Interdisciplinarity and Research on Local Issues: Evidence from a Developing Country

This paper examines the role of interdisciplinarity on research pertaining to local issues. Using Colombian publications from 1991 until 2011 in the Web of Science, we investigate the relationship between the degree of interdisciplinarity and the local orientation of the articles. We find that a higher degree of interdisciplinarity in a publication is associated with a greater emphasis on local issues. In particular, our results support the view that research that combines cognitively disparate disciplines, what we refer to as distal interdisciplinarity, is associated with more local focus of research. We discuss the policy implications of these results in the context of national research assessments targeting excellence and socio-economic impact.

[1]  Vladimir Vladimirovich Nabokov,et al.  Signs and symbols , 1948 .

[2]  A. House,et al.  ‘Impact’ in the proposals for the UK's Research Excellence Framework: Shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy , 2011 .

[3]  W. Heath.  The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies , 2008 .

[4]  James Wilsdon.  Knowledge, networks and nations: global scientific collaboration in the 21st century , 2011 .

[5]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.

[6]  R. Clemmons,et al.  The Role of Search in University Productivity: Inside, Outside, and Interdisciplinary Dimensions , 2009 .

[7]  Hernán Thomas,et al.  El pensamiento en ciencia, tecnología y sociedad en Latinoamérica : una interpretación política de su trayectoria , 1996 .

[8]  Jeremy Phillipson,et al.  Reflexive Interdisciplinary Research: The Making of a Research Programme on the Rural Economy and Land Use , 2006 .

[9]  Ann Kern,et al.  DYING FOR CHANGE Poor people ’ s , 2002 .

[10]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  Conducting pro-social research: cognitive diversity, research excellence and awareness about the social impact of research , 2012 .

[11]  Frederick A. Rossini,et al.  International research management : studies in interdisciplinary methods from business, government, and academia , 1990 .

[12]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[13]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[14]  S. Brint.  Creating the Future: ‘New Directions’ in American Research Universities , 2005 .

[15]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS: and sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll, 3rd Edition , 2009 .

[17]  Diane Stone,et al.  Banking on knowledge : the genesis of the Global Development Network , 2002 .

[18]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  Peer review and the relevance gap: Ten suggestions for policy-makers , 2007 .

[19]  Antonio Gutiérrez-Gracia,et al.  The Regional Dimension of Innovation and the Globalization of Science: The Case of Biotechnology in a Peripheral Region of the European Union , 2007 .

[20]  I. Ràfols,et al.  Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  George Kampis,et al.  Towards a typology of research performance diversity: the case of top Hungarian players , 2011, Scientometrics.

[23]  J. Klein,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. , 1991 .

[24]  S. Berrol.  Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice , 1992 .

[25]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. , 2007, Health services research.

[26]  Luis Antonio.  Efficiency measurement of research groups using Data Envelopment Analysis and Bayesian networks , 2010 .

[27]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[28]  Georgina Born,et al.  Logics of interdisciplinarity , 2008 .

[29]  Paul A. Herzberg,et al.  Principles of Statistics , 1983 .

[30]  C. Tilley,et al.  A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments , 1994 .

[31]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Doing Research that is Useful to Practice a Model and Empirical Exploration , 2001 .

[32]  Grit Laudel,et al.  Conclave in the Tower of Babel: how peers review interdisciplinary research proposals , 2006 .

[33]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinarity. The case of innovation studies in business and management , 2011, ArXiv.

[34]  Andrew Kliskey,et al.  Assessing the Impacts of Local Knowledge and Technology on Climate Change Vulnerability in Remote Communities , 2011, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[35]  L. Fleming,et al.  Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success , 2007 .

[36]  Guillermo Andrés Lemarchand,et al.  The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks: Iberoamerican countries (1973–2010) , 2012 .

[37]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity , 2007, Scientometrics.

[38]  A. Stirling.  A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[39]  Hernán Thomas.  Los estudios sociales de la tecnología en América Latina , 2013 .

[40]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations , 2007 .

[42]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[43]  F. J. Rijnsoever,et al.  Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration , 2011 .

[44]  D. Rhoten,et al.  Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path , 2004, Science.

[45]  S. F. Alatas,et al.  On the Indigenization of Academic Discourse , 1993 .

[46]  Guillermo A. Lemarchand,et al.  The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks, Iberoamerican Countries (1973-2006) , 2010, ArXiv.

[47]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  Intrinsic and Prosocial Motivations, Perspective Taking, and Creativity , 2011, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[48]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[49]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration , 2007 .

[50]  Andy Neely,et al.  Inventors and Entrepreneurs in Academia: What Types of Skills and Experience Matter? , 2011 .

[51]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Stud , 2012 .

[52]  Paul Burger,et al.  Disentangling Transdisciplinarity: An Analysis of Knowledge Integration in Problem-Oriented Research , 2007 .

[53]  Judith Sutz,et al.  Inequality and University Research Agendas in Latin America , 2003 .

[54]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  New activities of universities in transfer and extension: multiple requirements and manifold solutions , 2009 .

[55]  Gloria Origgi,et al.  Introduction to a special issue on the assessment of interdisciplinary research , 2006 .

[56]  Pablo Kreimer.  Social Studies of Science and Technology in Latin America: A Field in the Process of Consolidation , 2007 .

[57]  A. Caelleigh,et al.  SIGNS AND SYMBOLS , 2001 .

[58]  R MaríaIsabelRestrepo,et al.  Clasificación de grupos de investigación colombianos aplicando análisis envolvente de datos , 2007 .

[59]  T. D. N. Thi,et al.  Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research , 2005 .

[60]  Arie Rip,et al.  Evaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands , 2000 .

[61]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  The Research Excellence Framework and the ‘impact agenda’: are we creating a Frankenstein monster? , 2011 .

[62]  G. Ordonez-Matamoros,et al.  International co-authorship and research team performance in Colombia , 2009, 2009 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy.

[63]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[64]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: A Critical Assessment , 2009 .

[65]  Gonzalo Ordóñez-Matamoros,et al.  International research collaboration, research team performance, and scientific and; technological capabilities in colombia -a bottom-up perspective , 2008 .

[66]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[67]  Xavier Polanco,et al.  Efficiency measurement of research groups using Data Envelopment Analysis and Bayesian networks , 2010, Scientometrics.

[68]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda , 2008 .