A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities

ObjectivePatient and public involvement (PPI) in research has expanded nationally and internationally over the last decade, and recently there has been significant attention given to understanding its impact on research. Less attention has been given to the impact of PPI on the people involved, yet it has been shown that the success of PPI in research can be reliant on the processes of engagement between these individuals and communities. This paper therefore critically explores the impact of PPI on service users, researchers and communities involved in health and social care research.Data SourcesSearches were undertaken from 1995 to April 2012 in the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane library, CINAHL, HMIC and HELMIS. Searches were undertaken for grey literature using the databases InvoNet and NHS Evidence.Study SelectionStudies were included if they included the impact of PPI on individual service users, researchers or communities under research. Studies were excluded if they were in a foreign language (unless they were deemed critical to the systematic review) or were in children and adolescent services.Study AppraisalData were extracted using a narrative synthesis, and quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.Main ResultsService users reported feeling empowered and valued, gaining confidence and life skills. Researchers developed a greater understanding and insight into their research area, gaining respect and a good rapport with the community. The community involved in research became more aware and knowledgeable about their condition. However, lack of preparation and training led some service users to feel unable to contribute to the research, while other service users and communities reported feeling overburdened with the work involved. Researchers reported difficulties in incorporating PPI in meaningful ways due to lack of money and time.ConclusionThis is the first international systematic review to focus on the impact of PPI on the people involved in the process. The beneficial and challenging impacts reported highlight the importance of optimising the context and processes of involvement, so creating the potential for PPI to impact positively on the research itself.

[1]  J. Gater,et al.  Consumers leading public consultation: the general public's knowledge of stroke. , 2004, Family practice.

[2]  Angela Coulter,et al.  The European Patient Of The Future , 2003 .

[3]  M. Godfrey More than 'Involvement'. How Commissioning User Interviewers in the Research Process Begins to Change the Balance of Power , 2004 .

[4]  S. McCormick,et al.  Public Involvement in Breast Cancer Research: An Analysis and Model for Future Research , 2004, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[5]  V. Nadkarni,et al.  Exception From Informed Consent for Pediatric Resuscitation Research: Community Consultation for a Trial of Brain Cooling After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2004, Pediatrics.

[6]  J. Glasby,et al.  Cases for Change: User Involvement in Mental Health Services and Research , 2004 .

[7]  P. Rhodes,et al.  A service users' research advisory group from the perspectives of both service users and researchers. , 2002, Health & social care in the community.

[8]  Sally Brearley,et al.  Involving older people in research: methodological issues. , 2005, Health & social care in the community.

[9]  T. Ades,et al.  An analysis of advocacy: a collaborative essay. , 2002, Seminars in oncology nursing.

[10]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Psychosocial intervention for rural women with breast cancer , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[11]  Jatinder Singh,et al.  Critical appraisal skills programme , 2013 .

[12]  T. Abma Patient Participation in Health Research: Research With and for People With Spinal Cord Injuries , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[13]  Rachael Gooberman-Hill,et al.  Citizens’ juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[14]  S. Oliver,et al.  Involving consumers in a needs‐led research programme: a pilot project , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[15]  D Elbourne,et al.  Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  S. Ahmedzai,et al.  Overcoming the challenges to consumer involvement in cancer research , 2003, Health Expectations.

[17]  J. South,et al.  Participating in community research: exploring the experiences of lay researchers in Bradford , 2009 .

[18]  Право Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 , 2011 .

[19]  J. Manthorpe,et al.  Wise owls and professors: the role of older researchers in the review of the National Service Framework for Older People , 2008, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[20]  Philip Cotterell,et al.  Exploring the value of service user involvement in data analysis: ‘Our interpretation is about what lies below the surface’ , 2008 .

[21]  S. Ahmedzai,et al.  Can consumer research panels become an integral part of the cancer research community , 2005 .

[22]  Lisa Maher,et al.  Clients or colleagues? Reflections on the process of participatory action research with young injecting drug users , 2005 .

[23]  I. Tuffrey‐Wijne,et al.  Co‐researching with people with learning disabilities: an experience of involvement in qualitative data analysis , 2009, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[24]  Meredith Minkler,et al.  Participatory action research with older adults: key principles in practice. , 2009, The Gerontologist.

[25]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals. , 2002, Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine.

[26]  B. Schneider,et al.  Communication Between People With Schizophrenia and Their Medical Professionals: A Participatory Research Project , 2004, Qualitative health research.

[27]  Ann Brown,et al.  The impact of service user involvement in research. , 2005, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[28]  A new approach to empowering older people's forums: Identifying barriers to encourage participation , 2006 .

