REVOLUTIONARY RESEARCH STRATEGIES FOR E-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT: A PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE FOR RESEARCH DESIGN AND DATA COLLECTION IN THE AGE OF THE INTERNET

Just as the Internet has changed the way many businesses conduct business, the Internet can also change the way academic researchers gather data. We describe revolutionary research strategies that employ six new data-collecting methodologies that can be employed using Internet technology. Data-collecting agents can gather very large amounts of data from the World Wide Web in a fraction of the time and the cost that it takes to gather data using traditional research methodologies. Online experiments, online judgment tasks, and online surveys expand the reach and reduce the cost when compared to traditional experiments, judgment tasks, and surveys. Because of the vast amounts of data available online, quasi-experiments can be conducted that allow the researcher to find subjects that meet some stimulus and some control without taking them out of their own environment. Finally, log files track a person’s movements and actions through a Web site. This article investigates the use of these relatively new tools from a philosophy of science perspective. We find that these new data collecting tools can enable research that is difficult or impossible when using traditional, non-online research methodologies. Using Runkel and McGrath’s (1972) “ThreeHorned Dilemma” model for traditional research methodologies as a base, we develop a framework that illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of these new tools. This article also provides a critical review of the literature that analyzes how these revolutionary data-collecting techniques are employed when examining theoretical development of e-business phenomenon.

[1]  K. Reynolds,et al.  Determinants of internet auction success and closing price: An exploratory study , 2003 .

[2]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[3]  E. Jantsch The design of inquiring systems,: by C. West Churchman New York, Basic Books, 1972. , 1972 .

[4]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  ANALYZING COMPETITIVE AND TACITLY COLLUSIVE STRATEGIES IN ELECTRONIC MARKETPLACES , 2003 .

[5]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Design principles for long-lived Internet agents , 2000, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[6]  Alok Gupta,et al.  Comparative analysis of multi-item online auctions: evidence from the laboratory , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  Michaël Dewally,et al.  A Comparison of Reputation, Certification, Warranties, and Information Disclosure as Remedies for Information Asymmetries: Lessons from the On-Line Comic Book Market , 2002 .

[8]  Larry E. Beutler The view from the rear: An editorial. , 1996 .

[9]  Jason Millman,et al.  Research on human behavior;: A systematic guide to method , 1972 .

[10]  Kim Sheehan,et al.  Toward a Typology of Internet Users and Online Privacy Concerns , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[11]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  When snipers become predators: can mechanism design save online auctions? , 2003, CACM.

[12]  David Lucking-Reiley,et al.  Demand reduction in multiunit auctions: Evidence from a sportscard field experiment , 2004 .

[13]  D. Ariely,et al.  Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions , 2003 .

[14]  Stephen S. Standifird Reputation and e-commerce: eBay auctions and the asymmetrical impact of positive and negative ratings , 2001 .

[15]  Joy Tillotson,et al.  Internet use through the University of Toronto Library: demographics, destinations, and users' reactions , 1995 .

[16]  Allan H. Church,et al.  IS THERE A METHOD TO OUR MADNESS? THE IMPACT OF DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY ON ORGANIZATIONAL SURVEY RESULTS , 2001 .

[17]  A. Roth,et al.  Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet , 2002 .

[18]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers , 2000 .

[19]  J. Livingston How Valuable Is a Good Reputation? A Sample Selection Model of Internet Auctions , 2005, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[20]  David Lucking-Reiley,et al.  Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the internet , 1999 .

[21]  Robert F. Easley,et al.  Jump Bidding Strategies in Internet Auctions , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[22]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Pennies from Ebay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions , 2000 .

[23]  Alok Gupta,et al.  Replicating Online Yankee Auctions to Analyze Auctioneers' and Bidders' Strategies , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay' s reputation system , 2002, The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce.

[25]  John A. List,et al.  BIDDING BEHAVIOR AND DECISION COSTS IN FIELD EXPERIMENTS , 2002 .

[26]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Dilemmatics: The Study of Research Choices and Dilemmas , 1981 .

