BENCHMARKING AND REGULATION OF ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION UTILITIES: LESSONS FROM INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

Since the early 1980’s, many countries have implemented electricity sector reform, many of which have bundled generation, transmission, distribution and supply activities, and have introduced competition in generation and supply. An increasing number of countries are also adopting incentive regulation to promote efficiency improvement in the natural monopoly activities - transmission and distribution. Incentive regulation almost invariably involves benchmarking or comparison of actual vs. some reference performance. This paper reviews the main approaches to incentive regulation and discusses various benchmarking methods. We also present the finding of a survey of the use of benchmarking methods in the OECD and few other countries. Our survey finds a variety of methods used by the electricity regulators although with a notable preference for the non-parametric methods. We then draw conclusions based on the finding of the survey highlighting the main outstanding issues and lessons for best practice implementation of benchmarking in electricity regulation.

[1]  Jinook Jeong,et al.  An evaluation of incentive regulation for electric utilities , 1991 .

[2]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  Ownership and Performance in Electric Utilities , 1998 .

[3]  Ned Greene,et al.  Performance Based Ratemaking for Electric Utilities: Review of Plans and Analysis of Economic and Re , 1995 .

[4]  R. Bartels,et al.  The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA with an Application to Electricity Distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand , 1998 .

[5]  Edythe S. Miller.  Privatization, Restructuring, and Regulation of Network Utilities , 2001 .

[6]  Akira Takayama,et al.  Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint , 1969 .

[7]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Are Municipal Electricity Distribution Utilities Natural Monopolies , 1998 .

[8]  Jerome L. Stein,et al.  Behavior of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint , 1972 .

[9]  Best practice utility regulation , 1999 .

[10]  Stanley R. Stansell,et al.  The effects of ownership form on profit maximization and cost minimization behavior within municipal and cooperative electrical distribution utilities , 1995 .

[11]  ON THE TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY UNDER REGULATION: A CASE FOR THE JAPANESE ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY , 1990 .

[12]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  Incentive Regulation For Electric Utilities , 1986 .

[13]  J. Vickers,et al.  RPI-X Price Cap Regulation , 1991 .

[14]  Electricity market reform in Norway , 2000 .

[15]  P. Miliotis,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Applied to Electricity Distribution Districts , 1992 .

[16]  P. T. Spiller,et al.  The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Commitment: A Comparative Analysis of Telecommunications Regulation , 1994 .

[17]  J. Yunos,et al.  The efficiency of the National Electricity Board in Malaysia: an intercountry comparison using DEA , 1997 .

[18]  Shelton S. Schmidt,et al.  Productivity changes in the U.S. electric power industry , 1992 .

[19]  Catherine Waddams Price,et al.  Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: A non-parametric model of the Turkish experience , 1996 .

[20]  S. Littlechild.  Privatization, competition and regulation in the British electricity industry, with implications for developing countries , 2000 .

[21]  Simon Cowan,et al.  Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience , 1994 .

[22]  J. Blundell.  Regulation Without the State , 1999 .

[23]  R. Vedavalli,et al.  The world banks' role in the electric power sector , 1993, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[24]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Theory of Yardstick Competition , 1985 .

[25]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Productivity development of Norwegian electricity distribution utilities , 1998 .

[26]  M. A. Crew,et al.  Incentive regulation in the United Kingdom and the United States: Some lessons , 1996 .

[27]  Thomas G. Weyman-Jones,et al.  Productive efficiency in a regulated industry: The area electricity boards of England and Wales , 1991 .

[28]  Rafael Charun.  (De)regulation and competition : the electric industry in Chile , 1997 .

[29]  M. Berry.  Private ownership form and productive efficiency: Electric cooperatives versus investor-owned utilities , 1994 .

[30]  P. Joskow.  Electricity Sectors in Transition , 1998 .

[31]  John Vickers,et al.  Privatization: An Economic Analysis , 1988 .

[32]  Economies of Scale in the New Zealand Electricity Distribution Industry , 1989 .

[33]  Mika Goto,et al.  Comparison of Productive and Cost Efficiencies Among Japanese and US Electric Utilities , 1998 .

[34]  Lars Bergman,et al.  A European market for electricity , 1999 .

[35]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  Relative performance of public and private ownership under yardstick competition: electricity retail distribution , 1998 .

[36]  John W. Sawkins.  Yardstick competition in the English and Welsh water industry Fiction or reality , 1995 .

[37]  P. Koele.  MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING: AN INTRODUCTION, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-104, K. Paul Yoon and Ching-Lai Hwang, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995, 73 pp., ISBN 0-8039-5486-7. , 1997 .

[38]  Hugh Rudnick,et al.  Integration of price cap and yardstick competition schemes in electrical distribution regulation , 2000 .

[39]  Predrag P. Jovanović.  Regulation of British telecommunications , 1992 .

[40]  R. Schmalensee.  The control of natural monopolies , 1979 .

[41]  L. J. Hill,et al.  A primer on incentive regulation for electric utilities , 1995 .

[42]  Shawna Grosskopf,et al.  The Measurement of Efficiency of , 1985 .

[43]  Suthathip Yaisawarng,et al.  The Effects of Sulfur Dioxide Controls on Productivity Change in the U.S. Electric Power Industry , 1994 .

[44]  John Houghton,et al.  International Comparisons of Australia's Infrastructure Performance , 1997 .

[45]  A. E. Meibodi.  Efficiency Considerations in the Electricity Supply Industry; The Case of Iran , 1998 .

[46]  E. Claggett.  A cost function study of the providers of TVA power , 1994 .

[47]  J. Stern,et al.  Regulatory governance: criteria for assessing the performance of regulatory systems: An application to infrastructure industries in the developing countries of Asia , 1999 .

[48]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[49]  J. Whiteman.  The Potential Benefits of Hilmer and Related Reforms: Electricity Supply , 1999 .

[50]  G. Priest.  The Origins of Utility Regulation and the "Theories of Regulation" Debate , 1993, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[51]  Thomas G. Weyman-Jones,et al.  COST FUNCTIONS AND COST EFFICIENCY IN ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION: A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER APPROACH , 1996 .