Back to basics: a componential analysis of the original cognitive interview mnemonics with three age groups

A large body of research now exists which demonstrates that the cognitive interview (CI) increases the reporting of correct recall from various population groups. It is now necessary to determine from both a theoretical and an applied perspective which of the CI techniques, or combination of techniques are largely responsible for this CI superiority effect. The two aims of this study were (1) to examine the relative effectiveness of each of the four original CI mnemonics and (2) to assess their efficacy as a function of age. A total of 125 participants; 34 first-year undergraduate students, 44 children aged 8–9 years and 47 children aged 5–6 years viewed a video-recording of an accident. Forty-eight hours later each participant was individually interviewed and randomly assigned to one of six instruction groups; (1) context reinstatement, (2) change perspective, (3) change order, (4) report everything, (5) report everything + context reinstatement combination (RE + CR), or (6) a control instruction to ‘try again’. Each of the individual CI mnemonics were found to be of equal benefit and to occasion no more recall than the ‘try again’ control. However, the RE + CR combination resulted in significantly more correct recall compared to the individual mnemonics. There was no effect of age group on the efficacy of the various instructions

[1]  R. E. Geiselman,et al.  Effects of cognitive interviewing and practice on children's recall performance. , 1992 .

[2]  M. Lamb,et al.  Investigative Interviews of Children: A Guide for Helping Professionals , 1998 .

[3]  B. Clifford,et al.  A Field evaluation of training in three methods of witness/victim investigative interviewing , 1996 .

[4]  G. Gudjonsson,et al.  The relationship between confabulation and intellectual ability, memory, interrogative suggestibility and acquiescence , 1995 .

[5]  J. Boon,et al.  Changing perspectives in cognitive interviewing , 1994 .

[6]  R. Bull,et al.  Isolating the effects of the Cognitive Interview techniques , 1997 .

[7]  Ray Bull,et al.  Towards understanding the effects of interviewer training in evaluating the cognitive interview , 1994 .

[8]  Ronald P. Fisher,et al.  Enhancement of Eyewitness Memory with the Cognitive Interview , 1986 .

[9]  J. Dennett,et al.  The cognitive interview technique: Reviving the issues , 1993 .

[10]  M. Pipe,et al.  Returning to the scene: reminders and context reinstatement enhance children's recall. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[11]  Child witness statement quality , 1995 .

[12]  R. Bull,et al.  The cognitive interview and child witnesses. , 1993 .

[13]  R. Milne,et al.  The cognitive interview: A survey of its forensic effectiveness , 1999 .

[14]  R. Fisher,et al.  Facilitating children's eyewitness recall with the revised cognitive interview. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Ray Bull,et al.  Investigative Interviewing: Psychology and Practice , 1999 .

[16]  P. Dietze,et al.  Mental reinstatement of context: a technique for interviewing child witnesses , 1993 .

[17]  R. Bull,et al.  The cognitive interview: Its origins, empirical support, evaluation and practical implications , 1991 .

[18]  R. Bull,et al.  Interviewer behaviour in investigative interviews , 1997 .

[19]  R. Bull,et al.  The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis , 1999 .

[20]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .