Including Farmer Irrigation Behavior in a Sociohydrological Modeling Framework With Application in North India

Understanding water user behavior and its potential outcomes is important for the development of suitable water resource management options. Computational models are commonly used to assist water resource management decision making; however, while natural processes are increasingly well modeled, the inclusion of human behavior has lagged behind. Improved representation of irrigation water user behavior within models can provide more accurate and relevant information for irrigation management in the agricultural sector. This paper outlines a model that conceptualizes and proceduralizes observed farmer irrigation practices, highlighting impacts and interactions between the environment and behavior. It is developed using a bottom-up approach, informed through field experience and farmer interaction in the state of Uttar Pradesh, northern India. Observed processes and dynamics were translated into parsimonious algorithms, which represent field conditions and provide a tool for policy analysis and water management. The modeling framework is applied to four districts in Uttar Pradesh and used to evaluate the potential impact of changes in climate and irrigation behavior on water resources and farmer livelihood. Results suggest changes in water user behavior could have a greater impact on water resources, crop yields, and farmer income than changes in future climate. In addition, increased abstraction may be sustainable but its viability varies across the study region. By simulating the feedbacks and interactions between the behavior of water users, irrigation officials and agricultural practices, this work highlights the importance of directly including water user behavior in policy making and operational tools to achieve water and livelihood security.

[1]  Richard G. Allen,et al.  Comparison of Reference Evapotranspiration Calculations as Part of the ASCE Standardization Effort , 2003 .

[2]  Anil Kumar Singh,et al.  Estimation of crop coefficients of dry-seeded irrigated rice–wheat rotation on raised beds by field water balance method in the Indo-Gangetic plains, India , 2013 .

[3]  Nicholas Brozović,et al.  Modeling irrigation behavior in groundwater systems , 2014 .

[4]  R Revelle,et al.  The ganges water machine. , 1975, Science.

[5]  C. Scott,et al.  Understanding and managing the water-energy nexus: Moving beyond the energy debate , 2006 .

[6]  Y. Hong,et al.  The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales , 2007 .

[7]  Abhijit Mukherjee,et al.  Groundwater quality and depletion in the Indo-Gangetic Basin mapped from in situ observations , 2016 .

[8]  Erik Mostert,et al.  Values in water management , 2018 .

[9]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  A sociohydrological model for smallholder farmers in Maharashtra, India , 2016 .

[10]  Subimal Ghosh,et al.  Water-food-energy nexus with changing agricultural scenarios in India during recent decades , 2017 .

[11]  Phoebe Koundouri,et al.  Potential for groundwater management: Gisser‐Sanchez effect reconsidered , 2004 .

[12]  D. Jacob,et al.  Adaptation to changing water resources in the Ganges basin, northern India , 2011 .

[13]  W. Adger,et al.  Adaptation to climate change in the developing world , 2003 .

[14]  M. Hipsey,et al.  “Panta Rhei—Everything Flows”: Change in hydrology and society—The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022 , 2013 .

[15]  J. Schewe,et al.  Enhanced future variability during India's rainy season , 2013 .

[16]  R. L Yadav,et al.  Assessing on-farm efficiency and economics of fertilizer N, P and K in rice wheat systems of India , 2003 .

[17]  K. Loague Rainfall-Runoff Modelling , 2010 .

[18]  Meike van Ginneken,et al.  India's water economy : bracing for a turbulent future , 2008 .

[19]  B. Goswami,et al.  Drying of Indian subcontinent by rapid Indian Ocean warming and a weakening land-sea thermal gradient , 2015, Nature Communications.

[20]  S. Lane Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world , 2013 .

[21]  Reviving the Ganges water machine: why? , 2015 .

[22]  J. Famiglietti The global groundwater crisis , 2014 .

[23]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[24]  David E. Rosenberg,et al.  Hydro-economic models: concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. , 2009 .

[25]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Socio‐hydrology: A new science of people and water , 2012 .

[26]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Conceptualizing socio‐hydrological drought processes: The case of the Maya collapse , 2016, Water resources research.

[27]  R. Wilby,et al.  Scenario-neutral approach to climate change impact studies: Application to flood risk , 2010 .

[28]  A. Dinar,et al.  Cooperative institutions for sustainable common pool resource management: Application to groundwater , 2012 .

[29]  J. Eheart,et al.  An agent‐based model of farmer decision‐making and water quality impacts at the watershed scale under markets for carbon allowances and a second‐generation biofuel crop , 2011 .

[30]  M. Puma,et al.  Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade , 2017, Nature.

[31]  D. Allen,et al.  Towards best practice for assessing the impacts of climate change on groundwater , 2012, Hydrogeology Journal.

[32]  Micha Gisser,et al.  Economic Aspects of Ground Water Resources and Replacement Flows in Semiarid Agricultural Areas , 1973 .

[33]  M. Rajeevan,et al.  Statistical Selection of the Optimum Models in the CMIP5 Dataset for Climate Change Projections of Indian Monsoon Rainfall , 2015 .

[34]  François Bousquet,et al.  Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review , 2004 .

[35]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Prediction in a socio-hydrological world , 2016 .

[36]  Pier Luigi Vidale,et al.  The resolution sensitivity of the South Asian monsoon and Indo-Pacific in a global 0.35° AGCM , 2016, Climate Dynamics.

[37]  Reviving the Ganges Water Machine: potential , 2016 .

[38]  E. Mostert An alternative approach for socio-hydrology: Case study research , 2017 .

[39]  Rana P. B. Singh,et al.  Environmental consequences of agricultural development: a case study from the green revolution state of Haryana, India. , 2000 .

[40]  Steven M. Gorelick,et al.  A hydrologic‐economic modeling approach for analysis of urban water supply dynamics in Chennai, India , 2010 .

[41]  D. Deryng,et al.  Climate and southern Africa's water–energy–food nexus , 2014 .

[42]  Wouter Buytaert,et al.  Socio-hydrological modelling: a review asking "why, what and how?" , 2016 .

[43]  M. Tidball,et al.  Optimal adaptation strategies to face shocks on groundwater resources , 2014 .

[44]  Marc F. P. Bierkens,et al.  Global hydrology 2015: State, trends, and directions , 2015 .

[45]  M. Smith,et al.  Yield response to water: the original FAO water production function. , 2012 .

[46]  R. Sinha,et al.  The use of semi-structured interviews for the characterisation of farmer irrigation practices , 2015 .

[47]  H. Wheater,et al.  On inclusion of water resource management in Earth system models – Part 1: Problem definition and representation of water demand , 2014 .

[48]  J. Briscoe India's Water Economy: Bracing for a Turbulent Future , 2006 .

[49]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Norms and values in sociohydrological models , 2017 .

[50]  K. Baker,et al.  The Green Revolution re-assessed: Insider perspectives on agrarian change in Bulandshahr District, Western Uttar Pradesh, India , 2007 .

[51]  Shiv O. Prasher,et al.  Coupling of a distributed stakeholder-built system dynamics socio-economic model with SAHYSMOD for sustainable soil salinity management – Part 1: Model development , 2017 .

[52]  Felipe J. Colón-González,et al.  Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[54]  N. Rosenberg,et al.  Sensitivity of some potential evapotranspiration estimation methods to climate change , 1993 .

[55]  J. McBride,et al.  Projected Changes in Late-Twenty-First-Century Tropical Cyclone Frequency in 13 Coupled Climate Models from Phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project , 2013 .

[56]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Socio-hydrologic modeling to understand and mediate the competition for water between agriculture development and environmental health : Murrumbidgee River Basin, Australia , 2014 .