Thermodynamic boundaries of energy saving in conventional CCHP (Combined Cooling, Heating and Power) systems

In this research, an improved calculational method of ESR (energy saving rate) considering energy adjustments caused by climate effects is presented based on international standards or regulations regarding energy management. The indicator of “general heat-to-electricity ratio” (R) is proposed to illustrate the energy configurations of CCHP (Combined Cooling, Heating and Power) systems and their potential users. Theoretical calculations of “thermodynamic boundaries” incorporating the general heat-to-electricity ratio as well as the maximum of ESR have been discussed in the mode of “priority of providing cooling” to find the most suitable users for CCHP systems and to envision the energy saving potentials of CCHP systems. Moreover, investigation of CCHP systems in China in terms of ESR distribution has been undertaken to corroborate the theoretical calculations. Theoretical results show that the most suitable CCHP users should have their general heat-to-electricity ratios valued in the range of 0.9–2.8 (without heating demand) or 0.65–1.3 (with heating demand). Furthermore, particularly in Beijing, the maximums of ESR of CCHP systems without and with heating demand cases are 32.5% and 38%, respectively. Deviations between the investigation and theoretical calculations can be partially attributed to the assumptions, which have also been discussed.

[1]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Reliability and availability analysis of redundant BCHP (building cooling, heating and power) system , 2013 .

[2]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Energy utilization evaluation of CCHP systems , 2006 .

[3]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Energetic and exergetic performance analyses of a combined heat and power plant with absorption inlet cooling and evaporative aftercooling , 2011 .

[4]  Sepehr Sanaye,et al.  Simultaneous use of MRM (maximum rectangle method) and optimization methods in determining nominal capacity of gas engines in CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power) systems , 2014 .

[5]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) optimization of solar-assisted hybrid CCHP system , 2015 .

[6]  Harvey S. Leff,et al.  Thermal efficiency at maximum work output: New results for old heat engines , 1987 .

[7]  Hongguang Jin,et al.  The exergy and energy level analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power system driven by a small scale gas turbine at off design condition , 2014 .

[8]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[9]  Xi Zhuo Jiang,et al.  Carbon footprint analysis of a combined cooling heating and power system , 2015 .

[10]  Andreas Poullikkas,et al.  An overview of current and future sustainable gas turbine technologies , 2005 .

[11]  Minlin Yang,et al.  Research, development and the prospect of combined cooling, heating, and power systems , 2010 .

[12]  Nelson Fumo,et al.  Analysis of combined cooling, heating, and power systems operating following the electric load and following the thermal load strategies with no electricity export , 2011 .

[13]  Arif Hepbasli,et al.  Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyses of a trigeneration (TRIGEN) system with a gas–diesel engine: Part II – An application , 2010 .

[14]  Miao Li,et al.  Optimal option of natural-gas district distributed energy systems for various buildings , 2014 .

[15]  Ali Keshavarz,et al.  Sizing the prime mover of a residential micro-combined cooling heating and power (CCHP) system by multi-criteria sizing method for different climates , 2013 .

[16]  Yanjun Dai,et al.  Energy matching and optimization analysis of waste to energy CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power) system with exergy and energy level , 2015 .

[17]  Ruzhu Wang,et al.  Numerical investigation of a two-stage air-cooled absorption refrigeration system for solar cooling: Cycle analysis and absorption cooling performances , 2011 .

[18]  Firdaus Basrawi,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Micro Gas Turbine Cogeneration System at Sewage Treatment Plant : Performance Analysis under Various Regions with Different Annual Average Temperature(Thermal Engineering) , 2010 .

[19]  Sheng Li,et al.  Multi-objective optimal operation strategy study of micro-CCHP system , 2012, Energy.

[20]  Andrea Luigi Facci,et al.  Optimization of CHCP (combined heat power and cooling) systems operation strategy using dynamic programming , 2014 .

[21]  Patrick E. Phelan,et al.  Economic feasibility of combined heat and power and absorption refrigeration with commercially available gas turbines , 2001 .

[22]  Francesco Calise,et al.  Thermoeconomic analysis of storage systems for solar heating and cooling systems: A comparison between variable-volume and fixed-volume tanks , 2013 .

[23]  Fahad A. Al-Sulaiman,et al.  Performance assessment of a novel system using parabolic trough solar collectors for combined cooling, heating, and power production , 2012 .

[24]  Ruzhu Wang,et al.  COMBINED COOLING, HEATING AND POWER: A REVIEW , 2006 .

[25]  Qingsong An,et al.  Influence of working fluid properties on system performance and screen evaluation indicators for geothermal ORC (organic Rankine cycle) system , 2014 .

[26]  Arif Hepbasli,et al.  Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyses of a trigeneration (TRIGEN) system with a gas–diesel engine: Part I – Methodology , 2010 .

[28]  Firdaus Basrawi,et al.  Effect of ambient temperature on the performance of micro gas turbine with cogeneration system in cold region , 2011 .

[29]  C. Y. Zheng,et al.  A novel operation strategy for CCHP systems based on minimum distance , 2014 .

[30]  Alberto Coronas,et al.  Performance analysis of combined microgas turbines and gas fired water/LiBr absorption chillers with post-combustion , 2005 .

[31]  Ali Keshavarz,et al.  Climate impact on the prime mover size and design of a CCHP system for the residential building , 2012 .