Design and Development of Surgeon Augmented Endovascular Robotic System

Objective: Inadequate visual and force feedback while navigating surgical tools elevate the risk of endovascular procedures. It also poses occupational hazard due to repeated exposure to X-rays. A teleoperated robotic system that augments surgeon's actions is a solution. Method: We have designed and developed an endovascular robotic system that augments surgeon's actions using conventional surgical tools, as well as generates feedback in order to ensure safety during the procedure. The reaction force from vasculature is estimated from motor current that drives the surgical tool. Calibration required for force estimation is based on bilevel optimization. Input shaping is used in conjunction with a cascaded controller to avoid large responses due to faster inputs and to track tool position. The design, realization, and testing of our system are presented. Results : The responses of the system in comparison with the dynamics model is similar vis-à-vis the same input commands. Any error in the position tracking is reduced by the cascaded controller. Phase-portrait analysis of the system showed that the system is stable. The reaction force estimation is validated against load cell measurements. The safety mechanism in the events of excessive reaction forces while interacting with vasculature is demonstrated. Conclusion and Significance: Our system is a step toward intelligent robots that can assist surgeons during endovascular procedures by monitoring and alerting the surgeons regarding detrimental parameters. It arrests any unintended excursions of the surgical tools or surgeon's actions. This will also eliminate the need for surgeons to be in radiation environment.

[1]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[2]  Fumihito Arai,et al.  Micro force sensor for intravascular neurosurgery , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Donald L Miller Why use remote guidance to steer catheters and guide wires? , 2004, Radiology.

[4]  Mark Sadoski,et al.  Learning basic surgical skills with mental imagery: using the simulation centre in the mind , 2008, Medical education.

[5]  Hedyeh Rafii-Tari,et al.  Objective Assessment of Endovascular Navigation Skills with Force Sensing , 2017, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Single-chip velocity measurement system for incremental optical encoders , 1997, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[7]  Petter Karlsson Mälardalen Survey of Methods of Combining Velocity Profiles with Position control , 2009 .

[8]  William Singhose,et al.  Concurrent Design of Input Shaping and Proportional Plus Derivative Feedback Control , 2002 .

[9]  D. Dorion,et al.  Cognitive skills analysis, kinesiology, and mental imagery in the acquisition of surgical skills. , 2005, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[10]  N J W Cheshire,et al.  Robotically-steerable catheters and their role in the visceral aortic segment. , 2011, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  J. Dankelman,et al.  Haptics in minimally invasive surgery – a review , 2008, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[12]  J. Keith Nisbett,et al.  Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design , 1983 .

[13]  Paul T. Campbell,et al.  The impact of precise robotic lesion length measurement on stent length selection: ramifications for stent savings. , 2015, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[14]  J. W. Humberston Classical mechanics , 1980, Nature.

[15]  Maria Drangova,et al.  Design and Performance Evaluation of a Remote Catheter Navigation System , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Giora Weisz,et al.  Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach. , 2014, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[17]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  Practical Bilevel Optimization: Algorithms and Applications , 1998 .

[18]  Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli Endovascular interventions: A study of motor skills, design and fabrication of a system for endovascular telerobotic access (SETA) and a study on effect of haptics and robotic surgery on interventional procedures , 2009 .

[19]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  MRI-Compatible Fiber-Optic Force Sensors for Catheterization Procedures , 2010, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[20]  D Papadopoulou,et al.  Investigation of occupational radiation exposure during interventional cardiac catheterisations performed via radial artery. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[21]  Shuxiang Guo,et al.  Internet based remote control for a robotic catheter manipulating system , 2012, 2012 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering (CME).

[22]  Hugh Calkins,et al.  First experience with a novel robotic remote catheter system: Amigo™ mapping trial , 2013, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[23]  Ken Ikeuchi,et al.  Contact and friction between catheter and blood vessel , 2007 .

[24]  Qiang Gao,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of a novel robotic catheter system for vascular interventional surgery , 2015, Microsystem Technologies.

[25]  Hedyeh Rafii-Tari,et al.  A force feedback system for endovascular catheterisation , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[26]  Juan F Granada,et al.  Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  D. Jewitt,et al.  Manual of Otolaryngology , 1969 .

[28]  Takashi Komeda,et al.  Development of foolproof catheter guide system based on mechatronic design , 2013, Prod. Eng..

[29]  Jürgen Schröder,et al.  The mechanical properties of guidewires. Part I: Stiffness and torsional strength , 2007, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[30]  Mark Sadoski,et al.  Physicians' Reported Use of Mental Images and Language in Clinical Reasoning , 2004 .

[31]  S. Chitsaz,et al.  Robotically controlled ablation for atrial fibrillation: the first real-world experience in Africa with the Hansen robotic system , 2012, Cardiovascular journal of Africa.

[32]  Z. Hijazi,et al.  Comparison of costs of intracardiac echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography in monitoring percutaneous device closure of atrial septal defect in children and adults. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  P. Lanzer,et al.  Catheter-based cardiovascular interventions , 2013 .

[34]  David O. Martin,et al.  Remote magnetic navigation: human experience in pulmonary vein ablation. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  James J. Gallagher Endovascular skills: Guidewire and catheter skills for endovascular surgery , 2004 .

[36]  E Vaño,et al.  Occupational radiation doses in interventional cardiology: a 15-year follow-up. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[37]  Hongnian Yu,et al.  Operation and force analysis of the guide wire in a minimally invasive vascular interventional surgery robot system , 2015 .

[38]  Thenkurussi Kesavadas,et al.  Design and fabrication of a robotic mechanism for remote steering and positioning of interventional devices , 2010, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[39]  Liu Da,et al.  Overview of the vascular interventional robot , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[40]  N. Cheshire,et al.  Clinical applications of robotic technology in vascular and endovascular surgery. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.