Purpose – This chapter addresses the participation of women (or lack of it) in industrial research and development (R&D), one of the key indicators of innovation.
Methodology/approach – The empirical investigation is based on a sample of 84 science- and technology-based small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), engaged in new product development and innovation, operating in the United Kingdom.
Findings – The results demonstrate that the participation of women in R&D employment, particularly at senior levels, in the SME sector operating in England, is extremely low, partly attributed to some specific challenges faced by science and R&D-based SMEs. As a result of under-representation in the scientific research, women are missing out on the opportunities that are offered by ‘open innovation’ activities such as university–industry collaboration, access to external networks, exchange of knowledge and ideas and working on joint innovation projects with other scientific researchers elsewhere.
Research limitations/implications – There is a need for more rigorous research at firm levels to examine the cumulative effects of factors that could be translated into policy measures in order to attract more women to industrial research.
Practical implications – Specific policy measures should also focus on addressing barriers faced by SMEs to meet the specific needs of their female R&D employees, particularly those expecting or looking after young children while undertaking scientific research in laboratories.
Social implications – There is a need to raise a greater awareness and promote the take-up of numerous specific positive action measures, networking platforms and other promotional activities amongst women working in the private sectors, particularly those working in isolation in laboratories.
Originality/value of chapter – The findings are, fundamentally, based on an original and unique database. Women in industrial R&D is relatively a new topic of policy and research and their participation in R&D team within the science and technology-based SMEs in England has not been investigated before.
[1]
J. Steinke.
A portrait of a woman as a scientist: breaking down barriers created by gender-role stereotypes
,
1997
.
[2]
Pooran Wynarczyk,et al.
Providing the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Skills of Tomorrow
,
2009
.
[3]
Pooran Wynarczyk.
The Impact of Connectivity Technologies on E-Flexible Working Practices of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the North East of England
,
2005
.
[4]
Pooran Wynarczyk,et al.
Building the science and innovation base: work, skills and employment issues
,
2009
.
[5]
Rereading Becker: Contextualizing the Development of Discrimination Theory
,
2005
.
[6]
Harry Scarbrough,et al.
Evaluating human capital: An exploratory study of management practice.
,
2004
.
[7]
Pooran Wynarczyk,et al.
The “gender gap” in the scientific labour market: The case of science, engineering and technology‐based SMEs in the UK
,
2006
.
[8]
J. Blickenstaff.
Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?
,
2005
.
[9]
P. Wynarczyk.
Addressing the “gender gap” in the managerial labour market: The case of scientific small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) in the North East of England
,
2007
.
[10]
S. Erduran,et al.
Ideas, evidence and argument in science education
,
2006
.