Computer-aided classification of breast cancer nuclei.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy affecting the female population in industrialized countries. Prognostic factors, such as steroid receptors visualized in biopsy slides, provide critical information to oncologists regarding the hormonal status of the individual tumors. These factors influence the choice of treatment and help in predicting patient survival and probability of recurrence. The objective of this paper is to introduce a new computer-aided system for the classification of breast cancer nuclei based on neural networks. Currently, medical experts assess steroid receptors in breast cancer biopsy slides mostly manually using four- or five-level grading schemes. These schemes are based on the assessment of two parameters: number of nuclei positive and their staining intensity. Available computerized systems define their own grading schemes based on automated measurements of low-level features, such as optical density, texture, area, and others. However, the findings produced by these systems may not be readily comprehensible by the majority of medical experts who have been accustomed to manual assessment schemes. Moreover, findings from one system cannot be directly compared to findings obtained from other computerized systems. To date, no standardized assessment scheme exists for computerized systems, while interobserver and intraobserver variabilities limit the utility of the routinely used manual assessment schemes. In this paper a new system for computer-aided biopsy analysis is introduced. Here, we focus on the system's nuclear classification module. The input to this module consists of a set of six local and global features: optical density, two chromaticity indices, a variance based texture measure, global nuclei density mean, and variance. The output of the nuclei classification module consists of a membership label in a zero to four grading scheme for each detected nucleus. The classification module is based on a feedforward neural network trained in a supervised fashion to classify the nuclear feature vectors. The sample data comprises 3015 nuclei from 28 images that were classified by a human expert. A Sammon plot visualization of the six dimensional input feature space shows that the classification problem is quite difficult. The neural network used in the classification module achieved 72% accuracy. Our result indicate that by using a nuclear classification module such as the one introduced in this paper it is possible to translate low-level system measurements into a vocabulary that is familiar to medical experts. Thus, a contribution is made to the standardization of grading schemes in addition to improving the accuracy in grading breast cancer nuclei.

[1]  L. Andrac,et al.  Multiparametric study (SAMBA 200) of estrogen receptor immunocytochemical assay in 400 human breast carcinomas: analysis of estrogen receptor distribution heterogeneity in tissues and correlations with dextran coated charcoal assays and morphological data. , 1988, Cancer research.

[2]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Pattern recognition : a statistical approach , 1982 .

[3]  Jorge Herbert de Lira,et al.  Two-Dimensional Signal and Image Processing , 1989 .

[4]  J. Y. Mary,et al.  Quantitative Image Analysis in Cancer Cytology and Histology , 1987 .

[5]  Anil K. Jain Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[6]  William Nick Street,et al.  Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis Via Linear Programming , 1995, Oper. Res..

[7]  E B Cox,et al.  Clinical response to hormone therapy correlated with estrogen receptor analyses. Biochemical v histochemical methods. , 1984, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[8]  Shang-Liang Chen,et al.  Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks , 1991, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[9]  D. Weinberg,et al.  Nuclear grading of breast carcinoma by image analysis. Classification by multivariate and neural network analysis. , 1991, American journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  Constantinos S. Pattichis,et al.  Detection of cell nuclei in breast biopsies using receptive fields , 1994, Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  F T Bosman,et al.  Quality control in immunocytochemistry: experiences with the oestrogen receptor assay. , 1992, Journal of clinical pathology.

[12]  R Albert,et al.  Three-dimensional image processing for morphometric analysis of epithelium sections. , 1992, Cytometry.

[13]  J. Bacus,et al.  The evaluation of estrogen receptor in primary breast carcinoma by computer-assisted image analysis. , 1988, American journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[15]  John W. Sammon,et al.  A Nonlinear Mapping for Data Structure Analysis , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[16]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[17]  L. True,et al.  Quantitative immunohistochemistry: a new tool for surgical pathology? , 1988, American journal of clinical pathology.

[18]  T. Reichert,et al.  EGFR and PCNA expression in oral squamous cell carcinomas--a valuable tool in estimating the patient's prognosis. , 1993, European journal of cancer. Part B, Oral oncology.

[19]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELD TAXONOMY , 1990 .