Abstract Improving the lot of small-scale farmers in developing countries is receiving considerable attention from national and international agencies world wide. Approaches to research and development that have the small-scale farm in mind have been improved over the last decade, to the extent that it is now possible to review the major lessons for the advancement of methodologies in what is known as farming systems research and development (FSR&D). This paper describes FSR&D as a concept and a process, the presumptions underlying the FSR&D approach and a basis for seeing FSR&D as a form of technology with its own cultural attributes, i.e. values, beliefs, expectations and rules of behavior. Key areas are identified where FSR&D differs from more traditional research and development (R&D) work in agriculture. Then key points are explored where the inherent cultural attributes of FSR&D may be in conflict with the culture of the host country where an FSR&D team intends to operate. In conclusion, suggestions are made as to what a team might do to adjust FSR&D methodologies to be compatible with the host culture.
[1]
R. Bierstedt,et al.
The social order
,
1957
.
[2]
W. Whyte.
Social Inventions for Solving Human Problems
,
1982
.
[3]
W. Goodenough,et al.
Culture, language, and society
,
1981
.
[4]
W. Shaner.
Farming Systems Research And Development: Guidelines For Developing Countries
,
1982
.
[5]
G. Hofstede,et al.
Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values
,
1980
.
[6]
M. Harris,et al.
The Rise Of Anthropological Theory
,
1968
.
[7]
J. Useem,et al.
Men in the Middle of the Third Culture: The Roles of American and Non-Western People in Cross-Cultural Administration
,
1963
.
[8]
R. Brislin,et al.
Cross-cultural orientation programs
,
1976
.
[9]
H. Triandis.
Subjective Culture and Economic Development
,
1973
.
[10]
J. Finn.
Expectations and the Educational Environment1
,
1972
.
[11]
Theodore W. Schultz,et al.
Transforming Traditional Agriculture
,
1964
.