“All that glitters is not … alone”. Congruity effects in highly and less predictable sentence contexts

CONTEXT Using natural connected speech, the aim of the present study was to examine the semantic congruity effect (i.e. the difference between semantically incongruous and congruous words) in sentence contexts that generate high or moderate final word expectancies. METHODS We used sentences with two levels of word expectancy in the auditory modality: familiar proverbs (that generate high final word expectancy), and unfamiliar sentences (that generate only moderate final word expectancy). RESULTS Results revealed an early congruity effect (0-200 ms) that developed across all scalp sites for familiar proverbs but not for unfamiliar sentences. By contrast, typical centro-parietal N400 and Late Positivity Component congruity effects developed later (200-500 ms and 600-900 ms ranges) for both familiar proverbs and unfamiliar sentences. DISCUSSION We argue that the early congruity effect for proverbs comprises both a Phonological Mismatch Negativity, reflecting the processing of the acoustic/phonological mismatch between the expected (congruous) and unexpected (incongruous) sentence completions and a typical N400 semantic congruity effect with an unusual short latency because final words can be predicted from the unusually high contextual constraints of familiar proverbs. These results are considered in the light of current views of anticipation and prediction processes in sentence contexts.

[1]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[2]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2012 .

[4]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400 , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Megan A. Boudewyn,et al.  Cognitive Control and Discourse Comprehension in Schizophrenia , 2012, Schizophrenia research and treatment.

[8]  Marta Kutas,et al.  The phonemic restoration effect reveals pre-N400 effect of supportive sentence context in speech perception , 2010, Brain Research.

[9]  M. Kutas,et al.  Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005) , 2006 .

[10]  C. Petten,et al.  Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Giora Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis , 1997 .

[13]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[14]  Y. Joanette,et al.  Processing of metaphoric and non-metaphoric alternative meanings of words after right- and left-hemispheric lesion , 2003, Brain and Language.

[15]  A. Katz,et al.  Electrophysiological and behavioral measures of the influence of literal and figurative contextual constraints on proverb comprehension , 2007, Brain and Language.

[16]  D. Caplan,et al.  The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2007, Brain and Language.

[17]  D. Sheehan,et al.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. , 1998, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[18]  Claudio González-Parra,et al.  All That Glitters Is Not Gold , 2008 .

[19]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Todd R. Ferretti,et al.  Reading Proverbs in Context:The Role of Explicit Markers , 2003 .

[21]  R. Kronland-Martinet,et al.  Influence of syllabic lengthening on semantic processing in spoken French: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[23]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[24]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Potato not Pope: human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Perspectives on sentence processing , 2015 .

[26]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases , 2006 .

[27]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Individual Variation in the Late Positive Complex to Semantic Anomalies , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[28]  J. Connolly,et al.  The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences , 1990, Brain and Language.

[29]  H. Neville,et al.  Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials , 1991, Psychobiology.

[30]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A retrieval theory of priming in memory. , 1988, Psychological review.

[31]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of interaction between contextual expectation and semantic integration during the processing of collocations , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[32]  A. Kok On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[33]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: Evidence from ERPs in a picture–sentence matching task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[35]  E. Plante,et al.  Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  J. Kounios,et al.  Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  J. Nicol,et al.  On the Distinctiveness, Independence, and Time Course of the Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies. , 1999 .

[38]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. , 1994 .

[39]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. , 2006, Psychological review.

[40]  J. Connolly,et al.  Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences , 1992, Brain and Language.

[41]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Analysis of Semantic Congruity and Repetition Effects in Sentences , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Morphological analysis in sentence processing: An ERP study , 2003 .

[44]  Alberto Zani,et al.  The role of left and right hemispheres in the comprehension of idiomatic language: an electrical neuroimaging study , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[45]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[46]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[47]  Kara D. Federmeier Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[48]  J. G. Martin,et al.  Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects in vowel-stop consonant-bowel sequences. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  R. Gibbs The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding , 1994 .

