Analysis of phosphorus by 31PNMR in Oxisols under agroforestry and conventional coffee systems in Brazil

Abstract Phosphorus (P) is the primary limiting nutrient for crop production in highly weathered tropical soils. The deficiency is mainly caused by strong adsorption of H2PO4− to Al- and Fe-(hydr)oxides, which turns large proportions of total P into a form that is unavailable to plants. Soil management modifies P dynamics. Some plants, including trees used in agroforestry systems, are known to accelerate P cycling. The objective of this paper was to use phosphorus 31 nuclear magnetic resonance (31PNMR) to evaluate the inorganic (Pi) and organic P (Po) compounds in Oxisol from two agroforestry (15 and 19 years old) and two conventional (full-sun, monoculture, ca. 15–20 and 20–24 years) coffee systems at three different depths (2–3, 10–15 and 40–60 cm). We hypothesised that the amounts of (1) organic P and (2) diester are higher in agroforestry fields than in conventional coffee fields and (3) the organic P and the diester decrease less with depth in the agroforestry systems than in the conventional systems. The soils were sampled from on-farm experiments in the Atlantic Coastal Rainforest, Brazil. The soil P was extracted with NaOH 0.5 M+EDTA 0.1 M. Resin chelex-X100 was used to remove the paramagnetic ions. The total P in the NaOH–EDTA extract was measured through ICP and the Pi by the ammonium molybdate–ascorbic acid method. Po was calculated as the difference between total P and Pi. The amount of Po was higher, the decrease of Po with depth was more sharp and the Po/total P was lower in the conventional systems than in the agroforestry systems. Based on literature and standards, 31PNMR signals were interpreted as inorganic orthophosphate, orthophosphate monoester (inositol phosphates and mononucleotides), orthophosphate diester (phospholipids, nucleic acids and teichoic acid) and pyrophosphates. The proportion of organic P (Po) was on average 47%, consisting of monoester (95%) and diester (5%). The amounts of diester phosphates did not differ between systems, but the proportion of diester to total spectra areas was higher and the decrease of diester with depth was less in the agroforestry than in the conventional systems. The proportions of inorganic P to total P consisted on average of 45% orthophosphate and 8% pyrophosphate. Our results suggest that agroforestry systems influence the dynamics of P through the conversion of part of the inorganic P into organic P. The effect was higher in deeper layers. Because the rate of cycling is higher for organic P than for inorganic P and for diester than for monoester, and because the P in deep layers is normally less available to crop plants, agroforestry would maintain larger fractions of P available to agricultural crops, thereby reducing P losses to the unavailable pools. The rate and the impacts of these changes on P cycling and efficiency of P use of the crops in the long-term need to be further examined and understood, for full evaluation of the importance of agroforestry in soil P utilisation.

[1]  C. Johansen,et al.  Phosphorus Uptake by Pigeon Pea and Its Role in Cropping Systems of the Indian Subcontinent , 1990, Science.

[2]  A. Young Agroforestry for Soil Management , 1997 .

[3]  P. Cooper,et al.  Agroforestry and the Mitigation of Land Degradation in the Humid and Sub-humid Tropics of Africa , 1996, Experimental Agriculture.

[4]  K. Cassman,et al.  Inorganic and organic phosphorus dynamics during a build-up and decline of available phosphorus in an ultisol , 1997 .

[5]  D. Powlson,et al.  A 31P nuclear magnetic resonance study of the phosphorus species in alkali extracts of soils from long‐term field experiments , 1984 .

[6]  T. Zhang,et al.  Nature of soil organic phosphorus as affected by long-term fertilization under continuous corn (Zea mays L.) : A 31P NMR study , 1999 .

[7]  A. Richardson,et al.  Prospects for using soil microorganisms to improve the acquisition of phosphorus by plants , 2001 .

[8]  B. Christensen,et al.  Land-use and fertilization effects on P forms in two European soils: resin extraction and 31P-NMR analysis , 1996 .

