Sensitivity and accuracy of high-throughput metabarcoding methods for early detection of invasive fish species

High-throughput DNA metabarcoding has gained recognition as a potentially powerful tool for biomonitoring, including early detection of aquatic invasive species (AIS). DNA based techniques are advancing, but our understanding of the limits to detection for metabarcoding complex samples is inadequate. For detecting AIS at an early stage of invasion when the species is rare, accuracy at low detection limits is key. To evaluate the utility of metabarcoding in future fish community monitoring programs, we conducted several experiments to determine the sensitivity and accuracy of routine metabarcoding methods. Experimental mixes used larval fish tissue from multiple “common” species spiked with varying proportions of tissue from an additional “rare” species. Pyrosequencing of genetic marker, COI (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) and subsequent sequence data analysis provided experimental evidence of low-level detection of the target “rare” species at biomass percentages as low as 0.02% of total sample biomass. Limits to detection varied interspecifically and were susceptible to amplification bias. Moreover, results showed some data processing methods can skew sequence-based biodiversity measurements from corresponding relative biomass abundances and increase false absences. We suggest caution in interpreting presence/absence and relative abundance in larval fish assemblages until metabarcoding methods are optimized for accuracy and precision.

[1]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring , 2012 .

[2]  N. Mandrak,et al.  Identifying Canadian Freshwater Fishes through DNA Barcodes , 2008, PloS one.

[3]  William D. Taylor,et al.  The nearshore phosphorus shunt: a consequence of ecosystem engineering by dreissenids in the Laurentian Great Lakes , 2004 .

[4]  P. Hulme Beyond control : wider implications for the management of biological invasions , 2006 .

[5]  Rob DeSalle,et al.  Obtaining, Storing and Archiving Specimens and Tissue Samples for Use in Molecular Studies , 2002 .

[6]  H. Ko,et al.  Evaluating the Accuracy of Morphological Identification of Larval Fishes by Applying DNA Barcoding , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  P. Miller,et al.  Evaluating Ethanol-based Sample Preservation to Facilitate Use of DNA Barcoding in Routine Freshwater Biomonitoring Programs Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Eric D. Stein,et al.  Is DNA Barcoding Actually Cheaper and Faster than Traditional Morphological Methods: Results from a Survey of Freshwater Bioassessment Efforts in the United States? , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[10]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. , 1994, Molecular marine biology and biotechnology.

[11]  X. Pochon,et al.  Evaluating Detection Limits of Next-Generation Sequencing for the Surveillance and Monitoring of International Marine Pests , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Aibin Zhan,et al.  High sensitivity of 454 pyrosequencing for detection of rare species in aquatic communities , 2013 .

[13]  P. Hebert,et al.  Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes , 2004, PLoS biology.

[14]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Influence of Artifact Removal on Rare Species Recovery in Natural Complex Communities Using High-Throughput Sequencing , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Simultaneous assessment of the macrobiome and microbiome in a bulk sample of tropical arthropods through DNA metasystematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  B. May,et al.  Ecological and Genetic Effects of Salmonid Introductions in North America , 1991 .

[17]  N. Auer Identification of larval fishes of the Great Lakes basin with emphasis on the Lake Michigan drainage , 1982 .

[18]  L. Rudstam,et al.  Alteration of Ecosystem Function by Zebra Mussels in Oneida Lake: Impacts on Submerged Macrophytes , 2006, Ecosystems.

[19]  L. Crowder Alewife, rainbow smelt and native fishes in Lake Michigan: competition or predation? , 1980, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[20]  P. Hebert,et al.  Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  R. Ward,et al.  DNA barcoding Australia's fish species , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  D. Baird,et al.  Environmental Barcoding: A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach for Biomonitoring Applications Using River Benthos , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  John A Darling,et al.  From molecules to management: adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments. , 2011, Environmental research.

[24]  G. Inglis,et al.  Sensitivity and cost considerations for the detection and eradication of marine pests in ports. , 2005, Marine pollution bulletin.

[25]  Martin F. Polz,et al.  Bias in Template-to-Product Ratios in Multitemplate PCR , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[26]  M. Boileau The Expansion of White Perch, Morone Americana, In the Lower Great Lakes , 1985 .

[27]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States , 2005 .

[28]  J. W. Pendleton,et al.  Surveys of Gene Families Using Polymerase Chain Reaction: PCR Selection and PCR Drift , 1994 .

[29]  Guidelines for collecting and maintaining archives for genetic monitoring , 2012, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[30]  David L. Wheeler,et al.  GenBank , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  C. W. West,et al.  Effort and potential efficiencies for aquatic non-native species early detection , 2011 .

[32]  Z. Nagy A hands-on overview of tissue preservation methods for molecular genetic analyses , 2010, Organisms Diversity & Evolution.

[33]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Performance comparison of genetic markers for high‐throughput sequencing‐based biodiversity assessment in complex communities , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[34]  G. Saunders Routine DNA barcoding of Canadian Gracilariales (Rhodophyta) reveals the invasive species Gracilaria vermiculophylla in British Columbia , 2009, Molecular ecology resources.

[35]  M. Fukui,et al.  Optimization of Annealing Temperature To Reduce Bias Caused by a Primer Mismatch in Multitemplate PCR , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[36]  C. P. Schneider,et al.  Predation by sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) on lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in southern Lake Ontario, 1982-1992 , 1996 .

[37]  Sabrina J. Lovell,et al.  The Economic Impacts of Aquatic Invasive Species: A Review of the Literature , 2006, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[38]  C. W. West,et al.  Exploiting habitat and gear patterns for efficient detection of rare and non-native benthos and fish in Great Lakes coastal ecosystems. , 2009 .

[39]  William A. Walters,et al.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[40]  Gretchen J. A. Hansen,et al.  A Pound of Prevention, Plus a Pound of Cure: Early Detection and Eradication of Invasive Species in the Laurentian Great Lakes , 2010 .

[41]  J. R. King,et al.  Recommendations on the use of alcohols for preservation of ant specimens (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) , 2004, Insectes Sociaux.

[42]  J. Stribling,et al.  Data quality, performance, and uncertainty in taxonomic identification for biological assessments , 2008, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[43]  S. Ratnasingham,et al.  BOLD : The Barcode of Life Data System (www.barcodinglife.org) , 2007 .

[44]  Edward L. Mills,et al.  Exotic Species and the Integrity of the Great Lakes. , 1994 .

[45]  Peter Haase,et al.  First audit of macroinvertebrate samples from an EU Water Framework Directive monitoring program: human error greatly lowers precision of assessment results , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[46]  I. Spies,et al.  Early larvae of Zesticelus profundorum (family Cottidae) identified using DNA barcoding , 2011, Ichthyological Research.

[47]  Stanford H. Smith Species Interactions of the Alewife in the Great Lakes , 1970 .

[48]  Yiyuan Li,et al.  Quantification of mesocosm fish and amphibian species diversity via environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[49]  I. Spies,et al.  DNA-based identification of Alaska skates (Amblyraja, Bathyraja and Raja: Rajidae) using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (coI) variation , 2006 .

[50]  D. Janzen,et al.  Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Potential Abiotic and Biotic Impacts of Zebra Mussels on the Inland Waters of North America , 1996 .

[52]  Li Yang,et al.  Species identification through mitochondrial rRNA genetic analysis , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[53]  Natalia Ivanova,et al.  Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding , 2007 .