Categorical processing of fast temporal sequences in the guinea pig auditory brainstem

Discrimination of temporal sequences is crucial for auditory object recognition, phoneme categorization and speech understanding. The present study shows that auditory brainstem responses (ABR) to pairs of noise bursts separated by a short gap can be classified into two distinct groups based on the ratio of gap duration to initial noise burst duration in guinea pigs. If this ratio was smaller than 0.5, the ABR to the trailing noise burst was strongly suppressed. On the other hand, if the initial noise burst duration was short compared to the gap duration (a ratio greater than 0.5), a release from suppression and/or enhancement of the trailing ABR was observed. Consequently, initial noise bursts of shorter duration caused a faster transition between response classes than initial noise bursts of longer duration. We propose that the described findings represent a neural correlate of subcortical categorical preprocessing of temporal sequences in the auditory system.Alice Burghard et al. record auditory brainstem responses from guinea pigs during the presentation of paired noise bursts separated by a short gap. The responses obtained can be categorized into two groups based on the leading noise burst and the following gap duration, suggesting that categorical processing of temporal sequences can occur already in the brainstem.

[1]  N. Kiang,et al.  Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat III: identified cell populations , 1996, Hearing Research.

[2]  William J. Williams,et al.  Improved time-frequency representation of multicomponent signals using exponential kernels , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[3]  Michael W. Weiss,et al.  Listening to the Brainstem: Musicianship Enhances Intelligibility of Subcortical Representations for Speech , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  I. Nelken,et al.  Processing of complex sounds in the auditory system , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  N. Kiang,et al.  Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat. I. An experimental approach to their identification , 1996, Hearing Research.

[6]  Andrej Kral,et al.  Developmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantation , 2012, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  J. Eggermont Between sound and perception: reviewing the search for a neural code , 2001, Hearing Research.

[8]  Claude Alain,et al.  Age-related changes in the subcortical–cortical encoding and categorical perception of speech , 2014, Neurobiology of Aging.

[9]  Kirill V. Nourski,et al.  Auditory Predictive Coding across Awareness States under Anesthesia: An Intracranial Electrophysiology Study , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  M. Kilgard,et al.  Different timescales for the neural coding of consonant and vowel sounds. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  J D Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: identification function for synthetic VOT stimuli. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  V V Popov,et al.  Temporal resolution in the dolphin's auditory system revealed by double-click evoked potential study. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Y. Cohen,et al.  The what, where and how of auditory-object perception , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  N. Kraus,et al.  Reading and subcortical auditory function. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  W. Catterall,et al.  Calcium Channel Regulation and Presynaptic Plasticity , 2008, Neuron.

[17]  Charles T. Snowdon,et al.  An investigation of categorical speech discrimination by rhesus monkeys , 1975 .

[18]  S. Peters,et al.  Neural Correlates of Categorical Perception in Learned Vocal Communication , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Neural and behavioral correlates of auditory categorization , 2007, Hearing Research.

[20]  A. Lotto,et al.  Speech perception as categorization , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Gavin M. Bidelman,et al.  Songbirds tradeoff auditory frequency resolution and temporal resolution , 2011, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[22]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[23]  N. Kraus,et al.  Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  P. Dallos,et al.  Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[26]  Nicole M. Russo,et al.  Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  N. Kraus,et al.  Context-Dependent Encoding in the Human Auditory Brainstem Relates to Hearing Speech in Noise: Implications for Developmental Dyslexia , 2009, Neuron.

[28]  Bryan M. Krause,et al.  Preferential effect of isoflurane on top-down vs. bottom-up pathways in sensory cortex , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[29]  R. Patterson,et al.  Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Categorical perception. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[31]  J. Linden,et al.  Mind the Gap: Two Dissociable Mechanisms of Temporal Processing in the Auditory System , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  A. Oxenham How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound , 2018, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  M. Dorman,et al.  Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  H. C. Stronks,et al.  Effects of isoflurane on auditory evoked potentials in the cochlea and brainstem of guinea pigs , 2010, Hearing Research.

[35]  N. Kraus,et al.  Beyond Words: How Humans Communicate Through Sound. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  T. Griffiths,et al.  What is an auditory object? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  R. Blair,et al.  An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[38]  Mitchell Steinschneider,et al.  Intracortical responses in human and monkey primary auditory cortex support a temporal processing mechanism for encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Claude Alain,et al.  Tracing the emergence of categorical speech perception in the human auditory system , 2013, NeuroImage.

[40]  David M. W. Powers,et al.  Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation , 2011, ArXiv.

[41]  A. Liberman,et al.  On the relation of speech to language , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Neural correlates of categories and concepts , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  A. Lotto,et al.  Speech Perception: The View from the Auditory System , 2016 .

[44]  R. Levine,et al.  Comparison of cat and human brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[45]  Gavin M. Bidelman,et al.  Spectrotemporal resolution tradeoff in auditory processing as revealed by human auditory brainstem responses and psychophysical indices , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.

[46]  Robert D Frisina,et al.  Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms , 1997, Hearing Research.

[47]  Kirill V. Nourski,et al.  Representation of speech in human auditory cortex: Is it special? , 2013, Hearing Research.