Inferring a Learner's Cognitive, Motivational and Emotional State in a Digital Educational Game.

Digital educational games (DEGs) possess the potential of providing an appealing and intrinsically motivating learning context. Usually this potential is either taken for granted or examined through questionnaires or interviews in the course of evaluation studies. However, an adaptive game would increase the probability of a DEG being actually motivating and emotionally appealing. In order to adapt the game to the learner s motivational and emotional state while engaged with a particular game scenario, an ongoing assessment of these states is required. An explicit assessment, e.g. by questionnaires occurring repeatedly in short time intervals on the screen would probably destroy the learner s flow experience. Thus, it is necessary to apply an approach that assesses the learner s current states in a non-invasive way. In the course of this paper we describe such a noninvasive, implicit assessment procedure which is based on the interpretation of behavioral indicators. A set of behavioral indicators has been elaborated whereby some of them are derived from the theory of information foraging (Pirolli and Card, 1999). Values for each behavioral indicator (e.g. amount, frequency, seconds, etc.) are gathered after equally long lasting time slices. After each time slice, these values serve as weighted predictors to multiple regression equations for the dimensions of a motivation model, an emotion model and a construct called clearness. The motivation model is based on the two dimensions of approach and avoidance motivation. The emotion model encompasses the dimensions valence and activation. Clearness is defined as appropriate problem representation. A comparison of the resulting values on these dimensions between the current and previous time slices covers fluctuations of the learner`s states over time. The assessment of such changes forms the prerequisite for providing in-game adaptations which aim to enhance the learner`s state, targeting towards a full exploitation of DEGs’ pedagogical potential.

[1]  Simone Kopeinik,et al.  Evaluation of Collaborative Learning Settings in 3D Virtual Worlds , 2009, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[2]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[3]  G. Riva,et al.  Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurements of User Presence in Synthetic Environments , 2003 .

[4]  K. Scherer,et al.  Psychophysiological responses to appraisal dimensions in a computer game , 2004 .

[5]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Recognizing, defining, and representing problems. , 2003 .

[6]  P. Ruohotie Motivation and Self-regulated Learning , 1994 .

[7]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Handbook of communication and social interaction skills , 2003 .

[8]  H. E. King The Achievement Motive , 1977 .

[9]  W. Revelle,et al.  The implications of arousal effects for the study of affect and memory. , 1992 .

[10]  John R. Anderson The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[11]  P. Lang Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications , 1980 .

[12]  Hua Cai,et al.  Modeling of operators' emotion and task performance in a virtual driving environment , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[14]  R. Larsen,et al.  Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. , 1992 .

[15]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Micro-adaptivity: protecting immersion in didactically adaptive digital educational games , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[16]  Christian Peter,et al.  Emotion representation and physiology assignments in digital systems , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[17]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Non-invasive data tracking in educational games: Combination of logfiles and natural language processing , 2010 .

[18]  Jonas W. B. Lang,et al.  A Revised 10-Item Version of The Achievement Motives Scale: Psychometric Properties in German-Speaking Samples , 2006 .

[19]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Development of Problem Solving , 1994 .

[20]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Suboptimal tradeoffs in information seeking , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Joachim Funke,et al.  Thinking and problem solving , 2002 .

[22]  A. Elliot,et al.  Handbook of Competence and Motivation , 2013 .

[23]  J. Bargh,et al.  The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[25]  Bruce D. Burns,et al.  4 Motivation and self-regulated learning , 2000 .

[26]  J. W. Atkinson Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. , 1957, Psychological review.

[27]  P. Lang The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. , 1995, The American psychologist.

[28]  G. Bower How might emotions affect learning , 1992 .

[29]  A. Elliot,et al.  Approach and Avoidance Motivation , 2001 .

[30]  K. Engle Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education , 1981 .

[31]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Information Foraging , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.