[28]  Sandy D. Jap An Exploratory Study of the Introduction of Online Reverse Auctions , 2003 .

[29]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  Business Policy and Metaphysics: Some Philosophical Considerations , 1982 .

[30]  M. Melnik,et al.  Does a Seller's Ecommerce Reputation Matter? Evidence from Ebay Auctions , 2003 .

[31]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Demand Reduction in Multi-Unit Auctions: Evidence from a Sportscard Field Experiment: Reply , 2005 .

[32]  Enrique Dans,et al.  Existing Business Models for Auctions and their Adaptation to Electronic Markets , 2002, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[33]  Curt J. Dommeyer,et al.  Comparing Two Forms of an E-mail Survey: Embedded vs Attached , 2000 .

[34]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Website-generated market-research data Tracing the tracks left behind by visitors , 2001 .

[35]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Online auctions, messaging, communication and social facilitation: a simulation and experimental evidence , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  N Bowles Born to be wired. , 1994, Nursing management.

[37]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  The Role of Reputation In Open and Closed Societies : An Experimental Study of Internet Auctioning , 2003 .

[38]  Raj Mehta,et al.  Comparing Response Rates and Response Content in Mail versus Electronic Mail Surveys , 1995 .

[39]  J. Wooders,et al.  Reputation in Auctions: Theory, and Evidence from Ebay , 2006 .

[40]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  New buyers' arrival under dynamic pricing market microstructure: the case of group-buying discounts on the Internet , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[41]  Alok Gupta,et al.  A theoretical and empirical investigation of multi‐item on‐line auctions , 2000, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[42]  Ulrich Brinkmann,et al.  „Face to Interface“: Zum Problem der Vertrauenskonstitution im Internet am Beispiel von elektronischen Auktionen / “Face to Interface” – The Establishment of Trust in the Internet: The Case of e-Auctions , 2001 .

[43]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .

[44]  Arie Segev,et al.  Optimal Design of Internet-Based Auctions , 2001, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[45]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Follow the leader? Strategic pricing in e-commerce , 2000, ICIS.

[46]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Self-Interest, Reciprocity, and Participation in Online Reputation Systems , 2004 .

[47]  Julia Brande Earp,et al.  Innovative web use to learn about consumer behavior and online privacy , 2003, CACM.

[48]  S. Scribner Studying working intelligence. , 1984 .

[49]  Rong Chen,et al.  Examination of brand knowledge, perceived risk and consumers' intention to adopt an online retailer , 2003 .

[50]  David H. Eaton Valuing Information : Evidence from Guitar Auctions on , 2002 .

[51]  James E. Pitkow,et al.  Characterizing Browsing Behaviors on the World-Wide Web , 1995 .

[52]  Ginger Zhe Jin,et al.  Blind Trust Online: Experimental Evidence from Baseball Cards , 2002 .

[53]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context , 2003 .

[54]  Ho Geun Lee,et al.  Do electronic marketplaces lower the price of goods? , 1998, CACM.

[55]  Ronald T. Wilcox Experts and Amateurs: The Role of Experience in Internet Auctions , 2000 .

[56]  Joanne M. Tucker,et al.  Comparing bidding and pricing between in‐person and online auctions , 2000 .

[57]  Philip C. Kendall,et al.  Methodological Issues in Treatment Research for Anxiety Disorders in Youth , 1998, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[58]  Jungpil Hahn,et al.  MEASURING AND COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF E-COMMERCE WEBSITE DESIGNS , 2003 .

[59]  J. Lave Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[60]  Robert J. House,et al.  Judgment calls in research , 1982 .

[61]  James E. Pitkow,et al.  Characterizing Browsing Strategies in the World-Wide Web , 1995, Comput. Networks ISDN Syst..

[62]  Alok Gupta,et al.  Insights and analyses of online auctions , 2001, CACM.

[63]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Winner's Curse, Reserve Prices and Endogenous Entry: Empirical Insights from Ebay Auctions , 2003 .

[64]  Paul Resnick,et al.  The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment , 2002 .