Two-level procedure based on HICAGA to determine optimal number, locations and operating points of SVCs in Isfahan–Khuzestan power system to maximise loadability and minimise losses, TVD and SVC installation cost
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Sergio Bruno,et al. Unified power flow controllers for security-constrained transmission management , 2004 .
[2] M. Tavakoli Bina,et al. Simultaneous application of multi-type FACTS devices to the restructured environment: achieving both optimal number and location , 2010 .
[3] Innocent Kamwa,et al. Analysing the effects of different types of FACTS devices on the steady-state performance of the Hydro-Québec network , 2014 .
[4] Pierluigi Siano,et al. Selection of optimal number and location of thyristor-controlled phase shifters using genetic based algorithms , 2004 .
[5] Michael Negnevitsky,et al. Loadability of power systems and optimal SVC placement , 2013 .
[6] Maarouf Saad,et al. Authenticated voltage control of partitioned power networks with optimal allocation of STATCOM using heuristic algorithm , 2013 .
[7] Ya-Chin Chang. Multi-Objective Optimal SVC Installation for Power System Loading Margin Improvement , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.
[8] G. C. Ejebe,et al. Available transfer capability calculations , 1998 .
[9] R D Zimmerman,et al. MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.
[10] Innocent Kamwa,et al. Optimal placement of multiple-type FACTS devices to maximize power system loadability using a generic graphical user interface , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.