Comparison of Transepidermal Water Loss and Laser Scanning Microscopy Measurements to Assess Their Value in the Characterization of Cutaneous Barrier Defects

The exact qualitative and quantitative analysis of wound healing processes is a decisive prerequisite for optimizing wound care and for therapy control. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements are considered to be the standard procedure for assessing the progress of epidermal wound healing. The damage to the stratum corneum correlates with an increased loss of water through the skin barrier. This method is highly susceptible to failure by environmental factors, in particular by temperature and moisture. This study was aimed at comparing TEWL measurements and in vivo laser scanning microscopy (LSM) for the characterization of the epidermal wound healing process. LSM is a high-resolution in vivo method permitting to analyze the kinetics and dynamics of wound healing at a cellular level. While the TEWL values for the individual volunteers showed a wide scattering, LSM permitted the wound healing process to be clearly characterized at the cellular level. However, a comparison between the two methods was very difficult, because the results provided by LSM were images and not numerical. Therefore, a scoring system was set up which evaluates the stages of wound healing. Thus, the healing process could be numerically described. This method is independent of any environmental factors. Providing morphologically qualitative and numerically quantitative analyses of the wound healing process and being far less vulnerable to failure, LSM is advantageous over TEWL.

[1]  B. Atiyeh,et al.  Scar Quality and Physiologic Barrier Function Restoration After Moist and Moist‐Exposed Dressings of Partial‐Thickness Wounds , 2003, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[2]  Maxim E. Darvin,et al.  In vivo Raman spectroscopy detects increased epidermal antioxidative potential with topically applied carotenoids , 2008 .

[3]  J. Lademann,et al.  In-vivo diagnosis and non-inasive monitoring of Imiquimod 5% cream for non-melanoma skin cancer using confocal laser scanning microscopy , 2008 .

[4]  Heike Richter,et al.  Analysis of the melanin distribution in different ethnic groups by in vivo laser scanning microscopy , 2009 .

[5]  R O Potts,et al.  The influence of stratum corneum morphology on water permeability. , 1991, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[6]  L. Germain,et al.  Skin Substitutes and Wound Healing , 2009, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[7]  W. Sterry,et al.  Comparison of Transepidermal Water Loss and Spectroscopic Absorbance to Quantify Changes of the Stratum corneum after Tape Stripping , 2005, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[8]  M. Fartasch.  The nature of the epidermal barrier: structural aspects , 1996 .

[9]  J. Lademann,et al.  Application of optical non-invasive methods in skin physiology , 2008 .

[10]  A. Kligman,et al.  Barrier Functions of Human Skin: A Holistic View , 2009, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[11]  K. Vávrová,et al.  Short-Chain Ceramides Decrease Skin Barrier Properties , 2008, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[12]  V. Gelikonov,et al.  Optical method for the screening of doping substances , 2008 .

[13]  U. Blume-Peytavi,et al.  Influence of Bathing or Washing on Skin Barrier Function in Newborns during the First Four Weeks of Life , 2009, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[14]  R. Clark,et al.  Tissue Engineering for Cutaneous Wounds: Selecting the Proper Time and Space for Growth Factors, Cells and the Extracellular Matrix , 2009, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[15]  E. Berardesca,et al.  The Influence of a Non-Occlusive Bi-Layer Composite Membrane on Skin Barrier Properties , 2007, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[16]  A. Kimball,et al.  Effects of moisturization on epidermal homeostasis and differentiation , 2006, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[17]  R. Wickett,et al.  Effect of semipermeable membranes on skin barrier repair following tape stripping , 2001, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[18]  U. Kiistala,et al.  IN-VIVO SEPARATION OF EPIDERMIS BY PRODUCTION OF SUCTION BLISTERS. , 1964, Lancet.

[19]  J. Lademann,et al.  Determination of the thickness and structure of the skin barrier by in vivo laser scanning microscopy , 2008 .

[20]  J. Lademann,et al.  Formation of a protection film on the human skin by microparticles , 2008 .

[21]  Maxim E. Darvin,et al.  Influence of two different IR radiators on the antioxidative potential of the human skin , 2009 .