论文信息 - Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists

Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists

The authors apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information science. Faculty rankings based on raw citation counts are compared with those based on h-counts. There is a strong positive correlation between the two sets of rankings. It is shown how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar’s research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.

Lokman I. Meho | Blaise Cronin | B. Cronin

[1] J. E. Hirsch,et al. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[2] Blaise Cronin,et al. Postscript on program rankings , 1996 .

[3] Lokman I. Meho,et al. Ranking the Research Productivity of LIS Faculty and Schools: An Evaluation of Data Sources and Research Methods , 2005 .

[4] Lokman I. Meho,et al. Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: An evaluation of data sources and research methods , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5] Philip Ball,et al. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists , 2005, Nature.

[6] J. Budd. Erratum: June 15, 2000 , 2000, The Library Quarterly.

[7] Helmut Hasse,et al. Number Theory , 2020, An Introduction to Probabilistic Number Theory.

[8] J. Budd. Scholarly Productivity of U.S. LIS Faculty: An Update , 2000, The Library Quarterly.

[9] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? , 2005, Scientometrics.