Perceptions and Experiences of Privacy Among Persons With an Ostomy Receiving Treatment and Care

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine ostomy patients' experiences and opinions on protection of privacy during treatment and care. DESIGN: Mixed-methods, descriptive correlational study. SAMPLE AND SETTING: The study sample comprised 80 patients with an ostomy receiving treatment and care in a university hospital in Turkey. METHODS: Data were collected using a form developed by the researchers based on literature review. The survey consisted of statements that examined demographic characteristics, experiences, and opinions of patients with an ostomy. RESULTS: For participants, 64.8% (n = 35/54) defined privacy from a physical dimension, 64.1% (n = 25/39) suffered from ostomy-related psychosocial discomfort, 48.7% experienced ostomy-related discomfort mostly during nursing care (n = 19/39), 48.7% (n = 39/80) were uncomfortable when their ostomy was seen by others, Approximately 56.3% (n = 45/80) thought that they disturbed other patients and their families during ostomy care, and 46.3% (n = 37/80) stated that healthcare professionals discussed information about their ostomy when other patients and their families were present. In addition, 21.3% (n = 17/80) opined that the physical conditions of patient rooms failed to provide privacy. Analysis revealed no significant relationship between education levels and reading the Patient Rights Regulation (P = .129). Analysis also found no significant relationships between age (P = .086), marital status (P = .382), educational background (P = .143), hospitalization experience (P = .427), and satisfaction with perceptions of privacy when receiving ostomy care. CONCLUSION: Patients with an ostomy reported physical and psychosocial problems concerning privacy, felt uncomfortable about the way information on their ostomy was discussed, and thought that physical conditions were not suitable for ostomy care. We recommend that healthcare professionals be provided with more training on psychosocial problems and privacy for patients with ostomy and that institutional policies and procedures be developed to address patients' problems.

[1]  Jeanine Gleba,et al.  Ostomy and Continent Diversion Patient Bill of Rights , 2022, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[2]  Elif Akyüz,et al.  Surgical nurses’ knowledge and practices about informed consent , 2018, Nursing ethics.

[3]  A. Ebadi,et al.  Respecting the privacy of hospitalized patients: An integrative review. , 2018, Nursing ethics.

[4]  Ostomy Wound WOCN Society Clinical Guideline: Management of the Adult Patient With a Fecal or Urinary Ostomy-An Executive Summary. , 2018, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[5]  A. Brødsgaard,et al.  The Lived Experiences of Persons Hospitalized for Construction of an Urgent Fecal Ostomy , 2017, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[6]  B. Quintard,et al.  Patient education interventions for colorectal cancer patients with stoma: A systematic review. , 2017, Patient education and counseling.

[7]  Kyunghee Kim,et al.  Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of privacy protection behaviours and information provision , 2017, Nursing ethics.

[8]  C. Yuan,et al.  Quality of Life in Chinese Persons Living With an Ostomy: A Multisite Cross-sectional Study , 2017, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[9]  Ai-Hua Yang,et al.  The development status of specialized nursing in ostomy care both in China and abroad , 2016 .

[10]  V. Santos,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life in Persons With Ostomies Managed in an Outpatient Care Setting , 2016, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[11]  Diana S. Pope,et al.  Acoustic assessment of speech privacy curtains in two nursing units , 2016, Noise & health.

[12]  B. Richardson,et al.  Healthcare experiences of patients following faecal output stoma-forming surgery: a qualitative exploration. , 2014, International journal of nursing studies.

[13]  N. Serenko,et al.  Patients’ perceptions of privacy and their outcomes in healthcare , 2013 .

[14]  Elif Akyüz,et al.  Surgical patients’ and nurses’ opinions and expectations about privacy in care , 2013, Nursing ethics.

[15]  Malcolm Moore,et al.  Patients’ attitudes towards privacy in a Nepalese public hospital: a cross-sectional survey , 2013, BMC Research Notes.

[16]  Heather Draper,et al.  Telecare, Surveillance, and the Welfare State , 2012, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[17]  N. Nayeri,et al.  Patients’ privacy and satisfaction in the emergency department: A descriptive analytical study , 2010, Nursing ethics.

[18]  Hülya Üstünda,et al.  Stomali Hastalarda Beden Đmaji ve Benlik Saygisi BODY IMAGE AND SELF-ESTEEM IN PATIENTS WITH STOMA , 2007 .

[19]  Esra Kılıç,et al.  [The effect of permanent ostomy on body image, self-esteem, marital adjustment, and sexual functioning]. , 2007, Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry.

[20]  B. Thomsen,et al.  Quality of life of Danish colorectal cancer patients with and without a stoma , 2007, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[21]  Jonathan Karro,et al.  Patient perceptions of privacy infringements in an emergency department , 2005, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[22]  H. Leino‐Kilpi,et al.  Perceptions of Privacy in the Care of Elderly People in Five European Countries , 2003, Nursing ethics.

[23]  Victoria Arrowsmith Patient's Autonomy, Privacy and Informed Consent , 2002 .

[24]  M. Szezepkowski Do we still need a permanent colostomy in XXI-st century? , 2002 .

[25]  M. Välimäki,et al.  Patient's Autonomy, Privacy and Informed Consent , 2000 .

[26]  K. Wikblad,et al.  Privacy in hospital. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[27]  L. Veitch,et al.  EVALUATION OF NURSE AND MIDWIFE , 1997 .

[28]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Maintaining and Restoring Privacy through Communication in Different Types of Relationships , 1989 .

[29]  I. Altman A Conceptual Analysis , 1976 .