The Analgesia Nociception Index: a pilot study to evaluation of a new pain parameter during labor.

BACKGROUND Objective pain assessment that is not subject to influences from either cultural or comprehension issues is desirable. Analysis of heart rate variability has been proposed as a potential method. This pilot study aimed to assess the performance of the PhysioDoloris™ analgesia monitor which calculates an Analgesia Nociception Index derived from heart rate variability. It was compared with visual analogical pain scores. METHODS Forty-five parturients who requested epidural analgesia were recruited. Simultaneous couplets of pain scores and Analgesia Nociception Index values were recorded every 5 min regardless of the presence or absence of uterine contractions. The relationship between indices was characterized, and a cut-off value of Analgesia Nociception Index corresponding to a visual analogical score >30 (range 0-100) was used to determine the positive and negative predictive value of the Analgesia Nociception Index. RESULTS There was a negative linear relationship between visual analogical pain scores and Analgesia Nociception Index values regardless of the presence of uterine contractions (regression coefficient ± SEM=-0.18 ± 0.032 for entire dataset). Uterine contraction significantly reduced the Analgesia Nociception Index (P<0.0001). Using a visual analogical pain score >30 to define a painful sensation, the lower 95% confidence limit for the Analgesia Nociception Index score was 49. CONCLUSION The Analgesia Nociception Index has an inverse linear relationship with visual analogical pain scores. Further studies are necessary to confirm the results of this pilot study and to look at the influence of epidural analgesia on the Analgesia Nociception Index.

[1]  K. H. Chan,et al.  The Effect of Heart Rate Variability on Request for Labor Epidural Analgesia , 2010 .

[2]  D. Lauderdale,et al.  Life-course predictors of ultrasonic heel measurement in a cross-sectional study of immigrant women from Southeast Asia. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  A. Dassonneville,et al.  PhysioDoloris: a monitoring device for Analgesia / Nociception balance evaluation using Heart Rate Variability analysis , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[4]  J. De Jonckheere,et al.  Validation of a graphic measurement of heart rate variability to assess analgesia/nociception balance during general anesthesia , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[6]  A. Weissman,et al.  The effects of meperidine and epidural analgesia in labor on maternal heart rate variability. , 2009, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1—correlation within subjects , 1995 .

[8]  R. Logier,et al.  From pain to stress evaluation using Heart Rate Variability analysis: Development of an evaluation platform , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[9]  Régis Logier,et al.  Heart rate variability during total intravenous anesthesia: Effects of nociception and analgesia , 2009, Autonomic Neuroscience.

[10]  H. V. van Geijn,et al.  Heart Rate Variability , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  M. Tournaire,et al.  Complementary and Alternative Approaches to Pain Relief During Labor , 2007, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[12]  T. Latson,et al.  Effects of surgical stimulation on autonomic reflex function: assessment by changes in heart rate variability. , 1993, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  G. Plourde,et al.  Autonomic Nervous System Response to Epidural Analgesia in Laboring Patients by Wavelet Transform of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Variability , 2004, Anesthesiology.

[14]  I Korhonen,et al.  Novel multiparameter approach for measurement of nociception at skin incision during general anaesthesia. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[15]  A. Dassonneville,et al.  An efficient algorithm for R-R intervals series filtering , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  A. Farcomeni,et al.  Multidimensional evaluation of pain during early and late labor: a comparison of nulliparous and multiparous women. , 2010, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[17]  S. Petersen-Felix,et al.  Heart rate variability does not discriminate between different levels of haemodynamic responsiveness during surgical anaesthesia. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[18]  G. Berntson,et al.  The cardiovascular startle response: anxiety and the benzodiazepine receptor complex. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Régis Logier,et al.  Pain / Analgesia evaluation using heart rate variability analysis , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  C. Kuo,et al.  The effect of heart rate variability on request for labour epidural analgesia , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[21]  D. Altman,et al.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2—correlation between subjects , 1995, BMJ.