A custom-made guide for femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development and validation study

In the field of hip resurfacing arthroplasty, accurate femoral component placement is important to achieving a positive outcome and implant survival in both the short and long term. In this study, femoral component placement was defined preoperatively using virtual computed tomography-based surgical simulation of a classical posterior surgical approach. Custom-made surgical drill guides were produced to reproduce the surgical plan in the operating room. We first developed a custom-made guide for guide-wire placement to position the femoral resurfacing component. Then, to assess the accuracy in vivo, the custom-made guide was evaluated in five patients with normal anatomy. The first hypothesis of this patient study was that the use of custom-made neck guides would allow for an average accuracy within the range of ±4° for the drill path and ±4 mm for the entry point of the guide-wire. A second hypothesis was that three-dimensional preoperative planning would enable the prediction of an implant size differing by a maximum of one size from the size eventually implanted. The presented hip resurfacing guide performed well in terms of fit, stability and accuracy. The in vivo accuracy study revealed an accuracy of 4.05 ± 1.84° for the drill path and 2.73 ± 1.97 mm for the entry point of the guide-wire. The predicted component sizes and the implanted component sizes differed maximally by one size, confirming our hypothesis. We conclude that these preliminary data are promising, but require further validation in a full clinical setting in larger patient groups.

[1]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  P Gallie,et al.  The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a cadaver study. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  Klaus Radermacher,et al.  Fluoroscopic navigation system for hip surface replacement , 2007, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[4]  R Zdero,et al.  Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  J Vander Sloten,et al.  Accuracy assessment of CT-based outer surface femur meshes , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[6]  M. Swank,et al.  Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  T. Seyler,et al.  Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  Zhongmin Jin,et al.  Tribology and wear of metal-on-metal hip prostheses: influence of cup angle and head position. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Z Jianguo,et al.  Computer-assisted femoral head resurfacing , 2009, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[10]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Learning from the learning curve in total hip resurfacing: a radiographic analysis , 2009, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[11]  Michiel Mulier,et al.  A custom-made guide-wire positioning device for Hip Surface Replacement Arthroplasty: description and first results , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.