Estimation of the delay of network devices in hybrid wired/wireless real-time industrial communication systems

Recent advances in the field of hybrid communication systems for factory automation have shown that the processing delay introduced by some network components may severely affect the performances of the communication system, introducing a high degree of randomness in the delivery time of packets. Real-time behavior could result not effectively satisfied and a high number of deadlines might result lost. Measurements are hence needed in order to obtain a statistical description of such network devices: an information that is in turn useful at the design stage of an automation network. To this aim an original and effective method providing the required analysis is presented, exploiting a simple measurement setup and low instrumentation efforts. It is based on a substitution approach, in which a closed loop network is at first characterized. The actual Device Under Test (DUT) is subsequently included in the measurement loop. The DUT characterization is obtained applying a suitable deconvolution algorithm to the data collected in these two steps. An experimental session involving real devices is finally provided, showing the performances of the proposed measurement approach. Theory and comments to the obtained results may also provide specific guidance to a designer in order to optimize the performances of a control network.

[1]  Matteo Bertocco,et al.  On the Rate Adaptation Techniques of IEEE 802.11 Networks for Industrial Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[2]  Andreas Willig,et al.  Recent and Emerging Topics in Wireless Industrial Communications: A Selection , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[3]  S. Carlsen,et al.  WirelessHART Versus ISA100.11a: The Format War Hits the Factory Floor , 2011, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[4]  Suk Lee,et al.  Integration of mobile vehicles for automated material handling using Profibus and IEEE 802.11 networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[5]  Bogdan M. Wilamowski,et al.  Industrial Communication Systems , 2011 .

[6]  Henry Shu-Hung Chung,et al.  A 31-level cascade inverter for power applications , 2002, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[7]  Richard Zurawski Special Issue on Industrial Communication Systems , 2005, Proc. IEEE.

[8]  Andreas Willig,et al.  Retransmission Strategies for Cyclic Polling Over Wireless Channels in the Presence of Interference , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[9]  Matteo Bertocco,et al.  Design of experiments for the assessment of coexistence between wireless networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[10]  Federico Tramarin,et al.  Experimental evaluation of the service time for industrial hybrid (wired/wireless) networks under non-ideal environmental conditions , 2011, ETFA2011.

[11]  Federico Tramarin,et al.  Influence of real components behavior on the performance of wireless industrial communication systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[12]  Matteo Bertocco,et al.  A cross-layer simulator for industrial wireless communication systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements and Networking Proceedings (M&N).

[13]  Daniele Marioli,et al.  IEEE802.11 sensor networking , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  Jean-Dominique Decotignie,et al.  Ethernet-Based Real-Time and Industrial Communications , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  T. Sauter,et al.  The continuing evolution of integration in manufacturing automation , 2007, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.