Computer-aided diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis with optical tomography, Part 2: image classification

Abstract. This is the second part of a two-part paper on the application of computer-aided diagnosis to diffuse optical tomography (DOT) for diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A comprehensive analysis of techniques for the classification of DOT images of proximal interphalangeal joints of subjects with and without RA is presented. A method for extracting heuristic features from DOT images was presented in Part 1. The ability of five classification algorithms to accurately label each DOT image as belonging to a subject with or without RA is analyzed here. The algorithms of interest are the k-nearest-neighbors, linear and quadratic discriminant analysis, self-organizing maps, and support vector machines (SVM). With a polynomial SVM classifier, we achieve 100.0% sensitivity and 97.8% specificity. Lower bounds for these results (at 95.0% confidence level) are 96.4% and 93.8%, respectively. Image features most predictive of RA are from the spatial variation of optical properties and the absolute range in feature values. The optimal classifiers are low-dimensional combinations (<7 features). These results underscore the high potential for DOT to become a clinically useful diagnostic tool and warrant larger prospective clinical trials to conclusively demonstrate the ultimate clinical utility of this approach.

[1]  A. Koch,et al.  Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis , 2010, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[2]  H. Sörensen,et al.  [Morphology and growth behavior of synovial cells in monolayer culture]. , 1991, Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie.

[3]  L Ryd,et al.  Proteoglycan fragments in joint fluid. Influence of arthrosis and inflammation. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  J Beuthan,et al.  [The development of a finger joint phantom for the optical simulation of early inflammatory rheumatic changes]. , 1997, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[5]  A. Silman,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative Aletaha, , 2010 .

[6]  Alexander D Klose,et al.  Computer-aided interpretation approach for optical tomographic images. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[7]  Theofanis Sapatinas,et al.  Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2005 .

[8]  Alexander D Klose,et al.  Multiparameter classifications of optical tomographic images. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[9]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[10]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) , 2006 .

[11]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice - evolution strategies, evolutionary programming, genetic algorithms , 1996 .

[12]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[13]  Hyun Keol Kim,et al.  Frequency-Domain Optical Tomographic Imaging of Arthritic Finger Joints , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  J. Beuthan,et al.  Computer-aided classification of rheumatoid arthritis in finger joints using frequency domain optical tomography , 2009, BiOS.

[15]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[16]  Hyun K Kim,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis with optical tomography, Part 1: feature extraction , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.