[50]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[51]  P. Hagoort,et al.  A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family : Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate , 1999 .

[52]  H. Jasper Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .

[53]  M. Kutas,et al.  A preliminary comparison of the N400 response to semantic anomalies during reading, listening and signing. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[54]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Dissociating N400 Effects of Prediction from Association in Single-word Contexts , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  P. Gordon,et al.  The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[56]  C. Petten,et al.  A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension? ERP evidence from hemifield presentation , 2007, Brain Research.

[57]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Figurative Language and Thought , 1998 .

[58]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  J. Connolly,et al.  Electrophysiological markers of pre-lexical speech processing: Evidence for bottom–up and top–down effects on spoken word processing , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[60]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Word recognition: Context effects without priming , 1986, Cognition.

[61]  A. Dale,et al.  Distinct Patterns of Neural Modulation during the Processing of Conceptual and Syntactic Anomalies , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  C Van Petten,et al.  The use of event-related potentials in the study of brain asymmetries. , 1988, The International journal of neuroscience.

[63]  Noël Nguyen,et al.  Acoustic aspects of vowel harmony in French , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[64]  P. Tabossi,et al.  The comprehension of idioms. , 1988 .

[65]  Marta Kutas,et al.  When temporal terms belie conceptual order , 1998, Nature.

[66]  J. G. Martin,et al.  Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  Todd R. Ferretti,et al.  Moment-By-Moment Reading of Proverbs in Literal and Nonliteral Contexts , 2001 .

[68]  Wilson L. Taylor,et al.  “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .

[69]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[70]  Asa Kasher,et al.  Differential Effects of Right- and Left-Hemisphere Damage on Understanding Sarcasm and Metaphor , 2000 .

[71]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  To Predict or Not to Predict: Influences of Task and Strategy on the Processing of Semantic Relations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[72]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[73]  S. Luck An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[74]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[75]  W. Sommer,et al.  Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: A brain potential study of noun–adjective agreement in Spanish , 2006, Brain Research.

[76]  Christine Passerieux,et al.  On understanding idiomatic language: The salience hypothesis assessed by ERPs , 2006, Brain Research.

[77]  M. Kutas,et al.  What's in a pause: event-related potential analysis of temporal disruptions in written and spoken sentences , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[78]  J. Connolly,et al.  Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[79]  H. Kolk,et al.  The interplay of heuristics and parsing routines in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and reaction times , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[80]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[81]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in Language Perception: Mild and Strong Conflicts Elicit Different ERP Patterns , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[82]  W. Marslen-Wilson Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[83]  M. Kutas,et al.  Fractionating the Word Repetition Effect with Event-Related Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[84]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[85]  A. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[86]  R. Giora,et al.  On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language☆ , 1999 .

[87]  M. Besson,et al.  Normes de complétion pour 744 contextes linguistiques français de différents formats. , 1996 .

[88]  Marte Otten,et al.  Discourse-Based Word Anticipation During Language Processing: Prediction or Priming? , 2008 .

[89]  A. Friederici,et al.  Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[90]  P. Hagoort The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[91]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[92]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[93]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[94]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[95]  Francesco Vespignani,et al.  Predictive Mechanisms in Idiom Comprehension , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[96]  J. Pynte,et al.  The Time-Course of Metaphor Comprehension: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1996, Brain and Language.

[97]  P. Holcomb Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[98]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[99]  U. Bellugi,et al.  Neural Systems Mediating American Sign Language: Effects of Sensory Experience and Age of Acquisition , 1997, Brain and Language.

[100]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Meaning and modality: influences of context, semantic memory organization, and perceptual predictability on picture processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[101]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Contextual Influences during Spoken-Word Recognition: N200 Versus N400 Effects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[102]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[103]  T. Hergueta,et al.  The mini international neuropsychiatric interview , 1998, European Psychiatry.

[104]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .