Exploring L2 writers' collaborative revision interactions and their writing performance

Abstract Over the last few decades, researchers and practitioners have acknowledged the social aspects of language learning. This study drew on Vygotsky's sociocultural learning theory to investigate EFL students' interactional dynamics during a collaborative revision activity. It also examined the impact of this jointly performed task on participants' writing performance. Participants included five pairs of EFL learners enrolled in an L2 essay-writing course at an Iranian university. Each pair attended one collaborative revision session during which they jointly revised their argumentative texts utilizing the feedback provided by their instructor. The researchers collected the participants' interactions during collaborative revision and their revised drafts. Data analysis revealed that students employed a variety of functions in their negotiations including scaffolding. It was also observed that scaffolding was mutual and both partners benefited from the joint revision task regardless of their level of L2 writing proficiency. These findings suggest that collaborative revision can be incorporated in EFL writing pedagogy as a method to improve writing and revision skills.

[1]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  Response To Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students , 2003 .

[2]  A. Ohta.  Applying Sociocultural Theory to an Analysis of Learner Discourse: Learner-Learner Collaborative Interaction in the Zone of Proximal Development , 1995 .

[3]  Vivian Zamel.  The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies , 1983 .

[4]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. , 1994 .

[5]  Ali Shehadeh,et al.  Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2 , 2011 .

[6]  Hui-Tzu Min,et al.  Training students to become successful peer reviewers , 2005 .

[7]  Manami Suzuki,et al.  Japanese Learners' Self Revisions and Peer Revisions of Their Written Compositions in English. , 2008 .

[8]  Merrill Swain,et al.  An interacting loop model for solar flare bursts. , 2002 .

[9]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Peer Revision in the L2 Classroom: Social-Cognitive Activities, Mediating Strategies, and Aspects of Social Behavior. , 1996 .

[10]  Randall W. Sadler,et al.  The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing , 2003 .

[11]  A. Tsui,et al.  Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments , 2000 .

[12]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Feedback on second language students' writing , 2006, Language Teaching.

[13]  Gayle L. Nelson,et al.  Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction , 1996 .

[14]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections , 2005 .

[15]  Olga S. Villamil,et al.  Activating the ZPD: Mutual Scaffolding in L2 Peer Revision , 2000 .

[16]  J. Lantolf.  SOCIOCULTURAL THEORY AND L2: State of the Art , 2006, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[17]  Steven Walsh,et al.  Investigating Classroom Discourse , 2006 .

[18]  Joy Reid,et al.  Responding to ESL Students' Texts: The Myths of Appropriation , 1994 .

[19]  L. Blanton.  Discourse, artifacts, and the ozarks: Understanding academic literacy☆ , 1994 .

[20]  J. Lantolf,et al.  Negative Feedback as Regulation and Second Language Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development , 1994 .

[21]  P. Ng,et al.  Analyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stances, Functions, and Content , 1995 .

[22]  Vivian Zamel,et al.  Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning , 1982 .

[23]  V. John-Steiner,et al.  Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework , 1996 .

[24]  Roger W. Barnard,et al.  Sociocultural theory and the teaching of process writing: The scaffolding of learning in a university context , 2005 .

[25]  Gayle L. Nelson,et al.  Writing Groups: Cross-Cultural Issues. , 1994 .

[26]  Xavier Gutiérrez.  What Does Metalinguistic Activity in Learners' Interaction During a Collaborative L2 Writing Task Look Like? , 2008 .

[27]  Gert Rijlaarsdam,et al.  The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL , 2010 .

[28]  María C. M. de Guerrero,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Peer Revision on L2 Writing , 1998 .

[29]  Richard Badger,et al.  A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class , 2006 .

[30]  K. Hyland,et al.  Genre-Based Pedagogies: A Social Response to Process. , 2003 .

[31]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[32]  Bernard Susser,et al.  Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction , 1994 .

[33]  Yong Mei Fung.  Collaborative Writing Features , 2010 .

[34]  Gayle L. Nelson,et al.  ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups , 1998 .

[35]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Patterns of Interaction in ESL Pair Work , 2002 .

[36]  Kate Mangelsdorf,et al.  ESL student response stances in a peer-review task , 1992 .

[37]  Paul Rollinson,et al.  Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class , 2005 .