobility in chronic multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVES To determine whether physiotherapy can improve mobility in chronic multiple sclerosis and whether there is a difference between treatment at home and as a hospital outpatient? METHODS A randomised controlled crossover trial was undertaken in patients with chronic multiple sclerosis who had difficulty walking and were referred from neurology clinics: allocation was to one of six permutations of three 8 week treatment periods separated by 8 week intervals: treatments consisted of physiotherapy at home, as an outpatient, or “no therapy”. The main outcome measures were based on independent assessments at home and included mobility related disability (primary outcome: the Rivermead mobility index), gait impairments, arm function, mood, and subjective patient and carer ratings. Therapy was assessed by recording delivery, achievement of set targets, patient and carer preference, and cost. RESULTS On the Rivermead mobility index (scale 0–15) (primary outcome) there was a highly significant (p<0.001) treatment effect of 1.4–1.5 units favouring hospital or home based therapy over no therapy: this was supported by other measures of mobility, gait, balance, and the assessor's global “mobility change” score: there was no major difference between home and hospital. Carers preferred home treatment but neither they nor patients discerned greater benefit there. Estimated costs of home physiotherapy were £25/session and those at hospital were £18 (including £7 patient travel costs). CONCLUSION A course of physiotherapy is associated with improved mobility, subjective wellbeing, and improved mood in chronic multiple sclerosis compared with no treatment but benefit may only last a few weeks: there is little to choose between home and hospital based therapy but the first is more costly, mainly due to skilled staff travelling time.

[1]  D. Wade,et al.  The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. , 1991, International disability studies.

[2]  P. Halligan,et al.  A comparison of two physiotherapy treatment approaches to improve walking in multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled study , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[3]  F. Nouri,et al.  An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients , 1987 .

[4]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Clinical Gait Assessment in the Neurologically Impaired , 1984 .

[5]  A J Thompson,et al.  The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[6]  Rw Bohannon,et al.  Correlation of lower limb strengths and other variables with standing performance in stroke patients , 1989 .

[7]  R. Katzman.,et al.  Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. , 1983, The American journal of psychiatry.

[8]  R. Swingler,et al.  The morbidity of multiple sclerosis. , 1992, The Quarterly journal of medicine.

[9]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Rivermead Mobility Index: a brief review of research to date , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[11]  J. Petajan,et al.  Impact of aerobic training on fitness and quality of life in multiple sclerosis , 1996, Annals of neurology.

[12]  L. Desouza,et al.  Physical rehabilitation has a positive effect on disability in multiple sclerosis patients. , 2000, Neurology.

[13]  L Mendozzi,et al.  Physical rehabilitation has a positive effect on disability in multiple sclerosis patients , 1999, Neurology.

[14]  B Gerdle,et al.  Endurance training in patients with multiple sclerosis: five case studies. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[15]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. , 1988, International disability studies.

[16]  D. Goodkin,et al.  Upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: improving assessment sensitivity with box-and-block and nine-hole peg tests. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  G. Huston The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. , 1987, The Journal of rheumatology.

[18]  B. Bobath,et al.  Book Review: ‘Proceedings’ Put Emphasis on Treatment of Children: Abnormal Motor Behaviour: Abnormal Postural Reflex Activity Caused by Brain Lesions , 1972 .

[19]  M. Walker,et al.  Practical guidelines for independent assessment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation , 1997, Clinical rehabilitation.

[20]  R G Newcombe,et al.  Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[22]  D. Wade,et al.  Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. , 1985, International rehabilitation medicine.

[23]  M. B. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of treatment protocols on minimal to moderate spasticity in multiple sclerosis. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.