Vibroseis deconvolution: A comparison of pre and post correlation vibroseis deconvolution data in real noisy data

Abstract Vibroseis is a source used commonly for inland seismic exploration. This non-destructive source is often used in urban areas with strong environmental noise. The main goal of seismic data processing is to increase the signal/noise ratio where a determinant step is deconvolution. Vibroseis seismic data do not meet the basic minimum-phase assumption for the application of spiking and predictive deconvolution, therefore various techniques, such as phase shift, are applied to the data, to be able to successfully perform deconvolution of vibroseis data. This work analyzes the application of deconvolution techniques before and after cross-correlation on a real data set acquired for high resolution prospection of deep aquifers. In particular, we compare pre-correlation spiking and predictive deconvolution with Wiener filtering and with post-correlation time variant spectral whitening deconvolution. The main result is that at small offsets, post cross-correlation spectral whitening deconvolution and pre-correlation spiking deconvolution yield comparable results, while for large offsets the best result is obtained by applying a pre-cross-correlation predictive deconvolution.

[1]  R. Weber,et al.  COMMENTS ON “THE AMPLITUDE AND PHASE RESPONSE OF A SEISMIC VIBRATOR” BY W. E. LERWILL* , 1982 .

[2]  Umberta Tinivella,et al.  Characterization of the shallow aquifers by high‐resolution seismic data , 2008 .

[3]  Abd el-aziz Khairy Abd el-aal,et al.  Harmonic by harmonic removal technique for improving vibroseis data quality , 2011 .

[4]  William Carr Pritchett Acquiring Better Seismic Data , 1989 .

[5]  J. Sallas,et al.  Seismic vibrator control and the downgoing P-wave , 1984 .

[6]  E. A. Robinson,et al.  THE SPECTRAL FUNCTION OF A LAYERED SYSTEM AND THE DETERMINATION OF THE WAVEFORMS AT DEPTH , 1977 .

[7]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  LEAST‐SQUARES INVERSE FILTERING AND WAVELET DECONVOLUTION , 1977 .

[8]  G. Margrave,et al.  Examining the phase property of the nonstationary Vibroseis wavelet , 2004 .

[9]  Walter I. Futterman,et al.  Dispersive body waves , 1962 .

[10]  L. Lines,et al.  Vibroseis deconvolution: a comparison of cross‐correlation and frequency‐domain sweep deconvolution , 2001 .

[11]  David Walker Harmonic resonance structure and chaotic dynamics in the earth‐vibrator system1 , 1995 .

[12]  P. Hubral,et al.  Mixed-delay wavelet deconvolution of the point-source seismogram , 1991 .

[13]  W. E. Lerwill THE AMPLITUDE AND PHASE RESPONSE OF A SEISMIC VIBRATOR , 1981 .

[14]  Andrey V. Lebedev,et al.  Nonlinear distortion of signals radiated by vibroseis sources , 2004 .

[15]  U. Tinivella,et al.  3D seismic data for shallow aquifers characterisation , 2009 .

[16]  Walter Söllner,et al.  Elimination of Harmonic Distortion In Vibroseis Data , 1995 .

[17]  Milton J. Porsani,et al.  Mixed-phase deconvolution , 1998 .

[18]  Ken Larner,et al.  Predictive deconvolution and the zero‐phase source , 1984 .

[19]  A. Carlini,et al.  Seismic vibrator data processing for stratigraphic interpretation : a combined deterministic-statistical approach , 1991 .