Causal learning in the Crib: A predictive processing formalization and babybot simulation

Predictive Processing (PP) [1], [2], [3] is becoming an influential account in cognitive neuroscience, including developmental neuroscience [4]. According to PP, human brains interpret their sensory inputs by predicting them, based on a hierarchy of generative models. These predictions are then compared to the actual, observed inputs, and the difference between predictions and observations (so-called prediction error) is used to update the agent's generative model about the world, to minimize future prediction errors. A key question for PP is how situated agents can learn these generative models. This question is especially important from a developmental perspective on PP. That is, the theory needs to specify how such generative models can be ‘developable’ at all, given that infants must somehow build these generative models from embodied, situated interaction with their environments.

[1]  P. Rochat Object Manipulation and Exploration in 2-to 5-Month-Old Infants , 2001 .

[2]  H. Bekkering,et al.  To be precise, the details don’t matter: On predictive processing, precision, and level of detail of predictions , 2017, Brain and Cognition.

[3]  L. G. Neuberg CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING, AND INFERENCE, by Judea Pearl, Cambridge University Press, 2000 , 2003, Econometric Theory.

[4]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[5]  P. L. Adams THE ORIGINS OF INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN , 1976 .

[6]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  E. Thelen,et al.  Exploration and selection in the early acquisition of skill. , 1994, International review of neurobiology.

[8]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Top-down modulation in the infant brain: Learning-induced expectations rapidly affect the sensory cortex at 6 months , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[10]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Active learning of inverse models with intrinsically motivated goal exploration in robots , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Action understanding and active inference , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  C. K. Rovee,et al.  Conjugate reinforcement of infant exploratory behavior. , 1969, Journal of experimental child psychology.