Year based EM-index: a new approach to evaluate the scientific impact of scholars

In the research community, generally the assessment of scholarly impact of an individual is based on citation counts of publications. Instead of this a different approach, year based h-indices have been developed based on different parameters such as total number of publications in year, total citation count earned by all the publications published in a particular year and the total number of citations earned in a particular year by all the publications which are published in any year. This index used the concept of original h-index to determine the index value. But the h-index suffers with big hit problems and the year based indices do not account the h-index big hit problems. To overcome this limitation of year based indices, we have extend the year based h-index with the EM-index and have defined a new approach named year based EM-index with three variants, which are year based EM-index by publications, publication year citations count and citation year citations. This year based EM-index considers only the h-core articles for scientific evaluation, but all those year based indices do not consider all items which have been occurring at least one time. To overcome this limitation of year based EM-index, we have extended the year based EM-index with $$\hbox {EM}^{'}$$EM′-index and have defined year based $$\hbox {EM}^{'}$$EM′-index, that consider all the items which occur at least one time. To legitimate the proposed method, an experimental study has been made on 89 scientists publication data, who are working in scientiometrics and bibliometrics fields. The experimental results show the capabilities of the year based EM-index and $$\hbox {EM}^{'}$$EM′-index over the year based h-indices.

[1]  R. Rousseau,et al.  New Definitions and Applications of Year-Based h-indices , 2016 .

[2]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[3]  Chun-Ting Zhang,et al.  The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations , 2009, PloS one.

[4]  Miguel A. García-Pérez,et al.  A multidimensional extension to Hirsch’s h-index , 2009, Scientometrics.

[5]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[6]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[7]  Anand Bihari,et al.  EM-index: a new measure to evaluate the scientific impact of scientists , 2017, Scientometrics.

[8]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  New developments related to the Hirsch index , 2006 .

[9]  Roberto Todeschini,et al.  The j-index: a new bibliometric index and multivariate comparisons between other common indices , 2011, Scientometrics.

[10]  Izzat Alsmadi,et al.  A Survey of Impact and Citation Indices: Limitations and Issues , 2012 .

[11]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[12]  R. Todeschini,et al.  Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators: Quantitative Tools for Studying and Evaluating Research , 2016 .

[13]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Year-based h-type indicators , 2012, Scientometrics.

[14]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[15]  Birger Larsen,et al.  A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators , 2014, Scientometrics.

[16]  R. Rousseau,et al.  Reflections on recent developments of the h-index and h-type indices , 2008 .

[17]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do we know about the h index? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  R. Rousseau,et al.  The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index , 2007 .

[19]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  L. Egghe An improvement of the h-index: the g-index , 2006 .