Does the Baricity of Bupivacaine Influence Intrathecal Spread in the Prolonged Sitting Position Before Elective Cesarean Delivery? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND:Difficulties in inserting an epidural catheter while performing combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery may lead to undue delays between the spinal injection of the local anesthetic mixture and the adoption of the supine position with lateral tilt. We hypothesized that this delay may affect the intrathecal distribution of local anesthetic of different baricities such that hypobaric local anesthetic would lead to a higher sensory block level. METHODS:Healthy parturients with uncomplicated pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial. The subjects were allocated to receive hyperbaric (hyperbaric group), isobaric (isobaric group), or hypobaric (hypobaric group) spinal bupivacaine 10 mg. After the spinal injection, the subjects remained in the sitting position for 5 minutes (to simulate difficulty in inserting the epidural catheter) before being helped into the supine lateral tilt position. The primary outcome was the sensory block level during the 25 minutes after the spinal injection. Other end points included motor block score, maternal hypotension, and vasopressor requirements. RESULTS:Data from 89 patients were analyzed. Patient characteristics were similar in all groups. The median [interquartile range] (95% confidence interval) sensory levels after spinal injection were significantly higher with decreasing baricity: hyperbaric T10 [T11-8] (T10-9), isobaric T9 [T10-7] (T9-7), and hypobaric T6 [T8-4] (T8-5) (P < 0.001, Cuzick trend). All patients in the hypobaric group reached a sensory block level of T4 at 25 minutes after spinal injection compared with 80% of the patients in both the isobaric and hyperbaric groups (P = 0.04; difference 20%, 95% confidence interval of difference 4%–33%). Significantly more patients in the hypobaric group had complete lower limb motor block (Bromage score = 4) (hyperbaric 43%, isobaric 63%, and hypobaric 90%; P < 0.001). The incidences of maternal hypotension and nausea and vomiting were similar among groups, although the ephedrine requirements were significantly increased in the isobaric and hypobaric groups by factors of 1.83 and 3.0, respectively, compared with the hyperbaric group (P < 0.001, Cuzick trend). CONCLUSIONS:We demonstrated that when parturients undergoing cesarean delivery were maintained in the sitting position for 5 minutes after spinal injection of the local anesthetic, hypobaric bupivacaine resulted in sensory block levels that were higher compared with isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine, respectively, during the study period.

[1]  J. Alhashemi,et al.  Effects of sitting up for five minutes versus immediately lying down after spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery on fluid and ephedrine requirement; a randomized trial , 2011, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[2]  B. Gunaydin,et al.  Intrathecal hyperbaric or isobaric bupivacaine and ropivacaine with fentanyl for elective caesarean section , 2010, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[3]  R. Röhrig,et al.  Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: identification of risk factors using an anesthesia information management system , 2009, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[4]  N. Gokmen,et al.  The influence of epidural volume extension on spinal block with hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine for Caesarean delivery. , 2008, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[5]  I. Russell Routine use of the sitting position for spinal anaesthesia should be abandoned in obstetric practice. , 2008, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[6]  M. Dresner Controversy. Routine use of the sitting position for spinal anaesthesia should be abandoned in obstetric practice. , 2008, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[7]  N. Rawal Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia , 2005, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[8]  E. Riley,et al.  The ED50 and ED95 of Intrathecal Isobaric Bupivacaine with Opioids for Cesarean Delivery , 2005, Anesthesiology.

[9]  M. Columb,et al.  The Effect of Posture and Baricity on the Spread of Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Elective Cesarean Delivery , 2005, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  E. Riley,et al.  ED50 and ED95 of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Coadministered with Opioids for Cesarean Delivery , 2004, Anesthesiology.

[11]  Y. Adachi,et al.  Influence of Lumbosacral Cerebrospinal Fluid Density, Velocity, and Volume on Extent and Duration of Plain Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia , 2004, Anesthesiology.

[12]  J. Ranasinghe,et al.  Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia is better than spinal or epidural alone for Caesarean delivery. , 2003, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  R. Fernando,et al.  Predicting the density of bupivacaine and bupivacaine-opioid combinations. , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  H. S. Helbo-Hansen,et al.  Effect of delayed supine positioning after induction of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section , 2002, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  D. Birnbach,et al.  Small-dose neuraxial block: heading toward the new millennium. , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  V. Saldien,et al.  Small-Dose Hyperbaric Versus Plain Bupivacaine During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[17]  Y. Hirabayashi,et al.  Effects of the pregnant uterus on the extradural venous plexus in the supine and lateral positions, as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, British journal of anaesthesia.

[18]  J. Abramowicz,et al.  Maternal Posture Influences the Extent of Sensory Block Produced by Intrathecal Dextrose-Free Bupivacaine with Fentanyl for Labor Analgesia , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  M. Richardson,et al.  Density of Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid in Pregnant and Nonpregnant Humans , 1996, Anesthesiology.

[20]  M. Furuse,et al.  Anatomical configuration of the spinal column in the supine position. II. Comparison of pregnant and non-pregnant women. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[21]  R. Caplan,et al.  Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. , 1992, Anesthesiology.

[22]  M. Gielen,et al.  The Influence of Temperature and Speed of Injection on the Distribution of a Solution Containing Bupivacaine and Methylene Blue in a Spinal Canal Model , 1990, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[23]  I. Russell,et al.  Subarachnoid analgesia for caesarean section. A double-blind comparison of plain and hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine. , 1987, British journal of anaesthesia.

[24]  I. Russell Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. The use of 0.5% bupivacaine. , 1983, British journal of anaesthesia.

[25]  J. Dietemann,et al.  Compression of the Subarachnoid Space by the Engorged Epidural Venous Plexus in Pregnant Women , 2006 .