[29]  Judith Belam,et al.  A qualitative study of migraine involving patient researchers. , 2005, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[30]  S. Bannister,et al.  A Qualitative Study , 2009 .

[31]  C. Truman,et al.  Involving users in evaluation: The social relations of user participation in health research , 2001 .

[32]  Craig Moore,et al.  Engaging Communities in Area-based Regeneration: The Role of Participatory Evaluation , 2002 .

[33]  A. Howe,et al.  Ensuring public and patient participation in research: a case study in infrastructure development in one UK Research and Development consortium , 2006, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[34]  M. Minkler,et al.  Ethical Dilemmas in Participatory Action Research: A Case Study from the Disability Community , 2002, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[35]  Rod Hughes,et al.  Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[36]  M. Reed,et al.  Consumers as researchers – innovative experiences in UK National Health Service Research , 2010 .

[37]  S. Oliver,et al.  Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[38]  S. Maslin-Prothero Developing user involvement in research. , 2003, Journal of clinical nursing.

[39]  Sarah Dyer Rationalising public participation in the health service: the case of research ethics committees. , 2004, Health & place.

[40]  Jennie Popay,et al.  Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Version 1 , 2006 .

[41]  B. Dewar Beyond tokenistic involvement of older people in research - a framework for future development and understanding. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.

[42]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded. , 2004, Health policy.

[43]  Til Wykes,et al.  From passive subjects to equal partners , 2002, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[44]  Jane Johnston,et al.  Equal Lives? Disabled People Evaluate an Independent Living Strategy for Essex Social Services , 2004 .

[45]  M. Plumb,et al.  Funding community-based participatory research: lessons learned , 2004, Journal of interprofessional care.

[46]  T. Williamson,et al.  Impact of public involvement in research on quality of life and society: a case study of research career trajectories , 2010 .

[47]  Helen R. Bayliss,et al.  The PIRICOM study : a systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patients and public involvement in health and social care research , 2010 .

[48]  Hugh McLaughlin,et al.  Involving Young Service Users as Co-Researchers: Possibilities, Benefits and Costs , 2005 .

[49]  L. Liburd,et al.  Maximizing Participation by Black Americans in Population-Based Diabetes Research: The Project Direct Pilot Experience , 1998, Journal of Community Health.

[50]  M. Weiss,et al.  Involving patients as advisors in pharmacy practice research: what are the benefits? , 2008 .

[51]  A. Rowe The effect of involvement in participatory research on parent researchers in a Sure Start programme. , 2006, Health & social care in the community.

[52]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Consumer involvement in consent document development: a multicenter cluster randomized trial to assess study participants' understanding , 2006, Clinical trials.

[53]  T. Abma,et al.  Collaboration and co‐ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team , 2012, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[54]  Frances Griffiths,et al.  The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. , 2012, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[55]  B. N. Ong,et al.  Involving users in low back pain research , 2003, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[56]  S. Staniszewska,et al.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review , 2014, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[57]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Consumer‐driven health care: Building partnerships in research , 2005, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[58]  A. Langston,et al.  An integrated approach to consumer representation and involvement in a multicentre randomized controlled trial , 2005, Clinical trials.

[59]  Ian Robinson,et al.  Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[60]  H. Mannan,et al.  Parents as co‐researchers: a participatory action research initiative involving parents of people with intellectual disabilities in Ireland , 2009 .

[61]  N. Britten,et al.  The impact of consumer involvement in research: an evaluation of consumer involvement in the London Primary Care Studies Programme. , 2008, Family practice.

[62]  B. Svensson,et al.  Mental health users' experiences of being interviewed by another user in a research project. A qualitative study , 2010, Journal of mental health.

[63]  Rosemary Barber,et al.  The GRIPP checklist: Strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research , 2011, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[64]  Geraldine Dickson, Kathryn L. Green PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH: LESSONS LEARNED WITH ABORIGINAL GRANDMOTHERS , 2001, Health care for women international.

[65]  Eva Elliott,et al.  Harnessing expertise: involving peer interviewers in qualitative research with hard‐to‐reach populations , 2002, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[66]  N. Kearney,et al.  A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[67]  L. Maclean,et al.  Immigrant Women Implementing Participatory Research in Health Promotion , 2003, Western journal of nursing research.

[68]  A. Cheadle,et al.  Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Address Social Determinants of Health: Lessons Learned from Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities , 2002, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[69]  D. MacInnes,et al.  The development of a tool to measure service user satisfaction with in-patient forensic services: The Forensic Satisfaction Scale , 2010, Journal of mental health.