Predictors of Nonuse of a High‐Potency Statin After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the Stabilization of Plaques Using Darapladib‐Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 52 (SOLID‐TIMI 52) Trial

Background High‐potency statins reduce cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes but remain underused in clinical practice. We examined predictors of nonuse of high‐potency statins after acute coronary syndromes. Methods and Results The Stabilization of pLaques usIng Darapladib‐Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (SOLID‐TIMI 52) trial enrolled patients after an acute coronary syndrome in 36 countries between 2009 and 2011. Statin use was strongly encouraged throughout the trial, and statin potency was at the discretion of the treating physician. A high‐potency statin was defined as ≥40 mg atorvastatin, ≥20 mg rosuvastatin, or 80 mg simvastatin daily. Predictors of nonuse of high‐potency statins were examined using logistic regression. Of the patients included (n=12 446), 11 850 (95.2%) were treated with a statin at baseline after acute coronary syndrome (median 14 days), but only 5212 (41.9%) were on a high‐potency statin. Selected patient factors associated with nonuse of high‐potency statins included age ≥75 years (odds ratio 1.39, 95% CI 1.24–1.56), female sex (odds ratio 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.22), renal dysfunction (odds ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.03–1.32), and heart failure during hospital admission (odds ratio 1.43, 95% CI 1.27–1.62). At 3 months after baseline, only 49% of patients had low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL. Among the 5490 patients (59%) who were not on a high‐potency statin at 3 months, lower low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol was a predictor of nonuse of a high‐potency statin after a median of 2.3 years (odds ratio 1.15 for 10 mg/dL decrease, 95% CI 1.11–1.19). Conclusion Despite the widespread use of statins after acute coronary syndromes, most patients are not treated with high‐potency statins early and late after the event, including patients at the highest risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01000727.

[1]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2011, European heart journal.

[2]  T. Brown,et al.  Underutilization of high-intensity statin therapy after hospitalization for coronary heart disease. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  A. Jaffe,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[4]  Solid-Timi Investigators Effect of darapladib on major coronary events after an acute coronary syndrome: the SOLID-TIMI 52 randomized clinical trial. , 2014 .

[5]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[7]  J. Spertus,et al.  Patterns of Statin Initiation, Intensification, and Maximization Among Patients Hospitalized With an Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2014, Circulation.

[8]  Dylan L. Steen,et al.  Effect of darapladib on major coronary events after an acute coronary syndrome: the SOLID-TIMI 52 randomized clinical trial. , 2014, JAMA.

[9]  V. Fuster,et al.  Risk factor control for coronary artery disease secondary prevention in large randomized trials. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  P. Libby,et al.  Cardiovascular benefits and diabetes risks of statin therapy in primary prevention: an analysis from the JUPITER trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[11]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation , 2012 .

[12]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Study design and rationale for the Stabilization of pLaques usIng Darapladib-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (SOLID-TIMI 52) trial in patients after an acute coronary syndrome. , 2011, American heart journal.

[13]  T. Lauer,et al.  Kardiologische Aspekte der präoperativen Risikostratifizierung , 2011 .

[14]  J. Spertus,et al.  Patterns and intensity of medical therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2011, JAMA.

[15]  Ian Graham,et al.  ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). , 2011, Atherosclerosis.

[16]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Use of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome: An analysis of 65,396 hospitalizations from 344 hospita participating in Get With The Guidelines (GWTG). , 2011, American heart journal.

[17]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Use of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome: an analysis of 65,396 hospitalizations from 344 hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines (GWTG). , 2010, American heart journal.

[18]  M. Gnant,et al.  Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials , 2010 .

[19]  R. Collins,et al.  Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials , 2010, The Lancet.

[20]  C. Cannon,et al.  Factors associated with discharge lipid-lowering drug prescription in patients hospitalized for coronary artery disease (from the Get With the Guidelines database). , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  Christopher E. Buller,et al.  2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2008, Circulation.

[22]  William Wijns,et al.  [Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes]. , 2007, Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology.

[23]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patie , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  G. Lamas,et al.  Focused Update of the ACC / AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2007 .

[25]  Philip J. Barter,et al.  Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Early intensive vs a delayed conservative simvastatin strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes: phase Z of the A to Z trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[27]  Christopher P Cannon,et al.  Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Thomas Weber,et al.  Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.