Face recognition in young children : When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts

Do young children recognize faces differently than older children and adults? Previous research (Carey & Diamond, 1977) has suggested that, before the age of 8, children recognize a face by its individual features; after the age of 8, they switch to a whole-face (holistic) recognition strategy. The part-whole paradigm provides a suitable test for the encoding switch hypothesis. In this paradigm, memory for a face part is probed when the part is presented in isolation and in the whole face. The difference in performance between the two test conditions serves as an index of holistic processing. Results from such studies reveal that even 6-year-olds remember parts from upright faces better when tested in the whole-face context than in isolation. When faces are inverted, the holistic processes of young children and older children are disrupted. These results indicate that counter to the encoding switch hypothesis, children recognize faces holistically by 6 years of age.

[1]  M J Farah,et al.  Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: Testing a theory of face perception , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[3]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[4]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[6]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[7]  R. Flin,et al.  Development of face recognition: an encoding switch? , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[8]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[9]  H. Ellis The development of face processing skills. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  M. Baenninger The development of face recognition: featural or configurational processing? , 1994, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[12]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition , 1993 .

[13]  S. Carey,et al.  Development of face recognition: A maturational component? , 1980 .

[14]  I. Sigel,et al.  Concept overdiscrimination in children. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[16]  P. Green Biology and Cognitive Development: the Case of Face Recognition, Mark H. Johnson, John Morton. Blackwell, Oxford (1991), x, +180. Price £35.00 hardback, £10.95 paperback , 1992 .

[17]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.