Effect of foot-progression angle on hip joint moments during gait.

Loosening has emerged as the most serious long-term complication of total hip replacement and torsional loading of the femoral implant has been implicated as a possible cause. In an effort to explore a strategy for minimizing this risk, the following hypothesis was tested: the foot-progression angle has a significant effect on the resultant hip moments, and particularly the internal-external rotation moment, during level walking. Twelve normal subjects performed a total of nine trials: three in which they walked normally with the right foot pointing approximately straight ahead; three in which they were told to walk with the foot internally rotated approximately 30 degrees; and three in which the foot was externally rotated about 30 degrees. The inverse dynamics approach was used to integrate the body segment parameter, kinematic and force plate data, and to solve for the resultant moment at the right hip joint. In all three conditions--foot straight, foot in, and foot out-the subjects walked at the same average speed of 1.5 (+/- 0.3) ms-1. For the flexion-extension moment (where the maximum flexion moment of 95 Nm was in good agreement with other published data), there was no significant difference between the three foot orientation conditions. For the abduction-adduction moment, the foot straight condition exhibited the classic double peak pattern with a maximum abductor moment of 57 Nm, and there was no statistically significant difference between the three curves.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  M P Kadaba,et al.  Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  N Berme,et al.  Load actions transmitted by implants. , 1979, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[3]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Failed innovation in total hip replacement. Diagnosis and proposals for a cure. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  T. Oberg,et al.  Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10-79 years of age. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  J. Apkarian,et al.  A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic model of the lower limb. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Control Division,et al.  Biomechanics of normal and prosthetic gait , 1987 .

[8]  T W Phillips,et al.  Loosening of cementless femoral stems: a biomechanical analysis of immediate fixation with loading vertical, femur horizontal. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Morris Milner,et al.  An Optimality Criterion for Processing Electromyographic (EMG) Signals Relating to Human Locomotion , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  D T Davy,et al.  Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total arthroplasty. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Three dimensional stress analysis of the femoral stem of a total hip prosthesis. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  M P Kadaba,et al.  On the estimation of joint kinematics during gait. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  S. Canale,et al.  Campbell's operative orthopaedics , 1987 .

[14]  G Selvik,et al.  Instability of total hip prostheses at rotational stress. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. , 1984, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[15]  R W Mann,et al.  Contact pressures from an instrumented hip endoprosthesis. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  J. G. Andrews,et al.  A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.