Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives.

OBJECTIVES The magnitude and kinetics of polymerization shrinkage, together with elastic modulus, may be potential predictors of bond failure of adhesive restorations. This study examined these properties in visible-light-cured resins, in particular new flowable composites and filled adhesives. METHODS Polymerization shrinkage values were obtained by digital video imaging before and after light-curing; shrinkage kinetics were obtained by the "deflecting disk" method and the elastic modulus by analysis of the fundamental period of vibration. RESULTS Flowable composites generally showed higher shrinkage than traditional non-flowable composites, while more densely filled adhesives presented lower shrinkage than lightly filled or unfilled resins. The elastic moduli of flowable composites were in the low-medium range, whilst the hybrid composites showed the highest values and the microfilled the lowest. More densely filled adhesives were more rigid than lightly filled and unfilled adhesives. The kinetics behavior was material dependent, mainly characterized by the coefficient of near-linear contraction between 10 and 40% of the final shrinkage and the time to reach 75% of the final shrinkage. SIGNIFICANCE The higher shrinkage of flowable composites over that of hybrids may indicate a potential for higher interfacial stresses. However, their lower rigidity may be a counteracting factor. The microfilled composite showed low shrinkage and low rigidity, a combination that may prove less damaging to the interface. As the kinetics parameters tended to be material specific, no specific class of materials should be seen as more stress inducing until studies determine the relative importance of each examined parameter. The performance of adhesive resins as stress buffers also remains unpredictable.

[1]  C. Davidson,et al.  Relaxation of Polymerization Contraction Stresses by Flow in Dental Composites , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[2]  G Willems,et al.  A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  G. Willems,et al.  Assessment by Nano-indentation of the Hardness and Elasticity of the Resin-Dentin Bonding Area , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[4]  C. Davidson,et al.  Marginal Sealing of Curing Contraction Gaps in Class V Composite Resin Restorations , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[5]  D. Pashley,et al.  Hybridization of Dental Hard Tissues , 1998 .

[6]  C. Davidson,et al.  The Competition between the Composite-Dentin Bond Strength and the Polymerization Contraction Stress , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[7]  Robert W. Cahn,et al.  Materials science and technology : a comprehensive treatment , 2000 .

[8]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  The Impact of Composite Structure on Its Elastic Response , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[9]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  The Relationship Between Test Methodology and Elastic Behavior of Composites , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[10]  C. Davidson,et al.  Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. , 1995, European journal of oral sciences.

[11]  F. Barbakow,et al.  Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  C. Davidson,et al.  Complete Marginal Seal of Class V Resin Composite Restorations Effected by Increased Flexibility , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[13]  A. Feilzer,et al.  Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  R. Hickel,et al.  Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[15]  D. Watts Elastic moduli and visco-elastic relaxation. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[16]  C. Davidson,et al.  Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  C. Davidson,et al.  Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. , 1997, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  R. Bowen,et al.  Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: forces developing in composite materials during hardening. , 1983, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[19]  D C Watts,et al.  Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials: methods development. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[20]  C. Davidson,et al.  Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. , 1990, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  J. Y. Thompson,et al.  A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. , 1998, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[22]  C. Davidson,et al.  Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[23]  C. Davidson,et al.  Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  C. Davidson,et al.  Relaxation of Polymerization Contraction Shear Stress by Hygroscopic Expansion , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[25]  N. Gjerdet,et al.  Contraction stresses of composite resin filling materials. , 1977, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.