[9]  C. Palm Contribution of agroforestry trees to nutrient requirements of intercropped plants , 1995, Agroforestry Systems.

[10]  M. Brossard,et al.  Assessing organic phosphorus status of Cerrado oxisols (Brazil) using 31P-NMR spectroscopy and phosphomonoesterase activity measurement , 2001 .

[11]  E. Fernandes,et al.  Managing ground cover heterogeneity in coffee (Coffea arabica L.) under managed tree shade: from replicated plots to farmer practice. , 1999 .

[12]  J. Magid,et al.  Dynamics of Organic Phosphorus in Soils under Natural and Agricultural Ecosystems , 1996 .

[13]  Donald L. Kass,et al.  Agroforestry for Soil Management, 2nd Ed. , 1999 .

[14]  R. Newman,et al.  Nature and distribution of soil phosphorus as revealed by a sequential extraction method followed by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance analysis , 1985 .

[15]  I. Anghinoni,et al.  Organic and inorganic phosphorus as characterized by phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance in subtropical soils under management systems , 2002 .

[16]  J. Stewart,et al.  Dynamics of soil organic phosphorus , 1987 .

[17]  M. R. Sá A ferro e fogo: a história e a devastação da Mata Atlântica Brasileira , 1996 .

[18]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  A literature review and evaluation of the. Hedley fractionation: Applications to the biogeochemical cycle of soil phosphorus in natural ecosystems , 1995 .

[19]  M. B. David,et al.  Characterization of Phosphorus in a Spruce-Fir Spodosol by Phosphorus-31 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , 1996 .

[20]  B. Cade-Menun,et al.  A comparison of soil extraction procedures for 31P NMR spectroscopy , 1996 .

[21]  J. P. Riley,et al.  A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters , 1962 .

[22]  M. Adams,et al.  31P-NMR analysis of phosphorus compounds in extracts of surface soils from selected karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor F. Muell.) forests , 1989 .

[23]  M. Fontes,et al.  Phosphate adsorption by clays from Brazilian Oxisols: relationships with specific surface area and mineralogy , 1996 .

[24]  E. J. Udo,et al.  Phosphorus Fractions in Selected Nigerian Soils 1 , 1977 .

[25]  R. H. Newman,et al.  Soil phosphorus characterisation by 31p nuclear magnetic resonance , 1980 .

[26]  Irene Guijt,et al.  Continual learning for agroforestry system design: university, NGO and farmer partnership in Minas Gerais, Brazil , 2001 .

[27]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[28]  W. Rice ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  E. Fernandes,et al.  Agroforestry in Sustainable Agricultural Systems , 1998 .

[30]  R. Newman,et al.  Phosphorus fractions of a climosequence of soils in New zealand tussock grassland , 1982 .

[31]  K. Reddy,et al.  Combined Chemical and 31P-NMR Spectroscopic Analysis of Phosphorus in Wetland Organic SOILS1 , 1998 .

[32]  W. Zech,et al.  31P-NMR characterization of phosphorus fractions in natural and fertilized forest soils , 2001 .

[33]  W. Cropper,et al.  NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS CYCLING IN AN AMAZONIAN AGROFOREST EIGHT YEARS FOLLOWING FOREST CONVERSION , 2000 .

[34]  J. A. Chudek,et al.  Use of 31P-NMR to study the forms of phosphorus in peat soils , 1994 .

[35]  Nelson G. Hairston,et al.  Ecological Experiments: Purpose, Design and Execution , 1989 .

[36]  J. Francis Statistica for Windows , 1995 .

[37]  R. Dalai Soil Organic Phosphorus , 1977 .

[38]  B. Glaser,et al.  Effects of deforestation on phosphorus pools in mountain soils of the Alay Range, Khyrgyzia , 2000, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[39]  M. R. Carter,et al.  Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis , 1993 .