Atmospheric extinction in solar tower plants: absorption and broadband correction for MOR measurements

Abstract. Losses of reflected Direct Normal Irradiance due to atmospheric extinction in concentrated solar tower plants can vary significantly with site and time. The losses of the direct normal irradiance between the heliostat field and receiver in a solar tower plant are mainly caused by atmospheric scattering and absorption by aerosol and water vapor concentration in the atmospheric boundary layer. Due to a high aerosol particle number, radiation losses can be significantly larger in desert environments compared to the standard atmospheric conditions which are usually considered in ray-tracing or plant optimization tools. Information about on-site atmospheric extinction is only rarely available. To measure these radiation losses, two different commercially available instruments were tested, and more than 19 months of measurements were collected and compared at the Plataforma Solar de Almeria. Both instruments are primarily used to determine the meteorological optical range (MOR). The Vaisala FS11 scatterometer is based on a monochromatic near-infrared light source emission and measures the strength of scattering processes in a small air volume mainly caused by aerosol particles. The Optec LPV4 long-path visibility transmissometer determines the monochromatic attenuation between a light-emitting diode (LED) light source at 532 nm and a receiver and therefore also accounts for absorption processes. As the broadband solar attenuation is of interest for solar resource assessment for concentrated solar power (CSP), a correction procedure for these two instruments is developed and tested. This procedure includes a spectral correction of both instruments from monochromatic to broadband attenuation. That means the attenuation is corrected for the time-dependent solar spectrum which is reflected by the collector. Further, an absorption correction for the Vaisala FS11 scatterometer is implemented. To optimize the absorption and broadband correction (ABC) procedure, additional measurement input of a nearby sun photometer is used to enhance on-site atmospheric assumptions for description of the atmosphere in the algorithm. Comparing both uncorrected and spectral- and absorption-corrected extinction data from 1-year measurements at the Plataforma Solar de Almeria, the mean difference between the scatterometer and the transmissometer is reduced from 4.4 to 0.57 %. Applying the ABC procedure without the usage of additional input data from a sun photometer still reduces the difference between both sensors to about 0.8 %. Applying an expert guess assuming a standard aerosol profile for continental regions instead of additional sun photometer input results in a mean difference of 0.8 %. Additionally, a simulation approach which just uses sun photometer and common meteorological data to determine the on-site atmospheric extinction at surface is presented and corrected FS11 and LPV4 measurements are validated with the simulation results. For T1 km equal to 0.9 and a 10 min time resolution, an uncertainty analysis showed that an absolute uncertainty of about 0.038 is expected for the FS11 and about 0.057 for the LPV4. Combining both uncertainties results in an overall absolute uncertainty of 0.068 which justifies quite well the mean RMSE between both corrected data sets. For yearly averages several error influences average out and absolute uncertainties of 0.020 and 0.054 can be expected for the FS11 and the LPV4, respectively. Therefore, applying this new correction method, both instruments can now be utilized to sufficiently accurately determine the solar broadband extinction in tower plants.

[1]  Eckhard Lüpfert,et al.  OPTICAL CHARACTERISATION OF REFLECTOR MATERIALFOR CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER TECHNOLOGY , 2009 .

[2]  Jesús Ballestrín,et al.  Solar radiation attenuation in solar tower plants , 2012 .

[3]  C. Gertig,et al.  SoFiA – A Novel Simulation Tool for Central Receiver Systems , 2014 .

[4]  Natalie Hanrieder Atmospheric Extinction in Solar Tower Plants , 2014 .

[5]  C. Gueymard Parameterized transmittance model for direct beam and circumsolar spectral irradiance , 2001 .

[6]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Visual HFLCAL - A Software Tool for Layout and Optimisation of Heliostat Fields , 2009 .

[7]  Claudia Emde,et al.  New secondary-scattering correction in DISORT with increased efficiency for forward scattering , 2011 .

[8]  Bernhard Mayer,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Technical Note: the Libradtran Software Package for Radiative Transfer Calculations – Description and Examples of Use , 2022 .

[9]  G. d’Almeida,et al.  Number, Mass and Volume Distributions of Mineral Aerosol and Soils of the Sahara , 1983 .

[10]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Evaluation of AERONET precipitable water vapor versus microwave radiometry, GPS, and radiosondes at ARM sites , 2014 .

[11]  Catherine Gautier,et al.  SBDART: A Research and Teaching Software Tool for Plane-Parallel Radiative Transfer in the Earth's Atmosphere. , 1998 .

[12]  R. Washington,et al.  Dust-Storm Source Areas Determined by the Total Ozone Monitoring Spectrometer and Surface Observations , 2003 .

[13]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  A New Fast Ray Tracing Tool for High-Precision Simulation of Heliostat Fields , 2009 .

[14]  F. X. Kneizys,et al.  AFGL atmospheric constituent profiles (0-120km) , 1986 .

[15]  K. Stamnes,et al.  Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. , 1988, Applied optics.

[16]  Knut Stamnes,et al.  General Purpose Fortran Program for Discrete-Ordinate-Method Radiative Transfer in Scattering and Emitting Layered Media: An Update of DISORT , 2000 .

[17]  R. Engelmann,et al.  The Spectral Aerosol Extinction Monitoring System (SǼMS): setup, observational products, and comparisons , 2013 .

[18]  Bernhard Mayer,et al.  The impact of aerosols on polarized sky radiance: model development, validation, and applications , 2009 .

[19]  C. Gueymard Visibility, aerosol conditions, and irradiance attenuation close to the ground—Comments on “Solar radiation attenuation in solar tower plants” by J. Ballestrin and A. Marzo, Solar Energy (2012) , 2012 .

[20]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Determination of beam attenuation in tower plants , 2012 .

[21]  P. Koepke,et al.  Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC , 1998 .

[22]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[23]  E. Shettle Models of aerosols, clouds, and precipitation for atmospheric propagation studies , 1990 .

[24]  M. Sengupta,et al.  Atmospheric Attenuation in Central Receiver Systems from DNI Measurements , 2012 .

[25]  B L Kistler,et al.  A user's manual for DELSOL3: A computer code for calculating the optical performance and optimal system design for solar thermal central receiver plants , 1986 .

[26]  Josef Gasteiger,et al.  Representative wavelengths absorption parameterization applied to satellite channels and spectral bands , 2014 .

[27]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Modeling beam attenuation in solar tower plants using common DNI measurements , 2016 .

[28]  Manajit Sengupta,et al.  Estimating Atmospheric Attenuation in Central Receiver Systems , 2012 .

[29]  C. Gueymard Direct solar transmittance and irradiance predictions with broadband models. Part I: detailed theoretical performance assessment , 2003 .

[30]  L. L. Vant-Hull,et al.  Atmospheric transmittance model for a solar beam propagating between a heliostat and a receiver , 1984 .

[31]  Arve Kylling,et al.  libRadtran user's guide , 2010 .

[32]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Cloud-Screening and Quality Control Algorithms for the AERONET Database , 2000 .