Information dynamics and discourse in a distributed professional community

Professional associations could use virtual communities to reinvent their relationships with their members. One promising building block would be to revitalise special interest groups as loose knit Internet based communities. These would be what has been called "networks of practice" or "communities of interest". Although recognised phenomena, these terms are little more than labels, however. Far more has been written about the rich, close knit relations of communities of practice. This paper argues that as a model the community of practice concept is useful in defining dimensions by which such looser knit groups can be studied. To this end, community of practice theory is reviewed. The paper then presents a case study of an informal community among Web developers. It uses genre analysis to identify a dominant discourse which constitutes the list's local culture or repertoire. The genres in use are very efficient means of exchanging information, offering broad learning opportunities. They also construct a member identity. They exclude social and political issues, constructing "the problem" of the Web as technical. The "network" has a sense of community, yet it does not have the level of engagement of a community of practice because of the lack of task interdependence, the limits of the technology in use and the size of membership. This has some advantages such as giving it a longer life, requiring less commitment from members and coordinators and making it scale to numbers in a professional association. Professional associations could build up from such networks of practice, just as corporations have sought to cultivate spontaneous informal groups, to manage knowledge.

[1]  Pete Bradshaw,et al.  Online communities - vehicles for professional learning? , 2002 .

[2]  R. Drazin PROFESSIONALS AND INNOVATION: STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONAL VERSUS RADICAL-STRUCTURAL PERSPECTIVES* , 1990 .

[3]  Bettina J. Huber EXPERTS IN ORGANIZATIONS : THE POWER OF EXPERTISE , 1999 .

[4]  E. Schein Three Cultures of Management: The Key to Organizational Learning , 1996 .

[5]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Virtual community knowledge evolution , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Professional associations and the management of expertise , 1996 .

[7]  J. H. Erik Andriessen,et al.  Working with Groupware , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[8]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Silent Participants: Getting to Know Lurkers Better , 2003, From Usenet to CoWebs.

[10]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[11]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[12]  J. Liedtka Linking Competitive Advantage with Communities of Practice , 1999 .

[13]  S. Faraj,et al.  The Web of Knowledge: An Investigation of Knowledge Exchange in Networks of Practice , 2001 .

[14]  Stephen Gourlay Communities of practice : a new concept for the millenium, or the rediscovery of the wheel? , 1999 .

[15]  G. Ritzer,et al.  The Sociology of the Professions , 1988 .

[16]  E. Wenger,et al.  cultivating communities of practice , 2002 .

[17]  W. Wiegand : The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor , 1990 .

[18]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[19]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes , 2000, TCHI.

[20]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Towards knowledge-sharing and learning in virtual professional communities , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[22]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[23]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  Genres in action: negotiating genres in practice , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[24]  D. Wellman,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[25]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[26]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[27]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Empathic communities: balancing emotional and factual communication , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[28]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[29]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[30]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Organizational knowledge and communities of practice , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Marek Korczynski Communities of Coping: Collective Emotional Labour in Service Work , 2003 .

[32]  Stephen Fox Communities Of Practice, Foucault And Actor‐Network Therory , 2000 .

[33]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Carrie R. Leana The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism , 1998 .

[35]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Sense of virtual community - maintaining the experience of belonging , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[36]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[37]  J. Swan,et al.  The Construction of `Communities of Practice' in the Management of Innovation , 2002 .

[38]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations , 1994 .

[39]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[40]  Gary Burnett,et al.  Information exchange in virtual communities: a typology , 2000, Inf. Res..