RESEARCH ARTICLES The Relevance of Prior Knowledge in Learning and Instructional Design

Objectives. To determine how different types of prior knowledge (declarative and procedural) impact student achievement and how prior-knowledge assessment can be used as an instructional design tool. Methods. A questionnaire was developed based on the prior-knowledge model, which distinguishes between declarative and procedural knowledge. One hundred fifteen pharmacy students were tested prior to beginning 4 successive basic science courses and then prior to beginning a pharmaceutical chemistry course. Regression analysis was used to determine which type of knowledge was the best predictor of student achievement. The 4 course instructors were interviewed and their comments analyzed. Results. Prior knowledge from previous courses significantly influenced student achievement. Procedural knowledge was especially related to student achievement. Instructors and students had mainly positive reactions towards the prior-knowledge tests. Conclusions. Students’ prior knowledge should be taken into consideration in instructional design and curriculum planning. Furthermore, the results of prior-knowledge assessments may be used as a tool for student support in addressing areas of deficiency.

[1]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[2]  J. Donald Learning to Think: Disciplinary Perspectives , 2002 .

[3]  S. Portier,et al.  The Assessment of Prior Knowledge Profiles: A Support for Independent Learning? , 1995 .

[4]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Reflection: issues related to improving professors' teaching and students' learning , 2000 .

[5]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  New Insights Into Learning and Teaching and Their Implications for Assessment , 2003 .

[6]  D. Paulhus,et al.  The Challenge to Cumulative Learning: Do Introductory Courses Actually Benefit Advanced Students? , 2004 .

[7]  Filip Dochy,et al.  Assessment and feedback as student support devices , 1997 .

[8]  Ross A. Thompson,et al.  Prior Knowledge and Its Relevance to Student Achievement in Introduction to Psychology , 2003 .

[9]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes, and Prior Knowledge , 1996 .

[10]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[11]  P. Lyne,et al.  Written drug dosage errors made by students: the threat to clinical effectiveness and the need for a new approach , 2000 .

[12]  S. Lindblom-Ylänne,et al.  EXPLORING ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF ASSESSING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE, ITS COMPONENTS AND THEIR RELATION TO STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: A MATHEMATICS BASED CASE STUDY , 2007 .

[13]  K. Heller,et al.  Gender differences in science education: The double‐edged role of prior knowledge in physics , 1998 .

[14]  S. Tobias Interest, Prior Knowledge, and Learning , 1994 .

[15]  H. Batchelor The Importance of a Mathematics Diagnostic Test for Incoming Pharmacy Undergraduates , 2004 .

[16]  R. Martens Internet based formative prior knowledge assessment , 1999 .

[17]  Filip Dochy,et al.  Cognitive Prerequisites and Learning , 2002 .

[18]  U. Flick An Introduction to Qualitative Research , 1998 .

[19]  Dan Bowman,et al.  The differential effects of prior knowledge on learning: A study of two consecutive courses in earth sciences , 2001 .

[20]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  Toward adaptive assessment — The student's angle , 1994 .

[21]  F. Dochy,et al.  Assessment as a tool for learning , 1997 .

[22]  S. Sharif,et al.  Diagnostic testing of first year pharmacy students: A tool for targeted student support , 2007 .

[23]  Stewart E. Glaspole,et al.  Formative assessment as a learning aid for pharmacy calculations— a theory based design , 2006 .

[24]  Mien Segers,et al.  Optimising new modes of assessment : in search of qualities and standards , 2003 .

[25]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[26]  M. Segers,et al.  The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge , 1999 .