Options‐Based Multi‐Objective Evaluation of Product Platforms

A platform is the set of elements and interfaces that are common to a family of products. Design teams must choose among feasible platform concepts upon which a product family could be based, often involving new technologies. Multiple performance objectives need to be considered. A standard approach is to convert the performance outcomes into financial figures, which can then be weighed against the required investments. However, it is not always possible to transform performance outcomes (benefits) into monetary terms, such as in defense or highly technical projects. A multi-objective form of real-options-based platform selection is developed. Systems are compared based on multiple technical and economic goals, incorporating uncertainty by representing the unknown factors during the subsequent development process with probability distributions. The range of uncertain outcomes is integrated into single expected measures of effectiveness, which can then be applied to select the most appropriate platform and set of support product variants. An application to the design of platform-based families of naval high-speed ships is shown.

[1]  James Edwin Neely.  Improving the valuation of research and development : a composite of real options, decision analysis and benefit valuation frameworks , 1998 .

[2]  J.P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  Platform-based spacecraft design: a formulation and implementation procedure , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[3]  F. Mistree,et al.  Fuzzy compromise: An effective way to solve hierarchical design problems , 1992 .

[4]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  A PRODUCT PLATFORM CONCEPT EXPLORATION METHOD FOR PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN , 1999 .

[5]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Incorporating lifecycle costs into product architecture decisions , 2001 .

[6]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[7]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  ASSESSING VALUE FOR PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN AND SELECTION , 1999 .

[8]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  THE COMPROMISE DECISION SUPPORT PROBLEM AND THE ADAPTIVE LINEAR PROGRAMMING ALGORITHM , 1998 .

[9]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  A Method for Architecting Product Platforms , 2000 .

[10]  Matthew B. Parkinson,et al.  MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION IN PRODUCT PLATFORM DESIGN , 1999, DAC 1999.

[11]  Paul Garvey,et al.  Probability Methods for Cost Uncertainty Analysis: A Systems Engineering Perspective, Second Edition , 2000 .

[12]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  Models for platform-based product family design , 2000 .

[13]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The Power of Product Platforms , 1997 .

[14]  Clifford A. Whitcomb.  Naval ship design philosophy implementation , 1998 .

[15]  Susan Walsh Sanderson,et al.  Cost models for evaluating virtual design strategies in multicycle product families , 1991 .

[16]  Mark V. Martin,et al.  DESIGN FOR VARIETY: DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEXITY INDICES AND DESIGN CHARTS , 1998 .

[17]  T. W. Faulkner.  Applying ‘Options Thinking’ To R&D Valuation , 1996 .

[18]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Architecture Definition Based Upon Customer Demands , 1999 .

[19]  Lawrence D. Miles,et al.  Techniques Of Value Analysis And Engineering , 1961 .

[20]  Eugene F. Brigham,et al.  Principles of Finance , 1999 .

[21]  S. Sanderson,et al.  Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman , 1995 .